Stock
Market Brushfire; Will there be a run on the banks?
By Mike Whitney
08/12/07 "ICH"
-- - On Friday, the Dow Jone’s clawed its way back from
a 200 point deficit to a mere 31 point loss after the
Federal Reserve injected $38 billion into the banking
system. The Fed had already pumped $24 billion into the
system a day earlier after the Dow plummeted 387 points.
That brings the Fed’s total commitment to a whopping $62
billion.
By some estimates, $326.3 billion has now been added to the
G-7 Nations’ intra-banking system to prevent a breakdown.
That amount will rise considerably in the weeks ahead as the
situation continues to deteriorate. Some readers may
remember that on Tuesday, August 7, the Fed announced that
it was NOT planning to bail out the market.
My, how quickly things change.
So far, economic pundits and CEOs have applauded the Fed’s
intervention as a “constructive” way of staving off an
impending credit crisis.
Are these same “experts” who always sing the praises of
unregulated “free markets” while condemning any government
intervention?
Yes.
The investment banks and fund mangers love “free markets”
when it means eliminating the rules that prevent them to
“gaming the system”. But they don’t like it so much when
their shabby Ponzi-rackets start to unravel. Then they’re
the first in line to beg for a bailout.
That’s what’s happening right now. The Fed is keeping the
stock market afloat by increasing liquidity at the banks. If
it wasn’t for Bernanke’s billions of dollars of low interest
credit---the banking system and stock market would collapse
in a heap. The Fed’s “not-so-invisible hand” is the only
thing holding the whole dilapidated system in place.
Is that the way it’s supposed to work in a free market
system---with the Fed acting as the nation’s Economic
Central Planner intervening whenever it suits the interests
of its wealthiest constituents?
Sounds more like a Financial Politburo, doesn’t it?
In truth, the “free market” means nothing to the men who run
the system. It’s just a public relations scam designed to
dupe investors into plunking their money into a system
that’s rigged for the carnivores at the top of the economic
food-chain.
Does anyone really believe that the market-commissars would
allow the system to operate according to the arbitrary
swings in investor confidence and random speculation?
This is THEIR SYSTEM and they run it THEIR WAY. The only
time that changes is when their twisted schemes go haywire
and they need a handout from the taxpayer. In the present
case, they are asking Big Brother Bernanke to bail them out
on trillions of dollars of non-performing subprime
garbage-loans which masquerade as securities in the
secondary market. The Fed has already indicated that it is
only-too-willing to help.
But what good will it do?
The banks are currently holding (roughly) $300 billion in
collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) and another $225
billion in collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) More than
one-half trillion dollars in debt which is essentially
“illiquid” and has no clear market value. They could be
worthless for all we know.
That hasn’t stopped the Fed riding to the rescue, buying up
many of these toxic CDOs and increasing banking reserves so
the great fractional banking con-game can continue unabated.
This is what one astute observer called “alchemy finance”.
Central banks around the world have opened up the liquidity
spigots to avoid a global credit meltdown. But their efforts
are bound to fail. The banks are sitting on huge losses from
assets that they can’t move through the pipeline and which
have gobbled up their reserves. Bloomberg News summed it up
like this: “The $2 trillion market for mortgages not backed
by government-sponsored agencies is at a standstill”.
The same is true of the corporate bond market. As the Wall
Street Journal reported last week:
“The investment grade corporate bond market HAS GROUND TO A
HALT, making it difficult for companies to access capital
and hard for investors to find a place to put their money to
work. ….The problems in the primary market could, if they
persist, throw a wrench in the workings of corporate
America, making it tougher for companies to finance, among
other things, investments, buyouts and equity buybacks….For
July, corporate bond issuance was down 77% from June.”
(“Corporate Bond Market has come to a Standstill”, Wall
Street Journal)
The mighty wheels of commerce have rusted in place. Nothing
is moving. Only the sense of panic continues to grow.
Trillions of dollars poisonous CDOs need to unwind, but the
banks cannot put them up for bid for fear that they’ll only
get pennies on the dollar. This is what a slow-motion
train-wreck looks like. The Fed’s cheap credit won’t help
either. At best, it’ll just buy a little time before the
true value of these bonds is established and trillions of
dollars in market capitalization vanish into cyber-space.
