Jewish media myths leading us toward World War III

By John Kaminski
skylax@comcast.net


Lately I have involved myself in topics about which I seem to offend
partisans on both sides of the same question.

As a journalist, this gives me great satisfaction, because true
objectivity demands constructive criticism of both sides of any
given issue, and in this I often succeed. But as a human being, it
frustrates me that everybody from all points of the political
spectrum can be so blindly biased; so unwilling to admit their own
faults; so profoundly dense not to see that other people's arguments are
often the same as their own though couched in different terms; so
lacking in understanding, empathy, and fairness; so selfishly parochial
as a new unprecedented worldwide disaster closes in on us.

Like, why should the United States have the right to declare other
nations not suited to possess weapons of mass destruction? Or, why
should one country have them (Israel) and another country not (Iraq)?
Does it all hinge on Condoleezza Rice's statement that we are a nation
of truth and goodness and can determine what is right for everyone? And
what of those who disagree? Are they wrong? Are they evil? Isn't the
United States the country most likely to use weapons of mass
destruction?

No wonder there are so many wars. Everybody says they're listening, but
nobody's hearing anything, because everyone's
consciousness is set up in such a way that they believe they are right,
and anybody who says anything else is automatically
an evil enemy. Objectivity seems to be an impossibility, determined
entirely by those who control the methods of communication.

This process of getting caught in the middle of these kinds of arguments
and being blasted from both sides regularly
happens to me because I consort with people from all angles of the
political spectrum, from pistol packing Patriots to
grandmoms eager to lay in the street in front of tanks. Both groups, the
nobility of whose motives are not really to be questioned, routinely
fall into the careless use of stereotypes to characterize the nefarious
forces they believe oppress them.

The Patriots call the Clintons Communists when they are actually cynical
stooges for corporate totalitarians, and the lefties
tag those on the way-right as selfish gun-toting racists when they are
actually arguing for principles that would enrich all our
lives. But seen from a slightly different angle, those same Patriots
(and libertarians, too) become shills for those very
processes that now threaten to plunge the world into the darkness of
war, and liberal lefties - who preach that if we all don't
make it to freedom and security, none of us are going to make it - are
all too often oblivious to the destruction of individual
rights that they themselves espouse in their political campaigns. Never
the twain seems to meet.

Anyway, the latest tar baby that has attached itself to my butt involves
really kind of a toss-off line I used in my last essay
about "The Dead Zone," when I waxed poetic that I was sitting on the
shore of Vichy France waiting for the American
bombers to arrive and change the nature of the world. To those certain
few of my e-penpals who have identified with my
previous critiques of Israel's fascist behavior throughout recent
decades, it was as if I'd blasphemed the messiah.

How could I denigrate Hitler, when he was clearly a victim of the
Western chapter of the worldwide Jewish conspiracy which
set him up to take the big fall?

Whoa, Nellie! Just because I happen to believe in that worldwide Jewish
conspiracy doesn't mean I have to believe that the
little fruitcake with the funny mustache was a good guy. I mean, nobody
made him invade France, Poland, Czechoslovakia
and all those other countries. Nobody made him preach a gospel of racial
superiority (that now, very oddly, seems to have
been adopted by the Jews) and herd his little coterie of black-uniformed
twits into venom-spewing, hate-mongering robots
out to obliterate the rest of the world.

No conspiracy made him do that. He took the ball and ran with it.

Just because I believe that Western business interests have manipulated
worldwide markets and armies into numerous wars
doesn't make me a fan of someone who wanted to take over the world.

But the real reason I can't identify with Hitler is that I can see from
his philosophical descendants that he was pure, insane
evil. And who are those philosophical descendants? Well, they are the
Bush family, tied into the Hitler legacy through the
second Bush president's forebears, Herbert Walker and Prescott Bush, who
both made millions off their backing of
German businesses during World War II. This is no fiction. Do a Google
search. It's easy to find. These are Hitler's real
philosophical descendants: the pro-war, Zionist Christian Republican
establishment.

The Nazi legacy was passed to the conquering Americans through the CIA
and the Dulles brothers, and the American space
program, which wouldn't have succeeded without the help of German
scientists. Nazi principles live on in the American
corporate establishment, which condones absolutely anything in the name
of profit and now has been given its favorite Nazi gift: the indefinite
imprisonment (or even murder) of mere suspects without trial or appeal.

