The
Anti-Empire Report
Johnny got his gun
By William Blum
01/12/07 "ICH" -- --
In the past year Iran has issued several warnings to the
United States about the consequences of an American or
Israeli attack. One statement, issued in November by a
high Iranian military official, declared: "If America
attacks Iran, its 200,000 troops and 33 bases in the
region will be extremely vulnerable, and both American
politicians and military commanders are aware of it."[1]
Iran apparently believes that American leaders would be
so deeply distressed by the prospect of their young men
and women being endangered and possibly killed that they
would forswear any reckless attacks on Iran. As if
American leaders have been deeply stabbed by pain about
throwing youthful American bodies into the bottomless snakepit called Iraq, or were restrained by fear of
retaliation or by moral qualms while feeding 58,000
young lives to the Vietnam beast. As if American
leaders, like all world leaders, have ever had such
concerns.
Let's have a short look at some modern American history,
which may be instructive in this regard. A report of the
US Congress in 1994 informed us that:
Approximately 60,000 military personnel were used as
human subjects in the 1940s to test two chemical agents,
mustard gas and lewisite [blister gas]. Most of these
subjects were not informed of the nature of the
experiments and never received medical followup after
their participation in the research. Additionally, some
of these human subjects were threatened with
imprisonment at Fort Leavenworth if they discussed these
experiments with anyone, including their wives, parents,
and family doctors. For decades, the Pentagon denied
that the research had taken place, resulting in decades
of suffering for many veterans who became ill after the
secret testing.[2]
In the decades between the 1940s and 1990s, we find a
remarkable variety of government programs, either
formally, or in effect, using soldiers as guinea pigs --
marched to nuclear explosion sites, with pilots sent
through the mushroom clouds; subjected to chemical and
biological weapons experiments; radiation experiments;
behavior modification experiments that washed their
brains with LSD; widespread exposure to the highly toxic
dioxin of Agent Orange in Korea and Vietnam ... the list
goes on ... literally millions of experimental subjects,
seldom given a choice or adequate information, often
with disastrous effects to their physical and/or mental
health, rarely with proper medical care or even
monitoring.[3]
In the 1990s, many thousands of American soldiers came
home from the Gulf War with unusual, debilitating
ailments. Exposure to harmful chemical or biological
agents was suspected, but the Pentagon denied that this
had occurred. Years went by while the veterans suffered
terribly: neurological problems, chronic fatigue, skin
problems, scarred lungs, memory loss, muscle and joint
pain, severe headaches, personality changes, passing
out, and much more. Eventually, the Pentagon, inch by
inch, was forced to move away from its denials and admit
that, yes, chemical weapon depots had been bombed; then,
yes, there probably were releases of deadly poisons;
then, yes, American soldiers were indeed in the vicinity
of these poisonous releases, 400 soldiers; then, it
might have been 5,000; then, "a very large number",
probably more than 15,000; then, finally, a precise
number -- 20,867; then, "The Pentagon announced that a
long-awaited computer model estimates that nearly
100,000 U.S. soldiers could have been exposed to trace
amounts of sarin gas."[4]
If the Pentagon had been much more forthcoming from the
outset about what it knew all along about these various
substances and weapons, the soldiers might have had a
proper diagnosis early on and received appropriate care
sooner. The cost in terms of human suffering has been
incalculable.
Soldiers have also been forced to take vaccines against
anthrax and nerve gas not approved by the FDA as safe
and effective; and punished, sometimes treated like
criminals, if they refused. (During World War II,
soldiers were forced to take a yellow fever vaccine,
with the result that some 330,000 of them were infected
with the hepatitis B virus.[5])
And through all the recent wars, countless American
soldiers have been put in close proximity to the
radioactive dust of exploded depleted uranium-tipped
shells and missiles on the battlefield; depleted uranium
has been associated with a long list of rare and
terrible illnesses and birth defects. It poisons the
air, the soil, the water, the lungs, the blood, and the
genes. (The widespread dissemination of depleted uranium
by American warfare -- from Serbia to Afghanistan to
Iraq -- should be an international scandal and crisis,
like AIDS, and would be in a world not so intimidated by
the United States.)
