CLICK
PLAY TO LISTEN
Listen to
Segment || Download
Show mp3
Watch 128k stream
Watch 256k stream
Click on
"comments" below to read or post
comments
TRANSCRIPT
AMY GOODMAN: Hundreds of thousands of
protesters are gathering in Germany ahead of tomorrow’s G8
meeting of the world’s richest nations. The three-day summit
is being held in the coastal resort of Heiligendamm. German
police have spent $18 million to erect an eight-mile-long,
two-meter-high fence around the meeting site.
Global warming will be high on the agenda.
Going into the meeting, President Bush has proposed to
sideline the UN-backed Kyoto Accords and set voluntary
targets on reducing emissions of greenhouse gas. Other top
issues will include foreign aid and new trade deals.
Today, we spend the hour with a man who
claims to have worked deep inside the forces driving
corporate globalization. In his first book, Confessions
of an Economic Hit Man, John Perkins told the story of
his work as a highly paid consultant hired to strong-arm
leaders into creating policy favorable to the US government
and corporations, what he calls the “corporatocracy.” John
Perkins says he helped the US cheat poor countries around
the globe out of trillions of dollars by lending them more
money than they could possibly repay and then taking over
their economies. John Perkins has just come out with his
second book on this issue. It’s called The Secret History
of the American Empire: Economic Hit Men, Jackals and the
Truth about Global Corruption. John Perkins joins us now
in the firehouse studio. Welcome to Democracy Now!
JOHN PERKINS: Thank you, Amy. It’s
great to be here.
AMY GOODMAN: Well, before we go
further, “economic hit men” -- for those who haven’t heard
you describe this, let alone describe yourself as this, what
do you mean?
JOHN PERKINS: Well, really, I think
it’s fair to say that since World War II, we economic hit
men have managed to create the world's first truly global
empire, and we've done it primarily without the military,
unlike other empires in history. We've done it through
economics very subtly.
We work many different ways, but perhaps the
most common one is that we will identify a third world
country that has resources our corporations covet, such as
oil, and then we arrange a huge loan to that country from
the World Bank or one of its sister organizations. The money
never actually goes to the country. It goes instead to US
corporations, who build big infrastructure projects -- power
grids, industrial parks, harbors, highways -- things that
benefit a few very rich people but do not reach the poor at
all. The poor aren’t connected to the power grids. They
don’t have the skills to get jobs in industrial parks. But
they and the whole country are left holding this huge debt,
and it’s such a big bet that the country can't possibly
repay it. So at some point in time, we economic hit men go
back to the country and say, “Look, you know, you owe us a
lot of money. You can't pay your debt, so you’ve got to give
us a pound of flesh.”
AMY GOODMAN: And explain your
history. What made you an economic hit man?
JOHN PERKINS: Well, when I graduated
from business school at Boston University, I was recruited
by the National Security Agency, the nation’s largest and
perhaps most secretive spy organization.
AMY GOODMAN: People sometimes think
the CIA is that, but the NSA, many times larger.
JOHN PERKINS: Yeah, it is larger.
It’s much larger. At least it was in those days. And it’s
very, very secretive. We all -- there’s a lot of rumors. We
know quite a lot about the CIA, I think, but we know very,
very little about the NSA. It claims to only work in a
cryptography, you know, encoding and decoding messages, but
in fact we all know that they’re the people who have been
listening in on our telephone conversations. That’s come out
recently. And they’re a very, very secretive organization.
They put me through a series of tests, very
extensive tests, lie detector tests, psychological tests,
during my last year in college. And I think it’s fair to say
that they identified me as a good potential economic hit
man. They also identified a number of weaknesses in my
character that would make it relatively easy for them to
hook me, to bring me in. And I think those weaknesses, I
[inaudible] might call, the three big drugs of our culture:
money, power and sex. Who amongst us doesn’t have one of
them? I had all three at the time.
And then I joined the Peace Corps. I was
encouraged to do that by the National Security Agency. I
spent three years in Ecuador living with indigenous people
in the Amazon and the Andes, people who today and at that
time were beginning to fight the oil companies. In fact, the
largest environmental lawsuit in the history of the world
has just been brought by these people against Texaco,
Chevron. And that was incredibly good training for what I
was to do.
And then, while I was still in the Peace
Corps, I was brought in and recruited into a US private
corporation called Charles T. Main, a consulting firm out of
Boston of about 2,000 employees, very low-profile firm that
did a tremendous amount of work of what I came to understand
was the work of economic hit men, as I described it earlier,
and that’s the role I began to fulfill and eventually kind
of rose to the top of that organization as its chief
economist.
AMY GOODMAN: And how did that tie to
the NSA? Was there a connection?
