The
Pentagon’s latest Big Lie
By Mike Whitney
08/08/07 "ICH"
-- -- The quality of Pentagon-propaganda is really
deteriorating.
The War Dept.’s latest fraud appeared in this week’s
newspapers under the ominous-sounding headline:
“US Kills Mastermind of Iraq Shrine”
The article is similar to hundreds of other stories we’ve
seen in the passed few years boasting of the murder of an
“alleged” terrorist kingpin whose evil deeds have prevented
democracy from flourishing in Iraq.
Oh, please.
CNN: “Coalition troops killed the al Qaeda terrorist who
masterminded the February 2006 attack on Samarra's al-Askariya
mosque and set off continuing violence and reprisal killings
between Sunnis and Shiites, the U.S. military said Sunday.”
Snip “Haitham Sabah al-Baderi, the al Qaeda emir of greater
Samarra, was killed Thursday east of Samarra, said Rear Adm.
Mark Fox during a news conference”. snip "Eliminating al-Baderi
is another step in breaking the cycle of violence instigated
by the attack on the holy shrine in Samarra," Fox said. "We
will continue to hunt down the brutal terrorists who are
intent on creating a Taliban-like state in Iraq." (CNN)
In truth, CNN has no idea who al-Baderi really was or
whether he belonged to Al Qaida or not. They just jot down
whatever the Pentagon spokesman tells them and then pass it
off later as news. It’s the same with the rest of the media.
They don’t care. They build their stories on statements from
government officials and don’t bother looking for evidence.
All they know is that al-Baderi is another unlucky victim in
Bush’s war on terror who has been subsumed into the
Pentagon’s propaganda war against the American people.
That’s it.
So why bother publishing a crazy story like this? It doesn’t
change public opinion on the war or convince people that al
Qaida is the main enemy in Iraq. So what good is it? It's
just an attempt to show progress in a losing cause by
holding up another enemy scalp.
But, that’s not public relations--- it’s barbarism. Don’t
the Pentagon big-wigs know that? They think the American
people relish the idea of assassinating enemy “suspects”
without any proof of wrongdoing or judicial oversight. But
they’re wrong. People are sickened by it. Can’t they see
that?
What is gained by fabricating another goofy story before the
dust has even settled on the Tillman fiasco? Why not let the
public fully-digest the last “Big Lie” before moving on to
the next one?
Remember Tillman---the outspoken NFL star who figured out
the war was a fake and started blasting the Bush
administration’s lies?
Well, he took three bullets to the head---“gangland
style”---in what the Pentagon dubbed “friendly fire”.
What a joke. Is the Pentagon trying to destroy what little
credibility it has left?
Apparently.
THIS WEEK’S BIG LIE
I’ve done a lot of research on both bombings of the Golden
Dome Mosque and I can tell you that THE MILITARY HAS NEVER
CONDUCTED AN INVESTIGATION OF WHAT REALLY HAPPENED. Never.
That means the CNN headline is just more empty blather. The
few eyewitness accounts that appeared in Iraqi blogs and web
sites strongly suggest that US Intelligence agencies and
Iraqi troops from the Interior Ministry may have been
involved. The theories connecting Al Qaida to the incident
are pure speculation with no factual basis.
And yet, here’s what Bush said in a speech just days after
the first bombing:
“Al Qaida terrorists and Sunni insurgents… blew up one of
the holiest shrines in Shia Islam—the Golden Mosque of
Samarra—in a calculated effort to provoke Iraq’s Shia
population to retaliate. Their strategy worked. Radical Shia
elements; some supported by Iran, formed death squads. And
the result was a vicious cycle of sectarian violence that
continues today.”
How does Bush know who it was? He never ordered an
investigation and he doesn’t have a crystal ball. If there’s
proof---show us! Otherwise we should assume that he is just
trying to blame someone else for his part in turning Iraq
into a charnel house.
Those aren’t Al Qaida’s B-1 Bombers dropping cluster bombs
and Daisy Cutters on Iraqi cities. And, that isn’t al-Baderi
kicking down doors and dragging off civilians to be tortured
in some god-forsaken hell-hole. Those are Bush’s planes and
Bush's troops! He’s the one who’s responsible.
