Blackmailing Bush; how the
"Dear Leader" conned "The Decider"
By Mike Whitney
02/16/07 "ICH" -- - The Bush foreign policy is
predicated on one simple axiom: “We will stop the
world’s most dangerous men from getting their hands on
the world’s most dangerous weapons”. By that standard,
Bush’s dealings with North Korea have been a wretched
failure. After 6 years of fruitless saber rattling and
belligerence, the North detonated a nuclear bomb in
early October and put region on notice that there’s a
new member in the nuclear weapons club.
For the time being, only South Korea and Japan are
within range of the North’s missile systems, but as the
technology improves the Taepodong 2 will eventually be
capable of hitting mainland U.S.A. The bottom line is
that the American people are considerably less safe with
a nuclear armed DPRK (Democratic People’s Republic of
Korea) than they were before.
The Bush administration has had ample time to take steps
to negotiate a settlement between the two traditional
adversaries. Instead, they chose to aggravate the
situation by trying to topple the regime by freezing
bank accounts and enforcing punitive “unilateral”
sanctions.
Unsurprisingly, Bush’s ham-fisted tactics have produced
the opposite result of what was intended. The North
rushed ahead with its research and quickly figured out
the basic elements of nuclear bomb-production allowing
the madcap dictator in the oversized sun-glasses to
build a stockpile of between 6 to 12 nuclear weapons.
Now the entire region is on tenterhooks and frantically
trying to cobble together a diplomatic solution.
The Bush administration has stubbornly refused to sit
down in one-on-one negotiations with the North. Their
refusal was supposed to send a message that the U.S. is
just “too important” to engage a vassal state like North
Korea in serious dialogue. Bush further strained
relations by including the North on its “axis of evil”
list which includes the states that the US has
designated as targets for regime change.
Additionally, Vice President Cheney delivered a blunt
warning to Kim in a speech he delivered early last year.
He said, “We don’t negotiate with evil; we defeat it.”
What could be clearer?
Given the administration’s blatant hostility, Kim Jung
Il did what any leader would do if they were facing a
similar existential threat; he developed a credible
deterrent to US aggression, nuclear weapons. His
research was undoubtedly hurried along by Bush’s
bellicosity.
Immediately following October’s nuclear blast, the Bush
administration reversed its policy and sent a messenger
to the North Korean Embassy to see if they would be
willing to conduct secret “bilateral” negotiations in
Berlin. Bush was desperately trying to avoid the
appearance that he had completely caved in on a matter
of principle, but the facts are not in dispute. Bush’s
sudden U-turn is just another unfortunate humiliation
for the country.
The Bush public relations team is trying to spin the new
agreement as a “breakthrough”. But there is no
breakthrough. Bush has capitulated on all the main
issues. It’s a terrible deal and that’s why so many
conservatives are enraged and spewing their anger in the
newspapers.
The agreement will remove the North from the State
Department’s list of terrorist states and provide 50,000
tons of fuel oil just for shutting down its Yongbyon
reactor. But that won’t address the north’s clandestine
nuclear program or Kim’s nuclear weapons stockpile. In
fact, these are not even on the table!
Just months ago Bush rejected the same deal saying, “We
will never agree to blackmail”.
My, how things change once a country gets nukes.
The present agreement is worse than the “Agreed
Framework” which was initiated by Bill Clinton in 1994
and which was universally repudiated by Republicans and
the conservative think tanks. Nicholas Eberstadt of the
far-right American Enterprise Institute summarized it
like this:
“This is substantially worse than the Agreed Framework…
The (original) agreement attempted to freeze everything
that we knew about the DPRK’s activities and probe their
good faith. Now, we have agreed to a deal that only
freezes part, at most, of North Korea’s nuclear
activities for a much higher price then the earlier
agreement, with a regime that we know operates in bad
faith on nuclear deals.”
Eberstadt is right. Every part of the agreement favors
the North. The United States and its allies will have to
provide 50,000 tons of fuel oil just for the privilege
of sitting down at the bargaining table with the DPRK
diplomats. Shutting down Yongbyon is utterly
meaningless; that doesn’t tell us where the secret
uranium enrichment program is located and that is the
fuel-source for the Kim’s nuclear weapons.
There’s no chance that the administration will persuade
the North to “denuclearize” (the administration’s word
du jour). Kim knows that the real objective of US policy
is regime change and that guarantees that he will never
give up his nukes. Instead, he plans to use the upcoming
negotiations as a means of extorting more concessions
from Bush and the allies. Next, he’s expected to demand
electrical power from South Korea, additional food and
medicine, and the light-water reactor which was promised
by Clinton. All the while, his nukes will remain safely
tucked away beyond reach; his only real bargaining chip.
The real danger in Bush’s policy-turnabout is the
message that it sends to Iran and any other country who
wants to improve its prospects vis a vis the United
States. If Iran had any doubts that it needs nuclear
weapons to fend off the US; those doubts have been
removed.
Bush’s blundering foreign policy has dealt a withering
blow to nuclear nonproliferation and paved the way for a
21st century arms race. This is a bad deal all around
and only underscores one basic truism:
Blackmail works.