JOHN PERKINS: You know, that’s what’s
very interesting about this whole system, Amy, is that
there’s no direct connection. The NSA had interviewed me,
identified me and then essentially turned me over to this
private corporation. It’s a very subtle and very smart
system, whereby it’s the private industry that goes out and
does this work. So if we’re caught doing something, if we’re
caught bribing or corrupting local officials in some
country, it’s blamed on private industry, not on the US
government.
And it’s interesting that in the few
instances when economic hit men fail, what we call “the
Jackals,” who are people who come in to overthrow
governments or assassinate their leaders, also come out of
private industry. These are not CIA employees. We all have
this image of the 007, the government agent hired to kill,
you know, with license to kill, but these days the
government agents, in my experience, don't do that. It’s
done by private consultants that are brought in to do this
work. And I’ve known a number of these individuals
personally and still do.
AMY GOODMAN: In your book, The
Secret History of the American Empire, you talk about
taking on global power at every level. Right now, we’re
seeing these mass protests taking place in Germany ahead of
the G8 meeting. Talk about the significance of these.
JOHN PERKINS: Well, I think it’s
extremely significant. Something is happening in the world
today, which is very, very important. Yeah, as we watched
the headlines this morning, you know, what we can absolutely
say is we live in a very dangerous world. It’s also a very
small world, where we’re able to immediately know what’s
going on in Germany or in the middle of the Amazon or
anywhere else. And we’re beginning to finally understand
around the world, I think, that the only way my children or
grandchildren or any child or grandchild anywhere on this
planet is going to be able to have a peaceful, stable and
sustainable world is if every child has that. The G8 hasn’t
got that yet.
AMY GOODMAN: Explain what the Group
of Eight are.
JOHN PERKINS: Well, the Group of
Eight are the wealthiest countries in the world, and
basically they run the world. And the leader is the United
States, and it’s actually the corporations within these
companies -- countries, excuse me -- that run it. It’s not
the governments, because, after all, the governments serve
at the pleasure of the corporations. In our own country, we
know that the next two final presidential candidates,
Republican and Democrat alike, are going to each have to
raise something like half a billion dollars. And that’s not
going to come from me and you. Primarily that’s going to
come from the people who own and run our big corporations.
They’re totally beholden to the government. So the G8 really
is this group of countries that represent the biggest
multinational corporations in the world and really serve at
their behest.
And what we’re seeing now in Europe -- and
we’re seeing it very strongly in Latin America, we’re seeing
it in the Middle East -- we’re seeing this huge undercurrent
of resistance, of protest, against this empire that’s been
built out of this. And it’s been such a subtle empire that
people haven’t been aware of it, because it wasn’t built by
the military. It was built by economic hit men. Most of us
aren’t aware of it. Most Americans have no idea that these
incredible lifestyles that we all lead are because we’re
part of a very vicious empire that literally enslaves people
around the world, misuses people. But we’re beginning to
understand this. And the Europeans and the Latin Americans
are at the forefront of this understanding.
AMY GOODMAN: Well, we’re going to
talk to you about Congo, about Lebanon, about the Middle
East, about Latin America, much of what you cover in The
Secret History of the American Empire, when we come
back.
[break]
AMY GOODMAN: Our guest is John
Perkins. From 1971 to ’81, he worked for the international
consulting firm of Charles T. Main, where he was a
self-described “economic hit man.” His new book is called
The Secret History of the American Empire: Economic Hit Men,
Jackals and the Truth about Global Corruption. Let's
talk back, going to Latin America, about this ChevronTexaco
lawsuit.
JOHN PERKINS: Well, that’s extremely
significant. When I was sent to Ecuador as a Peace Corps
volunteer in 1968, Texaco had just gone into Ecuador, and
the promise to the Ecuadorian people at that time from
Texaco and their own politicians and the World Bank was oil
is going to pull this country out of poverty. And people
believed it. I believed it at the time. The exact opposite
has happened. Oil has made the country much more
impoverished, while Texaco has made fortunes off this. It’s
also destroyed vast areas of the Amazon rainforest.
So the lawsuit today that’s being brought by
a New York lawyer and some Ecuadorian lawyers -- Steve
Donziger here in New York -- is for $6 billion, the largest
environmental lawsuit in the history of the world, in the
name of 30,000 Ecuadorian people against Texaco, which is
now owned by Chevron, for dumping over eighteen billion
gallons of toxic waste into the Ecuadorian rainforest.
That’s thirty times more than the Exxon Valdez. And dozens
and dozens of people have died and are continuing to die of
cancer and other pollution-related diseases in this area of
the Amazon. So all this oil has come out of this area, and
it’s the poorest area of one of the poorest countries in the
hemisphere. And the irony of that is just so amazing.