Here’s an excerpt from an article I wrote just a few months
ago after the last bombing in Samarra:
“Less than 4 hours after the explosion, the Bush public
relations team cobbled together a statement that the bombing
was the work of Sunni extremists or al Qaida terrorists.
But, they’ve never produced a scintilla of evidence to
support their claims. It may be that the administration
simply saw the bombing as an opportunity to twist the facts
to suit their own purposes.
After all, the incident has been a propaganda-bonanza for
the Bush team. They’ve used it to support their theory that
Iraq is “the central battle in the war on terror” and that
“we must fight them there if we don’t want to fight them
over here”. It’s been used as one of the main justifications
for the occupation; implying that the US military is needed
as a referee to keep the warring factions from killing each
other. It’s all just nonsense that’s designed to advance the
administration’s political agenda.
If there had been an investigation, it would have shown
whether or not the perpetrators were experts by the
placement of the explosives. They might have found
bomb-residue which could have determined the composition of
the material used. Forensics experts could have easily
ascertained whether the explosives came from Iraqi
munitions-dumps (as suggested) or from outside the country
(like the USA, perhaps?)
The incident may well have been a “false flag” operation
carried out by US intelligence agencies to provoke sectarian
violence and, thus, reduce the number of attacks on American
troops. (That is what the vast number of Sunnis and Shiites
believe)
In any event, as soon as the mosque was destroyed the media
swung into action focusing all of its attention on sectarian
violence and the prospect of civil war. The media’s
incessant “cheerleading” for civil war was suspicious, to
say the least.
In the first 30 hours after the blast, more than 1,500
articles appeared on Google News providing the government
version of events without deviation and without any
corroborating evidence; just fluff that reiterated the
Pentagon’s account verbatim and without challenge.
1500! Now that’s a well-oiled propaganda system!
Most of the articles were “cookie cutter-type” stories which
used the same buzzwords and talking points as all the
others; no interviews, no facts, no second opinions; simple,
straightforward stenography - nothing more.
The story was repeated for weeks on end never veering from
the same speculative theory. Clearly, there was a push to
convince the American people that this was a significant
event that would reshape the whole context of the war in
Iraq. In fact, the media blitz that followed was bigger than
anything since 9-11; a spectacular display of the media’s
power to manipulate public opinion.
There were a few articles that didn’t follow the party-line,
but they quickly disappeared into a cyber-“black hole” or
were dismissed as conspiracy theories. One report in AFP
said that the bombing “was the work of specialists” and the
“placing of explosives must have taken at least 12 hours”.
Ah-ha!
The article said: “Construction Minister Mohammed Jaafar
said, ‘Holes were dug into the mausoleum’s four main pillars
and packed with explosives. Then charges were connected
together and linked to another charge placed just under the
dome. The wires were then linked to another charge placed
just under the dome. The wires were then linked to a
detonator which was triggered at a distance.”
Of course, what does that prove? Perhaps, al Qaida has
skilled explosives experts? But why not investigate? After
all, if this was the “catalyzing event” which thrust the
country towards civil war; why not have the FBI come in and
take a look-around?
A professional team of investigators could have quickly
determined whether highly-trained saboteurs were operating
in the area. (which meant that American troops would be at
greater risk) Isn’t that worth checking out?
Nope. The Pentagon did nothing. There was no effort at all
to find out who might have been involved. It was an open and
shut case; wrapped up before the dust had even settled in
Samarra.
Very strange.
Apparently, there was at least one witness who was
interviewed shortly after the bombing. He said that he heard
cars running outside the mosque “the whole night until
morning” but, he was warned “to stay in your shop and don’t
leave until morning”.
At 6:30 AM the next morning, the vehicles outside the mosque
left. 10 minutes later the bombs exploded.