The catalogue of Pentagon abuses of American soldiers
goes on ... Troops serving in Iraq or their families
have reported purchasing with their own funds
bullet-proof vests, better armor for their vehicles,
medical supplies, and global positioning devices, all
for their own safety, which were not provided to them by
the army ... Continuous complaints by servicewomen of
sexual assault and rape at the hands of their male
counterparts are routinely played down or ignored by the
military brass ... Numerous injured and disabled vets
from all wars have to engage in an ongoing struggle to
get the medical care they were promised ... One should
read "Army Acts to Curb Abuses of Injured Recruits" (New
York Times, May 12, 2006) for accounts of the callous,
bordering on sadistic, treatment of soldiers in bases in
the United States ... Repeated tours of duty, which
fracture family life and increase the chance not only of
death or injury but of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).[6]
National Public Radio's "All Things Considered", on
December 4 and other days, ran a series on· Army
mistreatment of soldiers home from Iraq and suffering
serious PTSD. At Colorado's Ft. Carson these afflicted
soldiers are receiving a variety of abuse and punishment
much more than the help they need, as officers harass
and punish them for being emotionally "weak."
Keep the above in mind the next time you hear a
president or a general speaking on Memorial Day about
"honor" and "duty" and about how much we "owe to the
brave young men and women who have made the ultimate
sacrifice in the cause of freedom and democracy."
And read "Johnny
Got His Gun" by Dalton Trumbo
for the
ultimate abuse of soldiers by leaders of nations.
The conscience of our leaders
After he ordered the bombing of Panama in December 1989,
which killed anywhere from 500 to a few thousand totally
innocent people, guilty of no harm to any American, the
first President George Bush declared that his "heart
goes out to the families of those who have died in
Panama".[7]
When asked by a reporter: "Was it really worth it to
send people to their death for this? To get Noriega?",
Bush replied: "Every human life is precious, and yet I
have to answer, yes, it has been worth it."[8]
Speaking in November 1990 of his imminent invasion of
Iraq, Bush, Sr. said: "People say to me: 'How many
lives? How many lives can you expend?' Each one is
precious."[9]
While his killing of thousands of Iraqis was proceeding
merrily along in 2003, the second President George Bush
was moved to say: "We believe in the value and dignity
of every human life."[10]
In December 2006, the White House spokesman for Bush,
Jr., commenting about American deaths reaching 3,000 in
Iraq, said President Bush "believes that every life is
precious and grieves for each one that is lost."[11]
Both father and son are on record expressing their deep
concern for God and prayer both before and during their
mass slaughters. "I trust God speaks through me," said
Bush the younger in 2004. "Without that, I couldn't do
my job."[12]
After his devastation of Iraq and its people, Bush the
elder said: "I think that, like a lot of others who had
positions of responsibility in sending someone else's
kids to war, we realize that in prayer what mattered is
how it might have seemed to God."[13]
God, one surmises, might have asked George Bush, father
and son, about the kids of Iraq. And the adults. And, in
a testy, rather ungodlike manner, might have snapped:
"So stop wasting all the precious lives already!"
In the now-famous exchange on TV in 1996 between
Madeleine Albright and reporter Lesley Stahl, the latter
was speaking of US sanctions against Iraq, and asked the
then-US ambassador to the UN, and Secretary of
State-to-be: "We have heard that a half million children
have died. I mean, that's more children than died in
Hiroshima. And -- and you know, is the price worth it?"
Replied Albright: "I think this is a very hard choice,
but the price -- we think the price is worth it."[14]
Ten years later, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice,
continuing the fine tradition of female Secretaries of
State and the equally noble heritage of the Bush family,
declared that the current horror in Iraq is "worth the
investment" in American lives and dollars.[15]
And don't forget that we can't pull out of Iraq now
because it would dishonor the troops who haven't died
yet.
The American media as the Berlin Wall
In December 1975, while East Timor, which lies at the
eastern end of the Indonesian archipelago, was
undergoing a process of decolonization from Portugal, a
struggle for power took place. A movement of the left,
Fretilin, prevailed and then declared East Timor's
independence from Portugal. Nine days later, Indonesia
invaded East Timor. The invasion was launched the day
after US President Gerald Ford and Secretary of State
Henry Kissinger had left Indonesia after giving
President Suharto permission to use American arms,
which, under US law, could not be used for aggression.