But what I think -- one of the really
significant things about this, Amy, is that this law firm
has taken this on, not pro bono, but they expect if
they win the case, which they expect to do, to make a lot of
money off of it, which is a philosophical decision. It isn’t
because they wanted to get rich off this. It’s because they
want to encourage other law firms to do similar things in
Nigeria and in Indonesia and in Bolivia, in Venezuela and
many other places. So they want to see a business grow out
of this, of law firms going in and defending poor people,
knowing that they can get a payoff from the big companies
who have acted so terribly, terribly, terribly irresponsibly
in the past.
And Steve Donziger, the attorney -- I was in
Ecuador with him just two weeks ago -- and one of the very
touching things he said is -- he’s an American attorney
with, you know, very good credentials, and he says, “You
know, I’ve seen a lot of companies make mistakes and then
try to defend themselves in law courts.” And he said,
“That’s one thing. But in this case, Texaco didn’t make
mistakes. This was done with intent. They knew what they
were doing. To save a few bucks, they killed a lot of
people.” And now they’re going to be forced to pay for that,
to take responsibility for that, and hopefully open the door
to make many companies take responsibility for the wanton
destruction that’s occurred.
AMY GOODMAN: Let's talk about Latin
America and its leaders, like Jaime Roldos. Talk about him
and his significance. You wrote about him in your first
book, Confessions of an Economic Hit Man.
JOHN PERKINS: Yeah, Jaime Roldos was
an amazing man. After many years of military dictators in
Ecuador, US puppet dictators, there was a democratic
election, and one man, Jaime Roldos, ran on a platform that
said Ecuadorian resources ought to be used to help the
Ecuadorian people, and specifically oil, which at that time
was just coming in. This was in the late ’70s. And I was
sent to Ecuador, and I was also sent at the same time to
Panama to work with Omar Torrijos, to bring these men
around, to corrupt them, basically, to change their minds.
You know, in the case of Jaime Roldos, he
won the election by a landslide, and now he started to put
into action his policy, his promises, and was going to tax
the oil companies. If they weren’t willing to give much more
of their profits back to the Ecuadorian people, then he
threatened to nationalize them. So I was sent down, along
with other economic hit men -- I played a fairly minor role
in that case and a major one in Panama with Torrijos -- but
we were sent into these countries to get these men to change
their policies, to go against their own campaign promises.
And basically what you do is you tell them, “Look, you know,
if you play our game, I can make you and your family very
healthy. I can make sure that you get very rich. If you
don’t play our game, if you follow your campaign promises,
you may go the way of Allende in Chile or Arbenz in
Guatemala or Lumumba in the Congo.” On and on, we can list
all these presidents that we’ve either overthrown or
assassinated because they didn’t play our game. But Jaime
would not come around, Jaime Roldos. He stayed
uncorruptible, as did Omar Torrijos.
And both of these -- and from an economic
hit man perspective, this was very disturbing, because not
only did I know I was likely to fail at my job, but I knew
that if I failed, something dire was going to happen: the
Jackals would come in, and they would either overthrow these
men or assassinate them. And in both cases, these men were
assassinated, I have no doubt. They died in airplane crashes
two months apart from each other in 1981 -- single plane;
their own private planes crashed.
AMY GOODMAN: Explain more what
happened with Omar Torrijos.
JOHN PERKINS: Well, Omar, again, was
very stalwartly standing up to the United States, demanding
that the Panama Canal should be owned by Panamanians. And I
spent a lot of time with Torrijos, and I liked him very,
very much as an individual. He was extremely charismatic,
extremely courageous and very nationalistic about wanting to
get the best for his people. And I couldn’t corrupt him. I
tried everything I could possibly do to bring him around.
And as I was failing, I was also very concerned that
something would happen to him. And sure enough -- it was
interesting that Jaime Roldos's plane crashed in May, and
Torrijos said -- got his family together and said, “I’m
probably next, but I’m ready to go. We’ve now got the Canal
turned over.” He had signed a treaty with Jimmy Carter to
get the Canal in Panamanian hands. He said, “I’ve
accomplished my job, and I’m ready to go now.” And he had a
dream about being in a plane that hit a mountain. And within
two months after it happened to Roldos, it happened to
Torrijos also.
AMY GOODMAN: And you met with both
these men?
JOHN PERKINS: Yes, I’d met with both
of them.
AMY GOODMAN: What were your
conversations like?