Yes, I can believe there was funny stuff going on prior to WW II
involving Jewish control of the media and the financial
markets that uncannily reflects what is going on now. I know about the
implications of the Balfour declaration: Germany would have won World
War I, except that Jewish interests got the U.S. to enter the war after
Britain made a secret promise to Zionists that they could have
Palestine. But no, despite what was major provocative Jewish propaganda
against him, I still believe Hitler was a white racist bent on
destroying anybody who didn't have the kind of genetic heritage he
preferred (and didn't even possess himself).

But just because I revile Hitler doesn't mean I believe the fictions the
Jewish dominated media have spun about the Holocaust. I have been driven
irrevocably into the category of Holocaust denier (a 1947 AP story said
875,000 Jews were killed in Germany during WW II) simply because of the
way the Jewish community has trumpeted its martyrdom for financial gain,
how the Jewish community has destroyed freedom of speech in a dozen
European countries by making it a crime to talk about the events that
led up to World War II.

I mean, if what the Jews were saying were actually true, they wouldn't
need to pass laws to prevent their opponents from
talking about it. They'd simply defeat them in an empirical argument, or
in a court of law.

But to pass laws about talking about the events of World War II ... I
mean, that's almost as bad as George W. Bush preventing a thorough
investigation into the events of 9/11/2001. It's a certain admission of
guilt, an undeniable indication of a falsehood being perpetrated.

I submit the degree to which a reader of this may be horrified by this
pronouncement is exactly the degree to which this
same reader has been indoctrinated by media myths that severely alter
the truth.

And when you realize that the Jewish community has stamped out freedom
of speech throughout much of Europe, you
naturally have to ask what that same group has done to legitimate
political debate in the United States of America.

Back in World War II, there never was much coverage about how Eisenhower
let two million Germans starve to death in French prison camps that
didn't even ahve buildings or latrines, an event surely as shameful as
German concentration camps.

It's more of the same today. Nothing on TV or the big newspapers about
the investigations into 9/11 or the anthrax murders, no coverage of the
Palestinians being caged up in prison camps and murdered
indiscriminately by bulldozers and helicopters on a daily basis, and not
an audible peep about how it is Israel that has violated U.N. mandates
about weapons of mass destruction and inhuman treatment of political
prisoners. Yet the U.S. gives Israel so much money ($14 billion per
year) that it has begun to tip over the entire American economy, and
still not a peep in the American mass media ... because it is totally
controlled by Jewish interests. This is not an exaggeration, no matter
what trendy, left-leaning mass media observers like FAIR have to say
about it.

But that still doesn't mean I have to like Hitler, or think he was right
about anything, least of all Aryan superiority.

Same deal with Saddam. I can rail against how unjust and immoral the
continuing target practice against Iraq is without
saying anything nice about the Iraqi leader. Hell, the worst thing I can
say about him was that he was a partner of the Bush
family in acquiring weapons of mass destruction for his war against the
truly legitimate democracy of Iran.

So, the Nazis say I'm soft on Israel because I don't like Hitler, and
Jews call me an anti-Semite because I don't like Israeli
soldiers putting bullets through the heads of old ladies and little
babies. Everywhere I look I'm busted.

Anti-Semite. Hah. That's a laugh.

As many observers have written recently, an anti-Semite used to mean
someone who hated Jews because they were Jews. Now, the term anti-Semite
is used by Jews to tar and feather anyone who disagrees with Jewish
policies, influences, and effects. Complain about Israelis burying alive
Palestinian residents of Jenin and Jews say you're an anti-Semite.
Wonder about the preponderance of Jewish influence on the American
government and you're an anti-Semite. Worst of all were the recent
remarks by Harvard president Lawrence Summers and his henchman Alan
Dershowitz, who decried the recent rise of anti-Semitism. All this means
to me is that Harvard is no longer a great university, but just another
influential vehicle for Jewish propaganda. Check out the school's Enron
investments sometime.

It's not a rise of anti-Semitism; it's a rise of disgust by thoughtful
people who are appalled by the Jewish failure to admit the appalling
crimes against humanity their Israeli cousins are perpetrating against
the dark-skinned peoples of the region, and their political double
agents are doing to the integrity of the American government.

This is a smokescreen kind of lie in which Jews exploited the so-called
Holocaust for a kind of political immunity. Let's be nice to them
because they've had a hard time, everyone was encouraged to think. And
now we have more of the same: a worldwide wave of anti-Semitism used to
camouflage obvious genocide in the Middle East.

I'm not an anti-Semite. I'm anti-Israel, an illegal nation which has
inherited all the worst traits of Hitler's regime and passed them onto
the United States. And I'm anti-Jew because there are so few Jews with
the honesty to admit their beloved sanctuary of Israel is a lethal
menace to every decent nation and ethnic group on earth, including
itself. This too is a Jewish legacy that has been successfully passed to
the United States.

