Explaining Michael Chertoff’s
counterterrorism stomach
Video and Transcript: Special Comment By Keith Olbermann
You have by now heard the remark — instantly added to our
through-the-looking-glass lexicon of the 21st century, a
time when we suddenly started referring to this country as
“the homeland,” as if anybody here has used that term since
Charles Lindbergh or the German-American Bund in 1940.
Michael Chertoff’s “gut feeling.”
Posted 07/14/07
Click
on "comments" below to
read or post comments
Comment
Guidelines
Be succinct, constructive and
relevant to the story.
We
encourage engaging, diverse and
meaningful commentary. Do not
include personal information such
as names, addresses, phone
numbers and emails. Comments
falling outside our guidelines
those including personal
attacks and profanity are
not permitted.
See our complete Comment
Policy and use
this link to notify us if you
have concerns about a comment.
Well promptly review and
remove any inappropriate
postings.
TRANSCRIPT
Olbermann: All hail the prophetic gut!
Explaining Michael Chertoff’s counterterrorism stomach
Video and Transcript: Special Comment By Keith Olbermann
Broadcast
07/12/07
You have by now heard the remark — instantly added to our
through-the-looking-glass lexicon of the 21st century, a time
when we suddenly started referring to this country as “the
homeland,” as if anybody here has used that term since Charles
Lindbergh or the German-American Bund in 1940.
Michael Chertoff’s “gut feeling.”
Which, he took pains to emphasize, was based on no specific nor
even vague intelligence that we are entering a period of
increased risk of terrorism here.
He got as specific as saying that al-Qaida seems to like the
summer, but as to the rest of it, he is perfectly content to let
us sit and wait and worry — and to contemplate his gut.
His gut!
We used to have John Ashcroft’s major announcements.
We used to have David Paulison’s breathless advisories about how
to use duct tape against radiation attacks.
We used to have Tom Ridge’s color-coded threat levels.
Now we have Michael Chertoff’s gut!
Once, we thought we were tiptoeing along a Grand Canyon of
possible and actual freedoms and civil liberties destroyed, as
part of some kind of nauseating but ultimately necessary and
intricately designed plan to stop future 9/11s or even future
Glasgow car bombers who wind up having to get out and push their
failed weapons.
Now it turns out we are risking all of our rights and
protections — and risking the anger and hatred of the rest of
the world — for the sake of Michael Chertoff’s gut.
I have pondered this supreme expression of diminished
expectations for parts of three days now. I have concluded that
there are only five possible explanations for Mr. Chertoff’s
remarkable revelations about his transcendently important
counterterrorism stomach.
Firstly, Mr. Chertoff, you are, as Richard Wolffe said here the
other night, actually referencing not your gut but your backside
— as in, “covering it.” CYA.
Not only has there not been a terrorist attack stopped in this
country, but your good old Homeland Security hasn’t even
unraveled a plausible terrorist plan.
And you and your folks there have a different kind of stomach
pain, knowing that with a track record that consists largely of
two accomplishments — inconveniencing people at airports and
scaring them everywhere else — your department doesn’t know what
the hell it’s doing, and even you, Mr. Chertoff, know it.
Secondly, of course, there is the explanation of choice for
those millions of us who have heard the shrill and curiously
timed cries of “wolf” over the past six years — what we’ve
called here “the Nexus of Politics and Terror” — that there
isn’t anything cooking, and your “gut feeling” was actually that
you’d better throw up a diversion soon on Mr. Bush’s behalf or
something real — like the Republicans’ revolt about Iraq, and
the nauseating “gut feeling” that we have gotten 3,611 Americans
killed there for no reason — was actually going to seep into the
American headlines and consciousness.
It’s impossible to prove a negative, to guarantee that you and
your predecessors deliberately scared the American public just
for the political hell of it — even though your predecessor, Mr.
Ridge, admitted he had his suspicions about exactly that.
Suffice to say, Mr. Chertoff: If it ever can be proved, there
will be a lot of people from Homeland Security and other
outposts of this remarkably corrupt administration who will be
going to prison.
Thirdly — and most charitably, I guess, Mr. Chertoff — is the
possibility that you have made some credible inference that we
are really at greater risk right now but that any detail might
blow some sort of attempt at interruption. There is some silver
lining in this one.
But the silver lining would have been a greater one if this
National Counter Terrorism Center Report hadn’t leaked out the
day after you introduced us to your gut, a report suggesting al-Qaida
had re-built its operational capacity to pre-9/11 levels.
Not only did this latest hair-on-fire missive remind us that al-Qaida’s
re-growth has been along the Pakistan/Afghanistan border; not
only did it remind us that your boss let this happen by shifting
his resources out of Afghanistan to Iraq for his own vain and
foolish purposes, to say nothing of ignoring Pakistan; not only
did it underscore the ominous truth that if this country is
victimized again by al-Qaida, the personal responsibility for
the failure of our misplaced defenses would belong to President
Bush and President Bush alone, but on top of all of it, Mr.
Chertoff, it revealed you for the phony expert you are — the kid
who hears in confidence something smart from somebody smart and
then makes his prediction that what the smart kid said
confidentially is about to happen.
It reads just as you revised the “gut” remark this morning, sir
— the “informed opinion.” The kid telling stories out of school.
The fourth possibility is a simple reversal of the third, Mr.
Chertoff.
You shot off your bazoo, and then this National Counter
Terrorism Center report was rushed out — even created — to cover
you, to give you credibility, to cloud the reality that you
actually intoned to the Chicago Tribune, the 21st-century
equivalent of “by the pricking of my thumb, something wicked
this way comes."
But the fifth possible explanation of your gut, Mr. Chertoff, is
the real nightmare scenario.
And it is simple.
That you, the man who famously told us “Louisiana is a city that
is largely under water,” meant this literally.
That we really have been reduced to listening to see if your gut
will growl.
That your intestines are our best defense.
That your bowels are our listening devices, your digestive tract
is full of augurs, your colon produces the results that the
torture at Gitmo does not.
All hail the prophetic gut!
So there are your choices: bureaucratic self-protection,
political manipulation of the worst kind, the dropping of opaque
hints, a gaffe backfilled by an “instant report,” or the
complete disintegration of our counterterror effort.
Even if there really is never another terror attempt in this
country, we have already lost too much in these last six years
to now have to listen to Michael Chertoff’s gut, no matter what
its motivation.
We cannot and will not turn this country into a police state.
But even those of us who say that most loudly and insistently
acknowledge that some stricter measures, under the
still-stricter supervision of as many watchdogs as we can
summon, are appropriate.
But you’re not even going to wring any of that from us, Mr.
Chertoff, if we’re going to hear remarks about your “gut
feelings.”
You have reduced yourself to the status of a hunch-driven clown,
and it’s probably time you turned your task over to somebody who
represents the brain and not the gut, certainly to somebody who
does not, as you do now, represent that other part of the
anatomy — the one through which the body disposes of what the
stomach doesn’t want.
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)