|
U.S. paid nearly $31 million
in condolence payments to Iraqis, Afghanis
By Nancy A. Youssef
McClatchy Newspapers
06/01/07 "McClatchy"
--- -- WASHINGTON - The Department of Defense spent nearly
$31 million in three years in condolence payments to civilians
in Iraq and Afghanistan, but it didn't track how it doled out
the money, a Government Accountability Office report found.
The report, released Thursday, is the most detailed public study
of compensation payments in the two wars. It found, for example,
that the Defense Department paid $26 million to settle 21,450
claims, or an average of $1,212 per claim.
The military makes condolence payments for killing or injuring a
civilian or for damaging property. Generally, Iraqis and
Afghanis received up to $2,500 for property damage or death. In
April 2006, military officials in Iraq raised the maximum
payment to $10,000. In addition, U.S. officials began paying the
relatives of Iraqi soldiers and police who were killed because
of U.S. operations, the report states.
But the department doesn't indicate how many of those payments
went for killed civilians, injured civilians or for property
damage. U.S. officials have never released statistics on how
many civilians have been killed by U.S. troops.
According to the report, the U.S. began compensating Iraqi
civilians or their relatives in June 2003 for inadvertent
killings or property damage, usually at the discretion of the
forces on the ground. But the military didn't establish
guidelines for paying civilians until October 2004. U.S. forces
began compensating Afghanis in October 2005.
But those compensation reports aren't very detailed, a
Washington advocacy group found. In a separate report released
Thursday, the Campaign for Innocent Victims in Conflict found
that many reports contained only a sheet of paper with a
synopsis of what happened.
Sarah Holewinski, CIVIC executive director, said that none of
the reports the military has made public details the incidents
the way the GAO report recommended. "All we have seen are
bulk-line items. And that kind of generality does not lead to
accountability," Holewinski said.
The amount of condolence payments in Iraq dropped by two-thirds
between 2005 and 2006. During that time, U.S. officials said
that Iraqi civilians were being killed because they couldn't
identify U.S. checkpoints. The U.S. subsequently made
checkpoints more easily identifiable, and the military said the
number of civilian casualties declined.
U.S. officials also paid for scores of homes that were damaged
during the November 2004 offensive in Fallujah.
From October 2004 to September 2005, the Defense Department gave
Iraqis $21,528,664 in condolence payments, compared with
$7,311,911 the following year. In Afghanistan, the military paid
$210,758 from October 2005 to September 2006.
In its recommendations, the authors of the report said the
Defense Department should better differentiate payments for
civilians injured or killed and those whose properties were
damaged.
But Holewinski said that even if the military met those
recommendations, that wouldn't explain how civilians were killed
and why.
Click on
"comments" below to read or post
comments
|
|
Send Page To a Friend
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)
|
Comment Guidelines
Be succinct, constructive and relevant to the story. We encourage engaging, diverse and meaningful commentary. Do not include personal information such as names, addresses, phone numbers and emails. Comments falling outside our guidelines – those including personal attacks and profanity – are not permitted.
See our complete Comment Policy and use this link to notify us if you have concerns about a comment. We’ll promptly review and remove any inappropriate postings.