Anti-Semite. That's a good one.

Jews aren't Semites at all; they're Turkic Mongols, who stormed their
way across Asia with Genghis Khan 1500 years ago,
became Khazars in the Ukraine a thousand years ago, adopted Judaism as a
political strategy, then infiltrated eastern Europe,
always ashamed of their Oriental lineage, which they have done their
best to conceal.

But it's no secret; they're still behaving like Genghis Khan, taking
what they want and lying about it. They picked up a lot of
good pointers from Hitler, that's all. They have become like Hitler, but
they always were like Hitler, because they're a lot like
Genghis Khan, the greatest butcher of all time (although the Bushes are
in the running), because they're descended from him.

It's a terrible hoax, just like the Holocaust. Zionists had an office at
Hitler's headquarters to funnel a "chosen" few to
Palestine. And because Zionists controlled the American media, we fell
for the myth of the Holocaust, although it wasn't really introduced into
the public until 20 years after the war ended. Just like we're falling
for it now - Israel freedom fighters against Palestinian terrorists.
Hah. Israelis are stealing Palestinian land. They, and we, are the real
terrorists.

America, controlled by Israel, is the genuine terrorist threat, just
like the Christian crusaders of long ago were the real terrorists
butchering the indigenous inhabitants of Arabia and India. Just look at
any of the current polls. The whole world
knows the real axis of evil: America, Britain and Israel, trying to
bribe the whole world into seeing things in their ugly way. Everybody
knows this except the American people, who are kept in the dark by
Jewish media.

We are the real terrorists, people. Time to wake up.

Having said all this, I can't fault the Jews for being to any great
degree worse than anyone else. Consider the Europeans,
from whom most of you reading this are descended. Consider the European
heritage from an American Indian perspective.

Who are the real killers now? Who are the true manipulators now? Pass
out the smallpox blankets, people. Just plead guilty
and take the deal. It's too late to argue. The verdict has been in for
more than a century. It's just that you don't hear it because
the media are all controlled by Europeans and Jews, trying hard to tell
us what great folks we are, and how we have the right
to destroy the world in order to rule. Just like Genghis Khan. We are
all descended from Genghis Khan. Or Charlemagne.
Same difference.

I don't have to prove any of this to anyone, because I don't want to
kill anyone to defend a deep dark secret, and they do.
They want to kill to take what they want so they can keep their deep
dark secret.

Nothing gets fixed until the secret gets exposed. The secret is this:
there are no colors and no nationalities. We are all
members of the same tribe. Those who establish differences are just
trying to make money off conflict. It's no more complex
than that.

But in this game of political roulette happening right now on the eve of
World War III, it's just a case of heads they win, tails
we lose. It's a coin flip we can't win. The minute you turn on the TV or
open a well-known newspaper, the game is fixed. Reasons to kill are
plentiful and continually repeated: "They hate our freedom."

I'm going to lose the argument no matter what I say, because everyone
has been conditioned to believe that there has to be
good and there has to be evil. No one - or damn few, anyway - have even
considered the possibility that the striving for
this "good" is the very thing that creates the "evil."

Consider this conversation I had with two schoolteachers the other
night. Of course, I managed to offend both of them. One
asked me what to do about children he could not reach, because they were
only interested in computer-game retribution and
seeing things in black and white.

I told him he wouldn't gain their confidence until he convinced them he
believed there was a conspiracy against them.
Silence followed. All teenagers know there's a conspiracy against them.
They feel like adults but they're treated like kids. It's only the
adults who pretend there isn't a conspiracy. And there is a conspiracy:
kids are honest, adults are not. These same adults are the ones who wave
the flag and support war.

I can argue til I'm blue in the face that the human race has been
conditioned to look to war and conflict as a way to solve its
problems, but until each one of us in an actualized way realizes that we
die and are not going to some holy place in the sky
because we've exterminated those we've decided are infidels or enemies,
nothing is going to get fixed, no message of peace
- no matter how articulate and compassionate - is ever going to get
through to us, because we're always going to have that
enemy to be vanquished - even though the true enemy is always ourselves.

My response was greeted with uncomfortable silence. I had given them the
right answer, but they couldn't even hear it. It
made me wonder what myths they would actually teach.

So this is how I manage to offend people on both sides of the same
issue. I like to think it's good journalism, which is more important to
me than whether you like me, or agree with me.

And damn! I think I've just done it again.


    John Kaminski is a writer who lives on the coast of Florida and
belongs to no political party, no religion, and - would
that he could - no particular nationality or ethnic group.