India's Agrarian Martyrs: Are you listening?
By Jessica Long
08/13/07 "ICH
" ----- Many of us remember the crucial failure
of the WTO's Fifth Ministerial Conference in Cancun, Mexico
in 2003. It was on this day that Lee Kyung Hae, leader of
the Korean Federation of Advanced Farmers, discovered that
his loudest voice was in death.
Wearing a sandwich board that read, "The WTO kills
farmers!"- Lee took a knife and stabbed himself in the
chest. His death was ignored by the WTO and the mainstream
media. Given the lack of attention, many argue that his
violent end was in vain. Sadly, his dishonored death is one
of thousands being ignored by corporate mainstream media.
In 2003, 17,107 farmers committed suicide. In the last few
years, the number of documented suicides in India's rural
areas has skyrocketed. These suicides have become so
commonplace that they are mystifying a nation and polarizing
the debate over biotechnology.
On the surface, the massive numbers of farmer suicides lack
the social unity and revolutionary opposition other
revolutions employ. In fact, the local Indian government
refuses to address the correlation between agrarian suicides
and economic exploitation, making it difficult for the
international public to apply real social forces to these
farmers’ actions.
However, research shows the massive numbers of farmer
suicides are linked not only with economic disparity, but
with corporate exploitation by multinational agribusinesses.
Whether addressed as "agrarian martyrs" or merely desperate
peasantry, exploited Indian farmers, like Lee Kyung Hae,
have found that their loudest voice is in death.
In a religiously and ethnically segmented nation, their
actions have founded a cultural unity that confronts the
evils of globalization. Thus, the insanely high volume of
farmer suicides serves as a shockingly unique medium of
proletarian outcry.
The Republic of India is one of the top twelve nations in
the world in terms of biodiversity. Featuring nearly 8% of
all recorded species on Earth, this subcontinent is home to
47,000 plant species and 81,000 animal species.
Simultaneously, India is home to the largest network of
indigenous farmers in the world. Yet biotechnology has led
to extreme environmental degradation in the region,
threatening to replace its diverse ecology with corporate
hybrid monoculture. The original Green Revolution was
supposed to save 58 million Indian hectares. Today, 120
million of the 142 million cultivable hectares is degraded-
over twice the magnitude that the Green Revolution attempted
to save! In the Indian state of Punjab, 84 of the 138
developmental blocks are recorded as having 98% ground water
exploitation. The critical limit is 80%. The result has had
devastating impacts on the agricultural community, leaving
exploited farmers with little choice of action. In the past
six years, more than three thousand farmers have committed
suicide in Andrha Pradesh, that is six to ten farmers
everyday! When did this start? Why is this occurring?
And why have such little media attention been given to this
crisis?
There are three potential causes for the onset of these
self-inflicted massacres:
1) exploitation by multinational agribusinesses
2) severe economic disparity and
3) a means of resistance by exposing the abuse of the
agrarian sphere.
In 1998, around the inception of mass farmer suicides, the
World Bank imposed regulations that opened up India’s seed
market to corporate multinationals like Monsanto.
Non-renewable GM crops now replaced a self-sustainable
farming system that had been perfected over thousands of
years.
While corporate agribusinesses impose their hybrid
monoculture on peasant farmers, they refuse to consider the
biodiversity that is desired to maintain traditional
practices.
For example, 75% of cultivable Indian land exists in dry
zones. Non GM rice utilizes 3,000 liters of water in order
to produce one kilo, while non-renewable hybrid rice
requires 5,000 liters per kilo! Cotton, largely considered
the “pesticide treadmill,” makes India the third largest
cotton grower in the world, accounting for 1/3 of its export
earnings.
Continuous GM cotton crop failures resulted in the state of
Andrha Pradesh, the seed capital of India, prohibiting the
sales of Bt cotton varieties by Monsanto. This perpetual
poverty is sustained by the bourgeois pursuit of maximizing
production at the lowest possible expense!!!!!
Last year the Indian government forced Monsanto to cut the
royalties they receive from the patented seeds in India- but
Monsanto has appealed to the Indian Supreme Court. The
economic disparity of Indian farmers only increases as they
try to keep up with the lowest import prices. It is
estimated that they are losing $26 billion annually.
In fact, non Indian farmers receive six times the amount of
GDP that Indian farmers get, requiring an exorbitant amount
of loans to be taken out. While 90% of farm loans come from
money lenders, they are charged anywhere from 36-50%
interest, placing them in a cyclical mode of poverty. Surely
poverty alone cannot be responsible for such massive amounts
of bloodshed! After all, poverty has always existed, so what
is it about current conditions that have led to all this
bloodshed? The fact is that mass suicides have transformed
these farmers into agrarian martyrs for peasants everywhere.
Their deaths are inspiring significant social forces both by
the government and among its citizens. In response to the
crisis, the government has implemented compensation laws in
which the victim’s family receives free electricity and
$3,500. In response to economic disparity, the Indian
government imposed a one year suspension for all agriculture
loans while waiving interest.
However, monetary compensation laws only provide more
economic incentive for suicide, thus the citizens of India
are forced to devise alternative solutions to the problem.
Arguably, the mass suicides can be seen as a revolutionary
tactic... Dr. R. Raghuarami, an Indian psychologist, argues
that many of the farmers are takingtheir lives with direct
intent of addressing attention to the agrarian struggle. He
argues that “suicide by one farmer is inviting others to do
the same." The All Indian
Kisan Sabha (AIKS), or peasants front of the Communist Party
in India view this agrarian crisis as a direct result of
proletarian exploitation. S. Ramachandran Pillai, AIKS
president, “called for a united movement of the peasantry to
fight the neo-liberal imperialist offensive looming large
all over the country." AIKS has formed allies with other
social groups like the Agricultural Workers Union, Adivasi
Kshema Samithi, Center for Indian Trade Unions and the
Democratic Youth Federation of India to combat neoliberalism
and to voice demands for proletariat justice.
The nation is calling upon cultural unification to combat
the imperialist offensive and the corrupt bourgeois
government. The debate on the true reasons for the uproar of
suicides and the effects of GM crops remains heated... but,
unfortunately, it is very likely that the rest of the world
would not have been aware of this current crisis if it were
not for these intense disputes. With each passing day, an
estimated seven more farmers die.... the question remains,
are you listening?
Jessica Long graduated Western Washington University with
a degree in Political Science. When she's not travelling the
world, she makes her home in Washington State.
Click
on "comments" below to
read or post comments
Comment
Guidelines
Be succinct, constructive and
relevant to the story.
We
encourage engaging, diverse and
meaningful commentary. Do not
include personal information such
as names, addresses, phone
numbers and emails. Comments
falling outside our guidelines
those including personal
attacks and profanity are
not permitted.
See our complete
Comment
Policy and
use
this link to notify us if you
have concerns about a comment.
Well promptly review and
remove any inappropriate
postings.
Send Page To a Friend
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)
|