The Project for the New American Century.
here for other articles on this topic
The People versus the Powerful is the oldest story in human
history. At no point in history have the Powerful wielded so much
control. At no point in history has the active and informed
involvement of the People, all of them, been more absolutely
By William Rivers Pitt
02/25/03 -- - The Project
for the New American Century, or PNAC, is a Washington-based think
tank created in 1997. Above all else, PNAC desires and demands one
thing: The establishment of a global American empire to bend the
will of all nations. They chafe at the idea that the United States,
the last remaining superpower, does not do more by way of economic
and military force to bring the rest of the world under the umbrella
of a new socio-economic Pax Americana.
The fundamental essence of PNAC's ideology can be found in a White
Paper produced in September of 2000 entitled "Rebuilding America's
Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century." In it,
PNAC outlines what is required of America to create the global
empire they envision. According to PNAC, America must:
* Reposition permanently based forces to Southern Europe, Southeast
Asia and the Middle East;
* Modernize U.S. forces, including enhancing our fighter aircraft,
submarine and surface fleet capabilities;
* Develop and deploy a global missile defense system, and develop a
strategic dominance of space;
* Control the "International Commons" of cyberspace;
* Increase defense spending to a minimum of 3.8 percent of gross
domestic product, up from the 3 percent currently spent.
Most ominously, this PNAC document described four "Core Missions"
for the American military. The two central requirements are for
American forces to "fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous
major theater wars," and to "perform the 'constabulary' duties
associated with shaping the security environment in critical
regions." Note well that PNAC does not want America to be prepared
to fight simultaneous major wars. That is old school. In order to
bring this plan to fruition, the military must fight these wars one
way or the other to establish American dominance for all to see.
Why is this important? After all, wacky think tanks are a cottage
industry in Washington, DC. They are a dime a dozen. In what way
does PNAC stand above the other groups that would set American
foreign policy if they could? Two events brought PNAC into the
mainstream of American government: the disputed election of George
W. Bush, and the attacks of September 11th. When Bush assumed the
Presidency, the men who created and nurtured the imperial dreams of
PNAC became the men who run the Pentagon, the Defense Department and
the White House. When the Towers came down, these men saw, at long
last, their chance to turn their White Papers into substantive
Vice President Dick Cheney is a founding member of PNAC, along with
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Defense Policy Board chairman
Richard Perle. Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz is the
ideological father of the group. Bruce Jackson, a PNAC director,
served as a Pentagon official for Ronald Reagan before leaving
government service to take a leading position with the weapons
manufacturer Lockheed Martin.
PNAC is staffed by men who previously served with groups like
Friends of the Democratic Center in Central America, which supported
America's bloody gamesmanship in Nicaragua and El Salvador, and with
groups like The Committee for the Present Danger, which spent years
advocating that a nuclear war with the Soviet Union was "winnable."
PNAC has recently given birth to a new group, The Committee for the
Liberation of Iraq, which met with National Security Advisor
Condoleezza Rice in order to formulate a plan to "educate" the
American populace about the need for war in Iraq. CLI has funneled
millions of taxpayer dollars to support the Iraqi National Congress
and the Iraqi heir presumptive, Ahmed Chalabi. Chalabi was sentenced
in absentia by a Jordanian court in 1992 to
22 years in prison for bank fraud after the collapse of Petra Bank,
which he founded in 1977. Chalabi has not set foot in Iraq since
1956, but his Enron-like business credentials apparently make him a
good match for the Bush administration's plans.
PNAC's "Rebuilding America's Defenses" report is the
institutionalization of plans and ideologies that have been
formulated for decades by the men currently running American
government. The PNAC Statement of Principles is signed by Cheney,
Wolfowitz and Rumsfeld, as well as by Eliot Abrams, Jeb Bush, Bush's
special envoy to Afghanistan Zalmay Khalilzad, and many others.
William Kristol, famed conservative writer for the Weekly Standard,
is also a co-founder of the group. The Weekly Standard is owned by
Ruppert Murdoch, who also owns international media giant Fox News.
The desire for these freshly empowered PNAC men to extend American
hegemony by force of arms across the globe has been there since day
one of the Bush administration, and is in no small part a central
reason for the Florida electoral battle in 2000. Note that while
many have said that Gore and Bush are ideologically identical, Mr.
Gore had no ties whatsoever to the fellows at PNAC. George W. Bush
had to win that election by any means necessary, and PNAC signatory
Jeb Bush was in the perfect position to ensure the rise to
prominence of his fellow imperialists. Desire for such action,
however, is by no means translatable into workable policy. Americans
enjoy their comforts, but don't cotton to the idea of being some
sort of Neo-Rome.
On September 11th, the fellows from PNAC saw a door of opportunity
open wide before them, and stormed right through it.
Bush released on September 20th 2001 the "National Security Strategy
of the United States of America." It is an ideological match to
PNAC's "Rebuilding America's Defenses" report issued a year earlier.
In many places, it uses exactly the same language to describe
America's new place in the world.
