Misreading
The Enemy
By Juan Cole
01/14/07 "Mercury
News" -- -President Bush's escalation of
the Iraq War is premised on a profound misunderstanding
of who the enemies are, how to deal with them and what
the limits are of U.S. power.
The president cannot seem to let go of his fixation on
Al-Qaida, a minor actor in Iraq, and his determination
to confront Iran and Syria. He still assumes that the
insurgents are outsiders to their neighborhoods and that
U.S. troops can chase away the miscreants and keep them
out, acting as a sort of neighborhood watch in khaki. In
fact, Iraq's Sunni Arab elite is playing the spoiler,
and until a deal is negotiated with its members, no one
will be allowed to enjoy the new Iraq.
Scholars at the American Enterprise Institute, who from
the beginning spearheaded the U.S. invasion and
occupation of Iraq, express confidence that the United
States, which has a $12 trillion economy, an army over a
million strong, and a population of 300 million, can
overwhelm Iraq. They point out that Iraq only has an
economy of $100 billion, a population of 27 million, and
a guerrilla movement of just tens of thousands. This
comparison is deeply misleading, and it will get
thousands of Americans killed.
Guerrilla movements can succeed against much wealthier,
more populous and better-armed enemies, as happened in
Algeria in the late 1950s through 1962 when the National
Liberation Front expelled the French. The real question
is not America's supposed superiority (which so far has
not brought it victory) but what exactly the resources
and tactics of the enemy are and whether they can be
defeated. The answer to the second question is ``No.''
Who is the enemy in Iraq, exactly? In the first
instance, it is some 50 major Sunni Arab guerrilla
groups. These have names such as the 1920 Revolution
Brigades, the Army of Muhammad, and the Holy Warrior
Council. Some are rooted in the Baath party, an Arab
nationalist and socialist party that had ruled Iraq
since 1968. Others have a base in city quarters or in
rural clans. Some are made up of fundamentalist Muslims.
One calls itself ``Al-Qaida'' but has no real links to
Osama bin Laden and his organization, and has simply
adopted the name. The Baathists and neo-Baathists, led
by Izzat Ibrahim al-Douri (once a right-hand man of
Saddam Hussein), are probably the most important and
deadliest of these guerrilla groups.
These guerrilla cells are rooted in the Sunni Arab
sector, some 20 percent of Iraq's population, which had
enjoyed centuries of dominance in Iraq. From it came the
high bureaucrats, the managers of companies, the officer
corps, the people who know how to get things done. They
know where some 200,000 remaining tons of hidden
explosives are, secreted around the country by the
former regime. They are for the most part unable to
accept being ruled by what they see as a new government
of Shiite ayatollahs and Kurdish warlords, or being
occupied by the U.S. Army and Marines. These Iraqi
Sunnis enjoy the support of millions of committed and
sometimes wealthy co-religionists in Syria, Jordan,
Saudi Arabia and the oil kingdoms of the Persian Gulf.
The Sunni Arab guerrilla cells have successfully pursued
a spoiler strategy in Iraq. By engaging in
assassinations, firefights and bombings, they have made
it clear that if they are not happy in the new Iraq, no
one is going to be. Did U.S. engineers repair
electricity stations? The Sunni guerrillas sabotaged
them. Did the new regime attempt to export petroleum
from the northern city of Kirkuk through Turkey? The
guerrillas hit the pipelines. Did the U.S. military
attempt to plant 50 bases around the country? The cells
targeted them for mortar attacks and roadside bombs,
inflicting a steady and horrible attrition, leaving more
than 25,000 GIs killed or wounded.
Focus on towns and cities
The Sunni guerrillas took over territory where they
could, mainly concentrating on villages, towns and city
quarters in the center, north and west of the country.
At some points, cities like Al-Fallujah and much of
Ar-Ramadi, Al-Hadithah, Samarra and Tikrit have been at
least in part under their control. They have entire
districts of Mosul and Baghdad. They have attempted to
cut the capital off from fuel, and they steal and
smuggle petroleum to support their war. In areas they
only partly control, or in enemy areas, they set off
bombs or send in death squads to make object lessons of
opponents.
The guerrillas know they cannot fight the U.S. military
head-on. But they do not need to. They know something
that the Americans could not entirely understand. Iraq
is a country of clans and tribes, of Hatfields and
McCoys, of grudges and feuds. The clans are more
important than religious identities such as Sunni or
Shiite. They are more important than ethnicities such as
Kurdish or Arab or Turkmen. All members of the clan are
honor-bound to defend or avenge all the other members.
They are bands not of brothers but of cousins.
The guerrillas mobilized these clans against the U.S.
troops and against one another. Is a U.S. platoon
traveling through a neighborhood of the Dulaim clan,
where people are out shopping? They hit the convoy, and
the panicked troops lay down fire around them. They kill
members of the Dulaim clan. They are now defined as the
American tribe, and they now have a feud with the Dulaim.
