|
EU/US Merger: New Global Order
By Stealth
Few notice huge shift towards globalization as frothing masses
distracted by climate change debate
By Steve Watson
05/06/07 "Infowars"
-- - In a sweeping move that has garnered surprisingly
little attention this week the United States and the European
Union have signed up to a new transatlantic economic partnership
that will see regulatory standards "harmonized" and will lay the
basis for a merging of the US and EU into one single market, a
huge step on the path to a new globalized world order.
The BBC reported from the Summit in Washington on Monday:
"economic council" to push ahead with
regulatory convergence in nearly 40 areas,
including intellectual property, financial
services, business takeovers and the motor
industry.
Skipping over what the fall out
from a single Western market will be, the BBC
simply announced "The aim is to increase trade
and lower costs." before moving swiftly on to
analyse what this means in terms of global
warming.
While the masses are being
whipped up into a never ending frenzy over
climate change at every given opportunity,
hardcore political actions that will affect the
lives of everyone on the planet in the here and
now are being skated over with little or no
attention being paid to them.
The proponents and architects of
a one world order have worked long and hard
behind the scenes for a long time pushing a
gradual erosion of national sovereignty via a
harmonization of all areas of life, economic,
social, cultural and environmental.
Such harmonization and
elimination of diversity is the only way to
maximize the profit of the few at the expense of
the many, while maintaining tight controls over
society as a whole in order for a long
continuation of that status quo.
The global corporate elite are
the only ones who will benefit from essentially
wiping out the free market and eliminating
economic competition across nations.
The EU has long been used as a
tool for such harmonizing globalization and has
now reached the point at which it has become a
supranational federal government for Europe.
Over the years, what was originally sold as a
simple free trade treaty has slowly been built
from the bottom up into an all encompassing
monolithic authority over the entire region.
The areas it now seeks to
dominate also include public health, social
policy, transport, justice, agriculture,
fisheries, energy, economic and social cohesion,
the environment, internal and external trade,
and consumer protection.
It has recently been highlighted
that European globalists such as Britain's Tony
Blair and Germany's Angela Merkel are seeking to
implement by stealth areas of the EU
constitution regardless of its blanket rejection
by voters.
Senior British Cabinet sources have warned
that they are also pushing hard for Brussels to
be given a full-time unelected president, who
would serve a five year term and speak as the
voice of Europe on the world stage.
It is commonly accepted that
reforms to strengthen the European Parliament,
scheduled to be implemented before 2009,
could undermine the ability of member states to
opt out of EU laws, as Britain does at present,
effectively ending national sovereignty.
In their important history of
the
EU, The Great Deception, British authors
Christopher Booker and Richard North, concluded
that the 27 member nations now entangled in the
union have ceded their sovereignty in a
carefully planned stealth operation. They
grudgingly credit european globalists with
accomplishing "a slow-motion coup d’etat: the
most spectacular coup d’etat in history."
The authors of The Great Deception summarized
the effect of the Treaty of Rome: "Thus did the
central deception of the whole story become
established. From now on, the real agenda,
political integration, was to be deliberately
concealed under the guise of economic
integration. Building Europe was to be presented
as a matter of trade and jobs."
In addition dissidents and outcasts such as
Vladimir Bukovksy have warned that an elite
plan has long existed whereby the EU would be
hijacked and transformed into a Soviet style
Socialist superstate that would eliminate the
individual nation state's power and create a
governing body with no accountability or direct
representation.
In 2003 the BBC uncovered incredible archived
documents which confirmed that both the EU and
its single currency, the Euro, were the
brainchild of the secretive
Bilderberg Group. Some 50 years BEFORE the
implementation of the European single currency,
Bilderberg, now infamous as the secret elite
hand behind world events, had drawn up the
plans.
In addition to the EU,
an agenda for a North American Union is now
beyond doubt and is well on course according to
the internal policy documents of its unelected
legislators, the Council on Foreign Relations.
The CFR's North American Union mirrors
Bilderberg's European Union. In the CFR's
document,
Building a North American Community, mention
is given to the Bilderberg group in a
recommendation that private bodies be formed to
direct policy between Canada, Mexico, and the
United States. The document states:
"To ensure a regular injection of
creative energy into the various efforts
related to North American integration, the
three governments should appoint an
independent body of advisers. This body
should be composed of eminent persons from
outside government, appointed to staggered
multiyear terms to ensure their
independence. Their mandate would be to
engage in creative exploration of new ideas
from a North American perspective and to
provide a public voice for North America. A
complementary approach would be to establish
private bodies that would meet regularly or
annually to buttress North American
relationships, along the lines of the
Bilderberg..."
Very much like the EU, provisions for a NAU such
as NAFTA and GATT were sold at their inception
as free trade agreements. As time has progressed
we have witnessed the birth of the " Security
and Prosperity Partnership", a treaty, which
seems to be a little more than a simple economic
agreement, between leaders of the US, Mexico and
Canada that has been agreed without
Congressional oversight. A
Canadian report has described the SPP as "an
international framework for trilateral and
bilateral cooperation in North America" that is
"not a formal international treaty" or "an
overarching binding legal agreement." But what
is an "international framework" that commits
U.S. officials from various federal agencies to
working with officials of two other countries?
Why is such a process not subjected to
congressional scrutiny and approval?
Last September we reported that Journalist
Jerome Corsi had received the first documents
pertaining to a FOIA request asking for full
disclosure of the SPP office in its activities
towards creating a
Pan American Union.