Recall that PNAC demanded an increase in defense spending to at
least 3.8% of GDP. Bush's proposed budget for next year asks for
$379 billion in defense spending, almost exactly 3.8% of GDP.
In August of 2002, Defense Policy Board chairman and PNAC member
Richard Perle heard a policy briefing from a think tank associated
with the Rand Corporation. According to the Washington Post and The
Nation, the final slide of this presentation described "Iraq as the
tactical pivot, Saudi Arabia as the strategic pivot, and Egypt as
the prize" in a war that would purportedly be about ridding the
world of Saddam Hussein's weapons. Bush has deployed massive forces
into the Mideast region, while simultaneously engaging American
forces in the Philippines and playing nuclear chicken with North
Korea. Somewhere in all this lurks at least one of the "major
theater wars" desired by the September 2000 PNAC report.
Iraq is but the beginning, a pretense for a wider conflict. Donald
Kagan, a central member of PNAC, sees America establishing permanent
military bases in Iraq after the war. This is purportedly a measure
to defend the peace in the Middle East, and to make sure the oil
flows. The nations in that region, however, will see this for what
it is: a jump-off point for American forces to invade any nation in
that region they choose to. The American people, anxiously awaiting
some sort of exit plan after America defeats Iraq, will see too late
that no exit is planned.
All of the horses are traveling together at speed here. The defense
contractors who sup on American tax revenue will be handsomely paid
for arming this new American empire. The corporations that own the
news media will sell this eternal war at a profit, as viewership
goes through the stratosphere when there is combat to be shown.
Those within the administration who believe that the defense of
Israel is contingent upon laying waste to every possible aggressor
in the region will have their dreams fulfilled. The PNAC men who
wish for a global Pax Americana at gunpoint will see their plans
unfold. Through it all, the bankrollers from the WTO and the IMF
will be able to dictate financial terms to the entire planet. This
last aspect of the plan is pivotal, and is best described in the
newly revised version of Greg Palast's masterpiece, "The Best
Democracy Money Can Buy."
There will be adverse side effects. The siege mentality average
Americans are suffering as they smother behind yards of plastic
sheeting and duct tape will increase by orders of magnitude as our
aggressions bring forth new terrorist attacks against the homeland.
These attacks will require the implementation of the newly drafted
Patriot Act II, an augmentation of the previous Act that has
profoundly sharper teeth. The sun will set on the Constitution and
Bill of Rights.
The American economy will be ravaged by the need for increased
defense spending, and by the aforementioned "constabulary" duties in
Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere. Former allies will turn on us.
Germany, France and the other nations resisting this Iraq war are
fully aware of this game plan. They are not acting out of cowardice
or because they love Saddam Hussein, but because they mean to resist
this rising American empire, lest they face economic and military
serfdom at the hands of George W. Bush. Richard Perle has already
stated that France is no longer an American ally.
As the eagle spreads its wings, our rhetoric and their resistance
will become more agitated and dangerous.
Many people, of course, will die. They will die from war and from
want, from famine and disease. At home, the social fabric will be
torn in ways that make the Reagan nightmares of crack addiction,
homelessness and AIDS seem tame by comparison.
This is the price to be paid for empire, and the men of PNAC who now
control the fate and future of America are more than willing to pay
it. For them, the benefits far outweigh the liabilities.
The plan was running smoothly until those two icebergs collided.
Millions and millions of ordinary people are making it very
difficult for Bush's international allies to keep to the script.
PNAC may have designs for the control of the "International Commons"
of the Internet, but for now it is the staging ground for a movement
that would see empire take a back seat to a wise peace, human
rights, equal protection under the law, and the preponderance of a
justice that will, if properly applied, do away forever with the
anger and hatred that gives birth to terrorism in the first place.
Tommaso Palladini of Milan perhaps said it best as he marched with
his countrymen in Rome. "You fight terrorism," he said, "by creating
more justice in the world."
The People versus the Powerful is the oldest story in human history.
At no point in history have the Powerful wielded so much control. At
no point in history has the active and informed involvement of the
People, all of them, been more absolutely required. The tide can be
stopped, and the men who desire empire by the sword can be thwarted.
It has already begun, but it must not cease. These are men of will,
and they do not intend to fail.
William Rivers Pitt is a New York Times bestselling author of two
books - "War On Iraq" (with Scott Ritter) available now from Context
Books, and "The Greatest Sedition is Silence," available in May 2003
from Pluto Press. He teaches high school in Boston, MA. Scott Lowery
contributed research to this report.
New comment section added
July 24, 2012
|Scroll down to add your comments - Please read our Comment Policy before posting -
on "comments" below to
read or post comments
Be succinct, constructive and
relevant to the story.
encourage engaging, diverse and
meaningful commentary. Do not
include personal information such
as names, addresses, phone
numbers and emails. Comments
falling outside our guidelines
those including personal
attacks and profanity are
See our complete
this link to notify us if you
have concerns about a comment.
Well promptly review and
remove any inappropriate