Fear climate
change, not our enemies
By Robert Fisk
01/20/07 "The
Independent" -- - It was a warning.
Scratched, of course after more than 50 years, but a
home movie, shot by my mother in colour. But most of the
colour is white. Bill Fisk, the 57-year-old borough
treasurer of Maidstone, is standing in the garden of our
home in his long black office coat, wearing - as always
- his First World War regimental tie, throwing snow
balls at his son. I am 10 years old, in short trousers
but up to my waist in snow. There must have been two
feet of it in the garden. You can even see the
condensation from my mouth. My mother doesn't appear on
the film of course. She is standing in the snow behind
my father, 36 years old, the daughter of café
proprietors who every Boxing Day would host my own and
my aunt's family with a huge lunch and a roaring log
fire. It really was cold then.
I think was it Andrew Marr, when editor of The
Independent, who first made me think about what was
happening. It was a stiflingly hot summer and I had just
arrived in London from Beirut and commented that there
wasn't much difference in temperature. And Andrew turned
round and pointed across the city. "Something's gone
wrong with the bloody weather!" he roared. And of
course, he was right.
Now I acknowledge it silently: the great storms that
sweep across Europe, the weird turbulence that my
passenger jet pilots experience high over the Atlantic.
Because I have never travelled so far or so frequently,
I notice that at year's end it's 15 degrees in Toronto
and Montreal - a "springtime Christmas", the Canadian
papers announce in a land famous for its tundra. In
Denver, the airport is blocked by snowfalls. I return to
Lebanon to find so little snow has fallen that much of
Mount Sannine above my home is the colour of grey rock,
just a dressing of white on the top. The snow is deep in
Jerusalem. There is a water shortage in Beirut.
How casually these warnings come to us. How casually we
treat them. I suspect that most people feel so detached
from political power - so hopeless when faced with a
world tragedy - they can do nothing but watch in growing
anger and distress. Water levels in the world's oceans
may rise 20 feet higher, we are told. And I calculate
that in Beirut, the Mediterranean - in rough weather --
will be splashing over my second-floor balcony wall.
I curl down deep in my bed, because the nights are
strangely damp and read by the bedside light, Hans von
Sponeck's gripping, painful account of his years as the
UN's Humanitarian Coordinator for Iraq, A Different Kind
of War, an analysis of the vicious, criminal sanctions
regime levelled against the Iraqi people between 1990
and 2003. Here, for example, is what Sergei Lavrov, the
Russian ambassador to the UN wrote in March 2000:
"...the scale of the humanitarian catastrophe in Iraq is
inexorably leading to the disintegration of the very
fabric of civil society." It was "a situation where an
entire generation of Iraqis has been physically and
morally crippled". The French ambassador to the UN,
Alain Dejammet, spoke similarly of "the very serious
humanitarian crisis in Iraq", a crime that would
eventually persuade von Sponeck to resign.
Another warning. I remember how von Sponeck said the
very same words to me in Baghdad. So did Denis Halliday,
his predecessor. But when Peter Hain - now so
desperately anxious to distance himself from US policies
in Iraq - was asked to comment, he said that von Sponeck
and Halliday were "obviously not the right men for the
job". James Rubin, then earning his keep as Madeleine
Albright's spokesman, said that von Sponeck "is paid to
work, not to speak".
Yet there are all the warnings. Did we really think that
after we had impoverished them and destroyed so many of
their children; after a generation of Iraqis had been
"physically and morally crippled", they were going to
welcome our "liberation"? From this wreckage of Iraq was
bound to come the insurgencies and the hatreds now
tearing its people apart and destroying the presidency
of George W. Bush and the prime ministership of Tony
Blair.
Yet what do they tell us? They still want us to be
frightened. Terror, terror, terror. Now we have Doctor
Death, our Home Secretary, telling us that the War on
Terror could last as long as the Cold War. Recently, it
was the Dowager of Fear in charge of our intelligence
services who said that the War on Terror could last "a
generation". So that's 30 years? Or 60 like Dr Death
claimed? Bush claimed it might last "forever", surely an
ambitious goal for an ex- governor-executioner.
What these men know, of course, while waffling about our
"values", is that the only way to lessen the risk of
attack in London or Washington is to adopt a moral, just
policy towards the Middle East. Failure to do this - and
the Blairs and the Bushes clearly have no intention of
doing so - means that we will be bombed again. And the
words of Dr Death were not a warning to us. They were
not intended to prepare us for the future. They were
intended to allow him to say "told you so" when the next
backpacker murders the innocent on the London tube
system. And then we will be told that we need even
harsher legislation. And we will have to be afraid.
Yes, we must fear. We must wake every morning in fear.
We must bend our entire political system into a machine
of fear. Organised society must revolve around our fear.
Like the terrorologists of old - the Claire Sterlings
and Brian Croziers of this world who told us of
thousands of terrorists, "bands of professional
practitioners dispensing violent death", all trained in
Cuba, North Korea, the Soviet Union or Eastern Europe -
Dr Death and Lord Blair of Kut al-Amara and former
foreign secretary Jack "the Veil" Straw (remember him?)
- want us to live in fear. They want us to be afraid.
I think we should be afraid - of what we are doing to
our planet. But we should not fear our enemies in the
world. They will return. Our western occupation of so
many Muslim lands have assured us of this fate. But if
we can now end our injustice in the Middle East, Dr
Death's 60 years could be over before he leaves his high
office. Now there's a thought.
Meanwhile, watch the world and the weather and the
turbulence at high altitude. And remember the snow in
Maidstone.
© 2006 Independent News and Media Limited
Comment Guidelines
Be succinct, constructive and relevant to the story. We encourage engaging, diverse and meaningful commentary. Do not include personal information such as names, addresses, phone numbers and emails. Comments falling outside our guidelines – those including personal attacks and profanity – are not permitted.
See our complete Comment Policy and use this link to notify us if you have concerns about a comment. We’ll promptly review and remove any inappropriate postings.