Members of the Dulaim cannot hold their heads up high
until they avenge the deaths of their cousins by killing
Americans.
Unbelievable cruelty
The guerrillas also provoke clan feuds between adherents
of the two major sects of Islam, the Sunni and the
Shiite. They pursue this goal with unbelievable cruelty.
They will blow up a big marriage party held by a Shiite
clan, killing bride, groom and revelers. They know that
Muslims try to bury the dead the same day, so there will
be a funeral. They blow up the funeral, too. The Shiite
clan knows who the Sunni clans are that support the
insurgency.
The Shiites who have been attacked then join the radical
Mahdi Army out of anger and fear, and send death squads
at night to take revenge on the Sunni clan. If American
troops step in to stop the Shiites from taking revenge,
that produces a feud between the U.S. and the Shiite
clans. The ordinary Sunnis under attack from the
vengeful Shiite death squads turn for protection to the
Sunni guerrillas. The deliberately provoked feuds have
the effect of mobilizing the Sunni Arabs and garnering
their support for the guerrillas.
The guerrillas have opened fronts against the Americans,
against the police and army of the new government and
against the Shiites. There is a third front, in Mosul
and Kirkuk, against the Kurds. The guerrillas hit
Kirkuk's oil pipelines, police, political party
headquarters and ordinary Kurds in hopes of keeping the
Kurdistan Regional Government from annexing oil-rich
Kirkuk to itself.
U.S. soldiers cannot stop the Sunni Arab guerrilla cells
from setting bombs or assassinating people. That is
clear after nearly four years. And since they cannot
stop them, they also are powerless to halt the growing
number of intense clan and religious feuds. The United
States cannot stop the sabotage that hurts petroleum
exports in the north and stops electricity from being
delivered for more than a few hours a day.
President Bush in his speech Wednesday imagined that
guerrillas were coming into neighborhoods in Baghdad and
in the cities of Al-Anbar province from the outside. He
suggested that, as the solution to this problem, U.S.
and Iraqi troops should clear them out and then hold the
city quarters for some time, to stop them from coming
back. But the guerrillas are not outsiders. They are the
people of those city quarters, who keep guns in their
closets and come out masked at night to engage in
killing and sabotage.
Security comes first
Bush believes that $1 billion invested in a jobs program
will generate employment that would make young men less
likely to succumb to the blandishments of the guerrilla
recruiters. But without security you cannot have a
thriving economy of the sort that produces jobs, and any
money you put into such a situation will just be
frittered away. The guerrillas often make $300 a month,
a very good salary in today's Iraq. There is little
likelihood that Bush's jobs program will generate many
jobs that will draw Iraqis away from their guerrilla
groups and militias. For a lot of them, serving is a
matter of neighborhood protection or ideological
commitment. Not everything is about money.
Another reason that Bush's $1 billion for jobs is not
that impressive is that Iran is offering Iraq $1 billion
in aid as well. And guerrillas in the southern port of
Basra are estimated to be stealing and smuggling $2
billion a year from the city's oil facilities. Add all
that sort of thing up, and the United States is being
outspent by a wide margin.
Since the Sunni Arab guerrillas cannot be defeated or
stopped from provoking massive clan feuds that
destabilize the country, there is only one way out of
the quagmire. The United States and the Shiite
government of Iraq must negotiate a mutually
satisfactory settlement with the Sunni Arab guerrilla
leaders. Those talks would be easier if the guerrillas
would form a civil political party to act as their
spokesman. They should be encouraged to do so. Their
first and most urgent demand is that the United States
set a timetable for withdrawal of its troops. The United
States should take them up on their offer to talk once a
timetable is announced.
Bush's commitment of more than 20,000 troops is intended
to address only one of the guerrillas' tactics, taking
and holding neighborhoods. At that, he is concentrating
on only a small part of the Sunni Arab territories. The
guerrillas do not need to hold such neighborhoods to
continue to engage in sabotage and the provocation of
artificial feuds.
As long as the Sunni Arabs of Iraq are so deeply
unhappy, they will simply generate more guerrillas over
time. Bush is depending on military tactics to win a war
that can only be won by negotiation.
© 2007 MercuryNews.com and wire service sources. All
Rights Reserved.
Comment Guidelines
Be succinct, constructive and relevant to the story. We encourage engaging, diverse and meaningful commentary. Do not include personal information such as names, addresses, phone numbers and emails. Comments falling outside our guidelines – those including personal attacks and profanity – are not permitted.
See our complete Comment Policy and use this link to notify us if you have concerns about a comment. We’ll promptly review and remove any inappropriate postings.