None of the people living in the vicinity of the mosque were
ever questioned. Likewise, the Construction Minister
Mohammed Jaafar has never resurfaced in the news again. I
expect that his comments in the newspaper may have had
something to do with his sudden disappearance, but then
maybe not. (Bush’s
War on Perception
the bombing of the Golden Mosque, Mike Whitney)
Here’s an excerpt from another article titled “Information
Warfare, Psy-ops and the Power of Myth”
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17078.htm
New Clues in the Bombing
New clues have surfaced in the case of the bombing of the
Golden Mosque which suggests that the claims of the Bush
administration are false. An article by Marc Santora, (“One
Year Later, Golden Mosque still in Ruins”, New York Times)
provides eyewitness testimony of what really took place one
year ago:
“A caretaker at the shrine described what happened on the
day of the attack, insisting on anonymity because he was
afraid that talking to an American could get him killed. The
general outline of his account was confirmed by American and
Iraqi officials.
The night before the explosion, he said, just before the 8
p.m. curfew on Feb. 21, 2006, on the Western calendar, men
dressed in commando uniforms like those issued by the
Interior Ministry entered the shrine.
The caretaker said he had been beaten, tied up and locked in
a room.
Throughout the night, he said, he could hear the sound of
drilling as the attackers positioned the explosives,
apparently in such a way as to inflict maximum damage on the
dome”. (NY Times)
Clearly, if the men were men dressed in “commando uniforms
like those issued by the Interior Ministry”, then the
logical place to begin an investigation would be the
Interior Ministry. But there's never been an investigation
and the caretaker has never been asked to testify about what
he saw on the night of the bombing. However, if he is
telling the truth, we cannot exclude the possibility that
paramilitary contractors (mercenaries) or special-ops
(intelligence) agents working out of the Interior Ministry
may have destroyed the mosque to create the appearance of a
nascent civil war.
Isn’t that what Bush wants----to divert attention from the
occupation and to show that the real conflict is between
Shiites and Sunnis?
It's unlikely that the mosque was destroyed by “Sunni
insurgents or Al Qaida” as Bush claims. Samarra is
predominantly a Sunni city and the Sunnis have nearly as
much respect for the mosque as a cultural icon and sacred
shrine as the Shiites.
The Times also adds, “What is clear is that the attack was
carefully planned and calculated”.
True again. We can see from the extent of the damage that
the job was carried out by demolition experts and not merely
“insurgents or terrorists” with explosives. Simple forensic
tests and soil samples could easily determine the
composition of the explosives and point out the real
perpetrators.
The Times even provides a motive for the attack: “Bad people
used this incident to divide Iraq on a detestable sectarian
basis.”
Bingo! The administration has repeatedly used the incident
to highlight divisions, incite hostilities, and prolong the
occupation.
The Times also notes the similarities between 9-11 and the
bombing of the Golden Mosque: “I can describe what was done
as exactly like what happened to the World Trade Center.”(NY
Times)
In fact, the bombing of the Golden Mosque is a reenactment
of September 11. In both cases an independent investigation
was intentionally quashed and carefully-prepared narrative
was immediately provided. The administration’s version of
events has been critical in creating the rationale for an
extended US military occupation of Iraq, but is it true.
Probably not. The so-called “deeply ingrained sectarian
animosity between Sunnis and Shiites” has no historical
precedent. It is an invention of propagandists in the
intelligence services who intend to fragment the Iraqi state
so that precious resources can be more easily controlled.
“Divide and rule” continues to be the driving force behind
America’s aggressive counterinsurgency strategy.
THE SECOND BOMBING OF THE GOLDEN DOME MOSQUE
Here’s excerpt from another article which outlines some of
what we know about the second bombing of the Golden Dome
Mosque a year later: (The Battle of Gaza,
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17894.htm
)
Graham Bowley (“Minarets on Shiites Shrine in Iraq Destroyed
in Attack” NY Times) clarifies some of the important details
of what took place at the site of the Mosque just prior to
the second bombing. He says:
“Since the attack in 2006, the shrine had been under the
protection of local — predominantly Sunni — guards. But
American military and Iraqi security officials had recently
become concerned that the local unit had been infiltrated by
Al Qaeda forces in Iraq. A move by the Ministry of Interior
in Baghdad over the last few days to bring in a new guard
unit — predominantly Shiite — may have been linked to the
attack today.”
No reference is made to the sudden and unexplained changing
of the guards at the mosque in future accounts in the
mainstream press. And, yet, that is the most important
point. The minarets were blown up just days after the new
guards took charge. They cordoned off the area, placed
snipers on the surrounding rooftops, and then blew up the
minarets in broad daylight.