JOHN PERKINS: Well, especially with
Torrijos, I spent a lot of time with him in some formal
meetings and also at cocktail parties and barbecues -- he
was big on things like that -- and was constantly trying to
get him to come around to our side and letting him know that
if he did, he and his family would get some very lucrative
contracts, would become very wealthy, and, you know, warning
him. And he didn’t really need much warning, because he knew
what would be likely to happen if he didn’t. And his
attitude was, “I want to get done what I can in my lifetime,
and then so be it.”
And it’s been interesting, Amy, that since I
wrote the book Confessions, Marta Roldos, who’s
Jaime’s daughter, has come to the United States to meet with
me, and I just spent time with her in Ecuador. She is now a
member of parliament in Ecuador, just elected, and she
married Omar Torrijos's nephew. And it’s really interesting
to hear their stories about what was going on -- she was
seventeen at the time her parents -- her mother was also in
the plane that her father died in; the two of them died in
that plane -- and then to hear her talk about how her
husband, Omar's nephew, was in that meeting when the family
was called together and Omar said, “I’m probably next, but
I’m ready to go. I’ve done my job. I’ve done what I could do
for my people. So I’m ready to go, if that’s what has to
happen.”
AMY GOODMAN: So what were your
conversations at the time with other so-called economic hit
men? I mean, you became the chief consultant at Charles
Main.
JOHN PERKINS: Chief economist.
AMY GOODMAN: Chief economist.
JOHN PERKINS: Right. Well, you know,
when I was with other people that -- we could be sitting at
a table, say, in the Hotel Panama, knowing that we’re both
here to win these guys over, but we also had our official
jobs, which were to do studies on the economy, to show how
if the country accepted the loan, it was going to improve
its gross national product. We would talk about those kinds
of things. It’s, I suspect, a little bit like if two CIA
agents, spies, get together or have a beer together, they
don’t really talk about what they’re really doing beneath
the surface, but they’ve got an official job, too, and
that’s what you focus on. And, in fact, the two, in my case,
are very closely linked.
So we were producing these economic reports
that would prove to the World Bank and would prove to Omar
Torrijos that if he accepted these huge loans, then his
country's gross national product would just mushroom and
pull his people out of poverty. And we produced these
reports, which made sense from a mathematical econometric
standpoint. And, in fact, it often happened that with these
loans, the GNP, the gross national product, did increase.
But what also was true, and what Omar knew
and Jaime Roldos knew and I was coming to know very
strongly, was that even if the general economy increased,
the poor people with these loans would get poorer. The rich
would make all the money, because most of the poor people
weren’t even tied into the gross national product. A lot of
them didn’t even make income. They were living off
subsistence farming. They benefited nothing, but they were
left holding the debt, and because of these huge debts,
their country in the long term would not be able to provide
them with healthcare, education and other social services.
AMY GOODMAN: Talk about Congo.
JOHN PERKINS: Oh, boy. The whole
story of Africa and the Congo is such a devastating and sad
one. And it’s the hidden story, really. We in the United
States don’t even talk about Africa. We don’t think about
Africa. You know, Congo has something called coltan, which
probably most of your listeners may not have even heard of,
but every cell phone and laptop computer has coltan in it.
And several million people in the last few years in the
Congo have been killed over coltan, because you and I and
all of us in the G8 countries demand low -- or at least we
want to see our computers inexpensive and our cell phones
inexpensive. And, of course, the companies that make these
sell them on that basis, that “Oh, here, mine’s $200 less
than the other company.” But in order to do that, these
people in the Congo are being enslaved. The miners, the
people mining coltan, they’re being killed. There’s these
vast wars going on to provide us with cheap coltan.
And I have to say, you know, if we want to
live in a safe world, we need to be -- we must be willing,
and, in fact, we must demand that we pay higher prices for
things like laptop computers and cell phones and that a good
share of that money go back to the people who are mining the
coltan. And that’s true of oil. It’s true of so many
resources that we are not paying the true cost, and there’s
millions of people around the world suffering from that.
Roughly 50,000 people die every single day from hunger or
hunger-related diseases and curable diseases that they don’t
get the medicines for, simply because they’re part of a
system that demands that they put in long hours, and they
get very, very low pay, so we can have things cheaper in
this country. And the Congo is an incredibly potent example
of that.
To purchase an audio or video copy of this
entire program,
click here for online ordering or call 1 (888) 999-3877.
Send Page To a Friend
Comment Guidelines
Be succinct, constructive and relevant to the story. We encourage engaging, diverse and meaningful commentary. Do not include personal information such as names, addresses, phone numbers and emails. Comments falling outside our guidelines – those including personal attacks and profanity – are not permitted.
See our complete Comment Policy and use this link to notify us if you have concerns about a comment. We’ll promptly review and remove any inappropriate postings.