But Indonesia was Washington's most valuable ally in
Southeast Asia and, in any event, the United States was
not inclined to look kindly on any government of the
left.
Indonesia soon achieved complete control over East
Timor, with the help of the American arms and other
military aid, as well as diplomatic support at the UN.
Amnesty International estimated that by 1989, Indonesian
troops had killed 200,000 people out of a population of
between 600,000 and 700,000, a death rate which is
probably one of the highest in the entire history of
wars.[16]
Is it not remarkable that in the numerous articles in
the American daily press following President Ford's
death last month, there was not a single mention of his
role in the East Timor massacre? A search of the
extensive Lexis-Nexis and other media databases finds
mention of this only in a few letters to the editor from
readers; not a word even in the reports of any of the
news agencies, like the Associated Press, which
generally shy away from controversy less than the
newspapers they serve; nor a single mention in the
mainstream broadcast news programs.
Imagine if following the recent death of Augusto
Pinochet the media made no mention of his overthrow of
the Allende government in Chile, or the mass murder and
torture which followed. Ironically, the recent articles
about Ford also failed to mention his remark a year
after Pinochet's coup. President Ford declared that what
the United States had done in Chile was "in the best
interest of the people in Chile and certainly in our own
best interest."[17]
During the Cold War, the American government and media
never missed an opportunity to point out the news events
embarrassing to the Soviet Union which became non-events
in the communist media.
Man shall never fly
The Cold War is still with us. Because the ideological
conflict that was the basis for it has not gone away.
Because it can't go away. As long as capitalism exists,
as long as it puts profit before people, as it must, as
long as it puts profit before the environment, as it
must, those on the receiving end of its sharp pointed
stick must look for a better way.
Thus it is that when Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez
announced a few days ago that he plans to nationalize
telephone and electric utility companies to accelerate
his "socialist revolution", the spokesperson for
Capitalism Central, White House press secretary Tony
Snow, was quick to the attack: "Nationalization has a
long and inglorious history of failure around the
world," Snow declared. "We support the Venezuelan people
and think this is an unhappy day for them."[18]
Snow presumably buys into the belief that capitalism
defeated socialism in the Cold War. A victory for a
superior idea. The boys of Capital chortle in their
martinis about the death of socialism. The word has been
banned from polite conversation. And they hope that no
one will notice that every socialist experiment of any
significance in the past century has either been
corrupted, subverted, perverted, or destabilized ... or
crushed, overthrown, bombed, or invaded ... or otherwise
had life made impossible for it, by the United States.
Not one socialist government or movement -- from the
Russian Revolution to Cuba, the Sandinistas in Nicaragua
and the FMLN in Salvador, from Communist China to
Grenada, Chile and Vietnam -- not one was permitted to
rise or fall solely on its own merits; not one was left
secure enough to drop its guard against the all-powerful
enemy abroad and freely and fully relax control at home.
Even many plain old social democracies -- such as in
Guatemala, Iran, British Guiana, Serbia and Haiti, which
were not in love with capitalism and were looking for
another path -- even these too were made to bite the
dust by Uncle Sam.
It's as if the Wright brothers' first experiments with
flying machines all failed because the automobile
interests sabotaged each test flight. And then the good
and god-fearing folk of America looked upon this, took
notice of the consequences, nodded their collective
heads wisely, and intoned solemnly: Man shall never fly.
Tony Snow would have us believe that the government is
no match for the private sector in efficiently getting
large and important things done. But is that really
true? Let's clear our minds for a moment, push our
upbringing to one side, and remember that the American
government has landed men on the moon, created great
dams, marvelous national parks, an interstate highway
system, the peace corps, built up an incredible military
machine (ignoring for the moment what it's used for),
student loans, social security, Medicare, insurance for
bank deposits, protection of pension funds against
corporate misuse, the Environmental Protection Agency,
the National Institutes of Health, the Smithsonian, the
G.I. Bill, and much, much more. In short, the government
has been quite good at doing what it wanted to do, or
what labor and other movements have made it do, like
establishing worker health and safety standards and
requiring food manufacturers to list detailed
information about ingredients.