The first explosion took place at 9:30 AM. Ten minutes later
the second bomb was detonated.
Al Qaeda?
Not likely.
The Golden Dome mosque has been heavily guarded ever since
it was blown up in 2006. The four main doors have been
bolted shut and not a tile has been moved in over a year.
The reason for this is that the Shiites consider it a “crime
scene” which they intend to investigate more thoroughly when
the violence subsides.
The Shiites never accepted the official US-version of events
that “al Qaeda did it”. Many believe that US Special Forces
were directly involved and that it was a planned demolition
carried out by experts. There is considerable proof to
support this theory including eye witness accounts from the
scene of the crime as well as holes that were drilled in the
floor of the mosque to maximize destruction. This was not a
simple al Qaeda-type car-bombing but a technically-demanding
demolition operation.
The damning information in the New York Times article has
been corroborated in many other publications including an
official statement from the Association of Muslim Scholars
in Iraq (AMSI). According to the AMSI, Prime Minister Nouri
al Mailiki replaced the Sunnis who had been guarding the
site for over a year with Shiite government forces from the
Interior Ministry. Their statement reads:
“Security forces arrived yesterday afternoon from Baghdad
Tuesday for the receipt of the task of protecting two tombs
instead of the existing force there. Somehow they obtained a
scuffle followed by gunfire lasted two hours over control of
security forces coming from Baghdad."
So, the Sunni guards were replaced (after a scuffle) with
goons from the Interior Ministry. The next day the minarets
blow up.
Coincidence?
Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki immediately issued
statement where he claimed that the al Qaeda was responsible
for the attack. At the same time, however, he arrested all
12 of the guards he sent from the Interior Ministry.
Why? Was he afraid they would talk to the media?
The Association of Muslim Scholars said that “last year’s
explosion happened after a severe political crisis between
blocs involved in the political process to the occupation.
After the elections, the establishment of the government was
blocked at that time. It is quite similar to the political
crisis faced by the government and parliament today”.
The AMSI is right. The destruction of the Golden Dome Mosque
took place soon after the Iraqi parliament rejected the
US-plan for dividing Iraq. (“Federalism”) This time, the
parliament has voted-down the US-plan to transfer control of
Iraq’s vast petroleum reserves to the American oil giants
via the “oil laws”.
The AMSI sees the bombing as a desperate attempt by the US
occupation to break the logjam in Parliament over the oil
laws and to conceal the failures of the “surge” by inciting
sectarian violence. The only difference this time is that
the Shiite militias have been less responsive to US
manipulation. In fact, Shiite cleric Muqtada al Sadr has
tried to stop his Mahdi Army from attacking Sunni areas and
he has decried the bombing as another plot by US-Israeli
intelligence agents operating in Iraq. He said that the
incident reveals “the hidden hand of the occupier.”
He added, “This is what the occupiers brought to Iraq: a
disintegration plot and fanning the flames of sectarian
violence. Destroying the Askariya shrine goes exactly with
the insurgents' beliefs.”
Among Shiites, there’s nearly unanimous agreement that the
US was behind the bombing. Middle East expert Juan Cole
reports on his blog-site “Informed Comment, that protests
have broken out in India, Pakistan, the Caucasus, Bahrain,
Iran and other locations where there are high concentrations
of Shiites. The consensus view is that the minarets were
blown up as part of a larger US-Israeli strategy for
controlling the Middle East.
But why would the Bush administration want to unleash a
fresh wave of sectarian violence when they can’t even
establish security in Baghdad?
Here’s what the AMSI says:
“Sectarian violence is an effective means to enable the
militias to fully impose their control on (Sunni)
neighborhoods and cities as it did after the bombings of
Samarra….The government is also trying to control the
capital of Baghdad; seeking to extend its power over other
cities that reject the occupation, especially the cities of
Baquba and Samarra”.