The documents show that a wide range of US
administrative law is being re-written in
stealth under this program to "integrate" and
"harmonize" with administrative law in Mexico
and Canada, just as has become commonplace
within the EU.
The documents contain references to upwards
of 13 working groups within an entire organized
infrastructure that has drawn from officials
within most areas of administrative government
including U.S. departments of State, Homeland
Security, Commerce, Treasury, Agriculture,
Transportation, Energy, Health and Human
Services, and the office of the U.S. Trade
Representative.
Corsi
also reported that at a recent high-level
confab in Banff, an assistant U.S. secretary of
state, Thomas A. Shannon , chaired a panel that
featured a presentation by Prof. Robert Pastor,
author of a book promoting the development of a
North American union as a regional government
and the adoption of the amero as a common
monetary currency to replace the dollar and the
peso.
Just a conspiracy theory? Not according to
Steve Previs of Jefferies International who
stated on CNBC, "I think one thing for people
who are dollar based need to focus on is the
Amero, that's the one thing that nobody is
talking about that I think is going to have a
big impact... on everybody's life in Canada, the
U.S. and Mexico..."
A global crash, predicted by former
World Bank chief economist and nobel prize winner
Joseph Stiglitz, and a totally devalued dollar that
can barely rival the peso are greasing the skids for a
single North American currency. This spells disaster for
all Americans who wish to maintain their standard of
living and not find themselves barefoot on the street in
a bread queue.
The decline of the economy in the US is
being caused by the very predatory globalist policies of
the IMF and World Bank that are still presented to us as
the solution for economic turmoil. These two globalist
vampires have drained the third world dry, and are now
focusing their attention on enslaving the developed
world.
The single currency and a 'new economic
order' is a major step on the road to global governance.
Europe already has its own strong single currency, while
the dollar's days seem to be numbered. When money is
being printed by a private corporation is it any
surprise to see a push for a merger with other
countries' currencies?
Talk has long been of a global currency
by 2018 if plans go accordingly. A 1988 famous cover of
The Economist emphasized this, depicting a phoenix
standing atop burning paper money symbolizing its rise
out of their destruction, with the words "Get ready for
a world currency" next to it.
The article carried in The
Economist, titled "Get Ready for the Phoenix,"
stated that, "THIRTY years from now, Americans,
Japanese, Europeans, and people in many other rich
countries, and some relatively poor ones will
probably be paying for their shopping with the same
currency."
The article went on to state that
sovereignty will be lost with the advent of the new
currency, but that trends towards globalization are
already doing away with it anyway.
"The phoenix zone would impose tight
constraints on national governments. There
would be no such thing, for instance, as a
national monetary policy. The world phoenix
supply would be fixed by a new central bank,
descended perhaps from the IMF. The world
inflation rate - and hence, within narrow
margins, each national inflation rate- would
be in its charge. Each country could use
taxes and public spending to offset
temporary falls in demand, but it would have
to borrow rather than print money to finance
its budget deficit. With no recourse to the
inflation tax, governments and their
creditors would be forced to judge their
borrowing and lending plans more carefully
than they do today. This means a big loss of
economic sovereignty, but the trends that
make the phoenix so appealing are taking
that sovereignty away in any case. Even in a
world of more-or-less floating exchange
rates, individual governments have seen
their policy independence checked by an
unfriendly outside world."
"Pencil in the phoenix for around
2018, and welcome it when it comes," the article
concludes.
In 2004 Robert Mundell, the
Nobel-prize winning economist often credited with
paving the way to the European single currency,
called for a global currency.
In an interview with French paper
Libération, Mundell said: "With the emergence of the
euro and its instability against the dollar, Europe,
the United States and the Asian powers should come
together and create a new international monetary
system."
In 2006 the scandal-ridden and
highly secretive Bank For International Settlements,
considered to be the world's top central banking
policy, released a policy paper that
called for the end of national currencies in
favor of a global model of currency formats.
The BIS is a branch of the of the
Bretton-Woods International Financial architecture
and closely allied with the Bilderberg Group. It is
controlled by an inner elite that represents all the
world's major central banking institutions. John
Maynard Keynes, perhaps the most influential
economist of all time, wanted it closed down as it
was used to launder money for the Nazis in World War
II.
It appears we are now seeing the
slow realization of a gloabal economic system with a
single currency.
The end game of such regionalizing
harmonization is of course a global government.
It has long been recognized that an
instant world government would be roundly rejected
by the masses and that a stepping stone agenda, a
stealth implementation of a new global order is the
key to its success.
Writing in the April 1974 issue of
Foreign Affairs, the flagship publication of the
Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Richard N.
Gardner , who has held a number of State Department
posts, argued against what he called "instant world
government." Instead, he wrote, "the 'house of world
order' will have to be built from the bottom up
rather than from the top down. It will look like a
great 'booming, buzzing confusion,' to use William
James' famous description of reality, but an end run
around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by
piece, will accomplish much more than the
old-fashioned frontal assault."
In a similar sentiment, former
National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski
pointed to "regionalization" as the key for
"globalization" in his address to Gorbechev's State
of the World Forum in October 1995: "The
precondition for eventual globalization — genuine
globalization — is progressive regionalization,
because thereby we move toward larger, more stable,
more cooperative units."
This week we have witnessed the
first steps towards the biggest "cooperative unit"
there has ever been with the groundwork being set
for a EU-US single market. However, as the CFR would
say, amidst the "booming, buzzing confusion" few
have noticed.
Daniel Taylor of
Old-thinker news contributed research to this
report.
Click here
to comment on this and other articles
Send Page To a Friend
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)
|