When George W. took office one of his chief goals was to
examine whether jobs done by federal employees could be
performed more efficiently by private contractors. Bush
called it his top management priority. By the end of
2005, 50,000 government jobs had been studied. And
federal workers had won the job competitions more than
80 percent of the time.[19]
We have to remind the American people of what they've
instinctively learned but tend to forget when faced with
statements like that of Tony Snow -- that they don't
want more government, or less government; they don't
want big government, or small government; they want
government on their side.
And by the way, Tony, the great majority of the
population in the last years of the Soviet Union had a
much better quality of life, including a longer life,
under their "failed nationalized" economy, than they
have had under unbridled capitalism.
None of the above, of course, will deter The World's
Only Superpower from continuing its jihad to impose
capitalist fundamentalism upon the world.
Unwelcome guests at the table of the respectable folk
Sen. Joseph Biden, Democrat from Delaware, the new
chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, has
announced four weeks of hearings focused on every aspect
of US policy in Iraq. He really wants to get to the
bottom of things, find out how and why things went so
wrong, who are the ones responsible, hold them
accountable, and what can be done now. The committee
will hear the testimony of top political, economic and
intelligence experts, foreign diplomats, and former and
current senior US officials, like Condoleezza Rice,
Brent Scowcroft, Samuel Berger, Zbigniew Brzezinski,
Henry Kissinger, Madeleine Albright and George
Shultz.[20] All the usual suspects.
But why not call upon some unusual suspects? Why do
congressional committees and committees appointed by the
White House typically not call experts who dissent from
the official explanations? Why not hear from people who
had the wisdom to protest the invasion of Iraq and
condemn it in writing before it even began? People who
called the war illegal and immoral, said we should never
start it, and predicted much of the horrible outcome.
Surely they may have some insights and analyses that
will not be heard from the mouths of the usual suspects.
Likewise, why didn't the September 11 Committee, or any
of the congressional committees dealing with the
terrorist attack, call upon any of the numerous 9-11
experts who have done extensive research and who
question various aspects of the official story?
Traditionally, of course, such committees have been
formed to put a damper on dissident questioning of
official stories, to ridicule them as "conspiracy
theorists", not to give the dissidents a larger
audience.
William Blum is the author of:
Killing Hope: US Military and CIA
Interventions Since World War 2
-
Rogue State: A Guide to the
World's Only Superpower
- West-Bloc Dissident: A Cold War Memoir. Freeing
the World to Death: - Essays on the American Empire -
www.killinghope.org
NOTES
[1] Fars News Agency, November 21, 2006
[2] Senate Committee on
Veterans' Affairs, "Is Military Research Hazardous to
Veterans' Health? Lessons Spanning Half a Century",
December 8, 1994, p.5
[3] Ibid., passim
[4] Washington Post, October
2 and 23, 1996 and July 31, 1997 for the estimated
numbers of affected soldiers.
[5] "Journal of the American
Medical Association", September 1, 1999, p.822
[6] Washington Post,
December 20, 2006, p.19
[7] New York Times, December
22, 1989, p.17
[8] New York Times, December
22, 1989, p.16
[9] Los Angeles Times,
December 1, 1990, p.1
[10] Washington Post, May
28, 2003
[11] Washington Post,
January 1, 2007, p.1
[12] Washington Post, July
20, 2004, p.15, statement attributed to President Bush
in the Lancaster (Pa.) New Era newspaper from a private
meeting with Amish families on July 9. The White House
later said Bush said no such thing. Yes, we know how the
Amish lie.
[13] Los Angeles Times, June
7, 1991, p.1
[14] CBS "60 Minutes", May
12, 1996
[15] Associated Press,
December 22, 2006
[16] National Security
Archive -- www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/ -- Search <Ford
Timor>; William Blum, Rogue State, p.188-9
[17] New York Times,
September 17, 1974, p.22
[18] Washington Post,
January 10, 2007, p.7
[19] Washington Post, March
23, 2006, p.21
[20] Washington Post,
January 5, 2007
Comment Guidelines
Be succinct, constructive and relevant to the story. We encourage engaging, diverse and meaningful commentary. Do not include personal information such as names, addresses, phone numbers and emails. Comments falling outside our guidelines – those including personal attacks and profanity – are not permitted.
See our complete Comment Policy and use this link to notify us if you have concerns about a comment. We’ll promptly review and remove any inappropriate postings.