Banks, equities, hedge funds, insurance companies and
pension funds are all in line to suffer major losses.
The irony, of course, is that the Federal Reserve created
this mess by lowering interest rates to 1% and flushing
trillions of dollars into the economy. That cheap money
created a series of lethal equity-bubbles in housing,
credit, stocks and bonds which are quickly falling to earth.
Expanding the money-supply might be a short-term fix, but
it’s really just throwing more gas on the fire. Why add
hyper-inflation to the long-list of existing problems?
The volatility in the stock market is a red herring. We
should be paying attention to the underlying problems which
are just now beginning to surface. The banks have been
originating loans and bundling them off to Wall Street to
avoid the normal reserve requirements. Now they’ve been
“caught short” and don’t have adequate funding to cover
their bets. If the Fed doesn’t help out, we’ll see at least
one or two major bank closures.
This is a story that won’t appear in the media. Bank-runs
are the beginning of the end---financial Armageddon.
And there’s more bad news, too. If the stock market corrects
more than 10 or 15%, the massive overleveraged $1.7 trillion
hedge fund industry will crash-and-burn. This may explain
why the stock market has behaved so erratically recently.
There have numerous late-day rallies with no good news to
support the soaring equities prices. Is the market being
micro-managed behind the scenes to keep it above a certain
level?
Many people think so. There’s been a flood of articles about
the activities of the Plunge Protection Team’s in the last
two weeks. The Fed’s desperate infusions of credit into the
banking system will only reinforce growing suspicions of
market manipulation.
DERIVATIVES DOWNDRAFT
Banks routinely hedge against adverse moves in the market by
purchasing various types of insurance in the form of
derivatives contracts. Derivatives trading has skyrocketed
in the last few years and the “British Bankers Association
estimated last fall that by the end of 2006, the market for
all credit derivatives was $20 trillion and expected to be
$33 trillion by the end of 2008.”These relatively new
instruments are about to be put to the test by worsening
market conditions. “Hedge funds may account for as much as
30% of such credit protection” but that is little solace for
the banks “because hedge funds that are losing money but
also selling credit insurance may not be able to honor their
commitments, rendering the protection worthless.” (“Insuring
against Credit Risk can carry risks of its own” Henny
Sender, Wall Street Journal)
Credit insurance in the form of credit default swaps have
created a false sense of security that may prove to be
unfounded. In fact, the Credit insurance business has
probably encouraged lenders to make shakier and shakier
loans believing that they were protected from risk. But that
doesn’t appear to be the case. For example, Bear Stearns
tried to soothe investor’s fears during the collapse of its
two hedge funds by pointing to its derivatives coverage.
“Bear executives repeatedly referred to their dependence on
hedges, including credit derivatives, to offset their losses
on subprime mortgages and loans to poorly rated companies,
stating that such hedges would offset losses.” (Ibid, H.
Sender, Wall Street Journal)
We all know how that story ended up.
Derivatives have been celebrated as a critical part of the
“new architecture of the financial markets”. Now we can see
that they are poor-performers under real-life conditions and
liable to trigger an even greater disaster. If the stock
market stumbles, we can expect a major breakdown in credit
insurance-trading with trillions of dollars in derivatives
disappearing overnight.
The abstruse world of derivatives trading will suddenly
explode onto the headlines of newspapers across the country.
HOUSING BRUSHFIRE SWEEPS THROUGH THE ECONOMY
The contamination from the massive real estate bubble has
now infected nearly every area of the broader market. The
swindle which began at the Federal Reserve--with cheap, low
interest credit---has spread through the entire system and
is threatening to wreak financial havoc across the planet.
The Fed’s multi-billion dollar bailout will do nothing to
contain the brushfire they started or avert the catastrophe
that lies just ahead. Greenspan opened Pandora’s Box and
we’ll all have to live with the consequences.
Click
on "comments" below to
read or post comments
Comment
Guidelines
Be succinct, constructive and
relevant to the story.
We
encourage engaging, diverse and
meaningful commentary. Do not
include personal information such
as names, addresses, phone
numbers and emails. Comments
falling outside our guidelines
those including personal
attacks and profanity are
not permitted.
See our complete
Comment
Policy and
use
this link to notify us if you
have concerns about a comment.
Well promptly review and
remove any inappropriate
postings.
Send Page To a Friend
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)
|