|
Sanctioning the next war of aggression By
Daniel M Pourkesali
03/26/07 "ICH
" -- -- United Nations Security Council (UNSC)
has once again voted to impose yet another sanction on Iran for
its failure to suspend a legal activity allowed by the Nuclear
Non-proliferation Treaty [1], to which Iran remains a signatory
state, and that the IAEA itself has found no indication of any
nuclear material being diverted to military purposes.
As in case of the UNSC resolution 1737 [2] approved in
December 2006, the United States has played a key roll in draft
of the language used and the push for its passage, in a
continued effort to lay the ground for a planned military action
against Iran.
In an op-ed [3] written days following the ratification of
resolution 1737, this writer urged readers and all those
outraged by the Iraqi deception to stand up and repeatedly make
it known, over the deafening megaphones of the war-mongers that:
1) Iran is not in breach of any international conventions or
agreements. Processing of uranium is entirely within the
guidelines of the NPT, and according to the IAEA, all fissile
material have been accounted for and confirmed as not diverted
to prohibited activities.
Above remains true today as it has been since the inception
of Iranian nuclear program in 1957 with the help of the United
States. In that year a civil nuclear cooperation program was
established under the U.S. 'Atoms for Peace' program [4]. In
1959, the Tehran Nuclear Research Center (TNRC) was established
and run by the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (AEOI). The
TNRC was equipped with a U.S.-supplied 5-megawatt nuclear
research reactor that became operational in 1967 fuelled with
highly enriched uranium. Iran signed the NPT in 1968
and ratified it in 1970. With the establishment of Iran's atomic
agency and the NPT in place, the Shah approved plans to
construct, again with U.S. help, up to 23 nuclear power stations
by the year 2000.
2) The UN Security Council is not the world and hence does
not reflect the will of the 'international community' – it
represents the views and positions of 15 nations five of which
are undemocratically assigned as permanent members including the
United States, Britain, China, France and Russia.
The 118 United Nations member states of the Nonaligned
Movement [5] have repeatedly confirmed and recognized Iran's
right to nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. Yet a handful of
powerful nations led by the U.S., continue to portray their own
narrow and self-serving objectives as the will of the entire
international community.
3) Any military action against Iran regardless of the
Security Council approval would be ethically and morally void of
any legitimacy.
The UNSC is the organ of the United Nations charged with
maintaining peace and security among nations. Under Chapter Six
of the UN Charter [6], "Pacific Settlement of Disputes", the
Security Council "may investigate any dispute or any situation
which might lead to international friction or give rise to a
dispute in order to determine whether the continuance of the
dispute or situation is likely to endanger the maintenance of
international peace and security."
The key phrase is endangering of 'international peace and
security'. A simple question to ask here is this -- How can a
legal activity allowed by the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty
constitute a danger to world "peace and security" and prompt an
international body charged with maintaining the same to impose
such unwarranted sanctions that as witnessed in case of Iraq can
be used as plain justification to invade and occupy a sovereign
nation?
But the far grimmer question to ask is – Are we as world
citizens going to idly stand by and allow yet another illegal
act of treachery be carried out under the pretext of protecting
'international peace and security'?
[1]
http://www.fas.org/nuke/control/npt/text/npt2.htm
[2]
http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2006/sc8928.doc.htm \
[3]
http://www.campaigniran.org/casmii/index.php?q=node/954
[4]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atoms_for_Peace
[5]
http://www.nam.gov.za/background/members.htm
Daniel M
Pourkesali
http://www.campaigniran.org/casmii/
Click here
to comment on this and other articles
Send Page To a Friend
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)
|