This is what is gained by the bombings—further ethnic
cleansing of the Sunni neighborhoods and greater control
over the public through a campaign of terror. It’s all part
of a broader neocon strategy that centers on “creative
destruction” rather than the traditional US policy of
“regional stability
Final Comment
The bombing of the Golden Dome Mosque is a psychological
operation (psy-ops) that evolved from the theories of former
Counselor at the State Dept, Philip Zelikow, (Zelikow was
also executive director of the 9-11 Commission and author of
the National Security Strategy NSS) Zelikow “is an expert in
“the creation and maintenance of ‘public myths’ or ‘public
presumptions’, which he defines as beliefs thought to be
true although not necessarily known to be true with
certainty, shared in common with the relevant political
community. He has taken a special interest in ‘searing’ or
‘molding’ events that take on ‘transcendent’ importance and,
therefore, retain there power even as the experiencing
generation passes from the scene”. (“Thinking about
Political History” Miller Center report; winter 1999)
“In the Nov-Dec 1998 issue of Foreign Affairs he co-authored
an article called ‘Catastrophic Terrorism’ in which he
speculated that if the 1993 bombing of the World Trade
center had succeeded ‘the resulting horror and chaos would
have exceeded our ability to describe it. Such an act of
catastrophic terrorism would be a watershed event in
American history. ‘It could involve loss of life and
property unprecedented in peacetime and undermine America’s
fundamental sense of security, as did the Soviet bomb test
in 1949. The US might respond with draconian measures
scaling back civil liberties, allowing wider surveillance of
citizens, detention of suspects and use of deadly force.
More violence could follow, either future terrorist attacks
or US counterattacks. Belatedly, Americans would judge their
leaders negligent for not addressing terrorism more
urgently”. (Wikipedia)
Zelikow’s theories help us understand how “catastrophic
events” are being used to shape public consciousness and
create a narrative that advances the political objectives of
the people in power. The actual facts about the bombing of
the shrine are have been intentionally suppressed while the
prevailing theory—that we are fighting Al Qaida in Iraq—has
been meticulously maintained with a solid wall of
disinformation. The media has played a central role in this
process by disseminating the official storyline from every
outlet and newspaper without challenging the government’s
“uncorroborated” assertions. This has had a deeply corrosive
effect on American democracy.
The extraordinary expansion of state power has been
legitimized by the deliberate misreading of “catastrophic
events”. History, legal precedent and even cultural
tradition have been brushed aside in an effort to
rationalize a new order in which state repression,
autocratic rule and aggressive war are deemed the requisite
components of national security. The entire human
experiment---dating back tens of thousands of years--is now
conveniently divided into two parts: pre-9-11 and post 9-11.
The bombing of the Golden Dome Mosque has been used the same
way as 9-11. A “unifying myth” has been build around a
“catastrophic event” in a way that serves the overall goals
of the political establishment. As we have seen, the facts
don’t matter as long as the illusion that we are fighting
terrorists is maintained. (According to Anthony H. Cordesman,
an Iraqi specialist at the Centre for Strategic and
International Studies in Washington, al Qaida’s attacks make
up only 15 per cent of the total in Iraq though they launch
80-90 per cent of the suicide bombings”. Patrick
Cockburn).In reality, the US is engaged in a brutal colonial
war that has destroyed a sovereign nation that posed no
threat to American national security. That obvious fact
never finds its way into America’s “free press”.
The Bush administration and their enablers in the Pentagon’s
“Dept. of Strategic Information” will continue to promote
their threadbare narrative of “foreign fighters and
terrorists” until the Iraq mission collapses and the troops
are withdrawn.
Until then, many more lives will be sacrificed to preserve
the myth of a war on terror. Haitham Sabah al-Baderi was one
such victim. His assassination has helped to conceal the
fact that 700,000 Iraqis have been butchered without cause
in their own country by Bush’s army.
Click
on "comments" below to
read or post comments
Comment
Guidelines
Be succinct, constructive and
relevant to the story.
We
encourage engaging, diverse and
meaningful commentary. Do not
include personal information such
as names, addresses, phone
numbers and emails. Comments
falling outside our guidelines
those including personal
attacks and profanity are
not permitted.
See our complete
Comment
Policy and
use
this link to notify us if you
have concerns about a comment.
Well promptly review and
remove any inappropriate
postings.
Send Page To a Friend
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)
|