United State of Minds
By Daniel M Pourkesali
03/15/07 "ICH
" -- - America 's methods of
mind control or better put, manufacturing consent through
efficient and careful use of media, must be the envy of
every tyrannical dictator ruling the most oppressive regimes
in the world.
Edward
Bernays [1], regarded by many as "father of public
relations" and as a member of the Committee on Public
Information (CPI or Creel Committee) who helped U.S.
President
Woodrow Wilson organize publicity on behalf of
U.S. objectives during World War I, once said "If we
understand the mechanism and motives of the group mind, it
is possible to control and regiment the masses according to
our will without their knowing it." He called this
scientific technique of opinion molding the "engineering
of consent".
Shaping of
one's attitude, beliefs, and personality without that
person's knowledge or consent works by gradually exerting
increasing control through a variety of techniques which
includes repetition and herding. The first one is relatively
easy to detect. For example, pick any news story about the
current Iranian president and you'll quickly note that he is
in most instances introduced as " Iran's hard-line president
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad"[2]. Has anyone ever heard of Mr. Bush
being described as America's 'preemptive strike' president?
Another
example is the emphasis on and blaming most acts of terror
around the world as being committed by "Islamic
Fundamentalists"[3] or "Islamic Radicals"[4]. As if Moslems
have secured legal patents on use of fundamentalism and
radicalism.
Control by
herding works by diverting attention of the target audience
or even honest news reporters from an event considered "
damaging", to a diversionary one that is considered less
damaging or even helpful. It is called control by herding
because those being controlled are not being forced to do
what they do. In fact, most don't even realize they're being
controlled at all and ridicule others who may happen to
recognize it, as conspiracy theorists. It is usually done by
creating a pre-arranged event to coincide with one that may
be perceived as damaging. The catastrophic ongoing Iraqi
fiasco is a perfect example. Of course there are times that
a pre-arranged event is not executed according to the plan,
as was with the botched case of presenting evidence [5] that
Iran was behind the killing of Americans in Iraq.
There has
been countless number of such staged events in the last six
years which many believe [6] began with the attacks
broadcasted live on billions of TV screens around the world
on 9/11/2001. That event alone conveniently served as the
emotional smokescreen allowing the Bush administration to
rush the pre-written, oxymoronic USA Patriot Act I [7]
through a visibly shaken Congress thus bypassing any debate
or close examination of that ghastly and constitutionally
challengeable legislation by any members of Congress or
their constituents—the American public. It also ushered in
the new era of "you're either with us or with the
terrorists" [8] paving the way for implementing again a
pre-written plan [9] for effective control of the world's
energy resources.
Since the collapse of Soviet
Union in 1991, absence of a real threat has been the
greatest fear of every U.S. government. The first Bush
regime desperately looked for a new enemy first portrayed as
Manuel Noriega, the Panamanian tyrant formerly on CIA
payroll, and then once ally Saddam Hussein as threats to
world peace. Today with the American warships positioned in
the Persian Gulf its Iran's Ahmadinejad and the no-good
mullahs. Meanwhile, an endless "war on terror" continues
against unnamed "terrorists" in Iraq and Afghanistan.
With an immense military
budget exceeding $600 billion, war appears to be the best
business for the big corporations and the thousands of
private defense contractors, but bad for a public that must
bear those hefty costs yet remained convinced and compliant
through the best methods of mind control money can buy.
[1]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Bernays
[2]
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14595681/
[3]
http://islamic-fundamentalism.info/
[4]
http://www.washtimes.com/national/20051007-120157-2959r.htm
[5]
http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=36547
[6]
http://www.wanttoknow.info/050908insidejob911
[7]
http://www.epic.org/privacy/terrorism/hr3162.html
[8]
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/09/20010920-8.html