|
Why there was no exit plan
By Lewis Seiler, Dan Hamburg
| There are people in Washington ... who never
intend to withdraw military forces from Iraq and
they're looking for 10, 20, 50 years in the future
... the reason that we went into Iraq was to
establish a permanent military base in the Gulf
region, and I have never heard any of our leaders
say that they would commit themselves to the Iraqi
people that 10 years from now there will be no
military bases of the United States in Iraq.
-- former President Jimmy Carter, Feb. 3, 2006
|
04/30/07 "SFGate"
-- -- - For all the talk about timetables and benchmarks,
one might think that the United States will end the military
occupation of Iraq within the lifetimes of the readers of this
opinion editorial. Think again.
There is to be no withdrawal from Iraq, just as there has been
no withdrawal from hundreds of places around the world that are
outposts of the American empire. As UC San Diego professor
emeritus Chalmers Johnson put it, "One of the reasons we had no
exit plan from Iraq is that we didn't intend to leave."
The United States maintains 737 military bases in 130 countries
across the globe. They exist for the purpose of defending the
economic interests of the United States, what is euphemistically
called "national security." In order to secure favorable access
to Iraq's vast reserves of light crude, the United States is
spending billions on the construction of at least five large
permanent military bases throughout that country.
A new Iraq oil law, largely written by the Coalition Provisional
Authority, is planned for ratification by June. This law cedes
control of Iraq's oil to western powers for 30 years . There is
major opposition to the proposed law within Iraq, especially
among the country's five trade union federations that represent
hundreds of thousands of oil workers. The United States is
working hard to surmount this opposition by appealing directly
to the al-Maliki government in Iraq.
The attack upon, and subsequent occupation of, Iraq can be seen
as a direct result of the 2001 National Energy Policy
Development Group (better known as vice president Cheney's
energy task force) that was comprised largely of oil and energy
company executives. This task force -- the proceedings of which
have been kept secret by the administration on the grounds of
"executive privilege" -- recommended that the U.S. government
support initiatives in Middle Eastern countries "to open up
areas of their energy sector to foreign investment." As Antonio
Juhasz, an analyst with Oil Change International wrote last
month in the New York Times, "One invasion and a great deal of
political engineering by the Bush administration later, this is
exactly what the proposed Iraq oil law would achieve."
The people of the United States have indicated, in the national
election last November and in countless polls, that they no
longer support the Bush administration's war. The Scooter Libby
trial revealed that top administration officials, including the
vice president, "cherry-picked" and distorted intelligence in
order to sell a "pre-emptive" war to a spooked public. The
squandering of hundreds of billions of dollars, some billions of
which, according to Seymour Hersh writing in the New Yorker, is
being siphoned into "black-ops" programs being run out of
Cheney's office (a stunning redux of Iran-Contra carried out by
many of the same actors), has also strained the patience and
credulity of the American people.
Another betrayal is the "contracting out" of "war-related
activities" to corporations such as Halliburton, Bechtel,
Chemonics and Blackwater. Halliburton, Vice President Cheney's
previous employer, calls itself an "energy services company" but
has tentacles reaching into nearly every aspect of the war
(originally dubbed Operation Iraqi Liberation until some bright
bulb among the Bushies realized that "OIL" might not be the best
handle for this venture). Halliburton has also profited
handsomely from no-bid government contracts awarded in the wake
of Hurricane Katrina, the construction at the national
embarrassment known as "Gitmo," and most recently, from the
fiasco at Walter Reed Army Hospital in Washington, D.C.
Unfortunately, all this corruption, mayhem and death are good
for some (or it wouldn't go on).
The U.S. military budget, larger than the military budgets of
the rest of the world's nations combined, continues skyward,
even without all the "supplementals" passed regularly by
Congress to fight the "war on terror."
The question we must ask as citizens is this: Is the United
States a democratic republic or an empire? History demonstrates
that it's not possible to be both.
Lewis Seiler is president of Voice of the Environment. Dan
Hamburg, a former U.S. representative, is executive director.
Copyright San Francisco Chronicle
Click here
to comment on this and other articles
Send Page To a Friend
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)
|