Obstructing the War on Iran
By Dr. Elias Akleh
08/13/07 "ICH" -- -- Many military officials, political
analysts, and strategy study groups anticipated the war
against Iran to be launched at the beginning of 2007,
sometime between mid January and late April, when weather
conditions would be ideal for aerial sorties and naval
invasion. The signs were apparent with the heavy naval
traffic in the Arabian Gulf, and the number of the conducted
war games on both sides.
Yet, we are now in August and war did not start. Did the
Bush administration cancel its war plans after all the
aggressive war-mongering rhetoric and threats, and after
spending millions of Dollars sending American nuclear
aircraft carriers with their battle groups to the gulf? Did
Cheney’s fiery threats and promises to attack Iran’s nuclear
facilities lose their flames? Or maybe Israel and its AIPAC
had stopped pressuring the Administration to hit Iran’s
nuclear facilities observing the statement of Israeli
Strategic Affairs Minister, Avigdor Lieberman, to the
Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee on 28th
February 2007 that Israel can deal with Iranian nuclear
threat alone if necessary. “We can face the country (Iran)
even if we’re left to face them one-on-one”, he stated.
The decision to attack (nuke) Iran was not cancelled but
obstructed.
Iran is different than Iraq. It is a larger country and has
more natural resources than Iraq. Although the US had
imposed economical sanctions on Iran since the Islamic
Revolution in 1979, and had pushed Iraqi Saddam Hussain into
an eight-year war against Iran to exhaust the country, the
Iranians grew more independent and industrious instead.
The economic sanction was not unanimous and many countries
continued trading with Iran. Many European and Asian
countries were dependent on Iranian oil and gas supplies for
their own energy. They also had the large Iranian consumer
market for their own goods. The sanctions against Iran were
in effect sanctions against these other countries, which
were in competition against American companies for consumer
markets. European countries, led by France, had always been
in economical and political competition against the US since
its independence. This competition is apparent in France’s
positions towards American policies in the Middle East.
France opposed American invasions of Afghanistan and of
Iraq. The French President, Jacques Chirac, stated in March
2003 “Iraq today does not represent an immediate threat that
justifies an immediate war.” This drew a lot of opposition:
the American administration dubbed France “Old Europe” and
tried to change the name of the “French fries” to “freedom
fries” in an attempt to belittle France. France feels it is
loosing its footage in the Middle East due to American
aggressive policies that is why it is keeping close contact
with the Lebanese to counter the American meddling in
Lebanon. Recently France had entered into agreement to build
a peaceful nuclear reactor in Libya in an attempt to gain
footage there.
Iran Sanction Act, expected to be passed by the congress, is
calling for American disinvestment in any foreign energy
company that invest more than $20 million in Iran. This Act
is facing a fierce opposition from European countries such
as France, Germany and UK, among others, who had sent their
diplomats to lobby against the Act on Capitol Hills. The Act
would hurt major European energy companies such as French
Total, Royal Dutch Shell and Repsol of Spain. The latter two
are involved in $10 billion investment to produce Iran’s
liquefied natural gas. American divestment in such companies
would adversely affect American public sector pension funds
especially Calpers and Calstrs; giant California pension
plans. Sanctions against Iran hurt the US itself more than
anybody else.
Iran’s eight-year war with Iraq had really strengthened the
Iranian military, who bought more advanced weaponry mainly
from US competitor Russia, and who started building their
own military equipments such as armored tanks, navy vessels,
submarines, un-manned drones and missiles. Iran had also
re-started its nuclear program under the supervision and
help of Russia. This infuriated the American administration,
who launched a political campaign to stop Iran’s nuclear
ambitions accusing them of manufacturing nuclear bombs.
The real reason of the conflict is not the bomb itself for
the US, itself, is building more nuclear bombs – tactical
bombs-, and Israel, Pakistan, India, and North Korea, all
non-members of the NPT, had built their own nuclear bombs
but the US did not send its nuclear carriers to their
shores. Instead the US is turning its eyes away from the
Israeli bombs, has effective control of Pakistani bomb
through controlling the Pakistani leader Perves Musharraf,
gained control over Indian nuclear facilities after entering
recently into agreement to supply India with nuclear fuel,
and finally has neutralized North Korean nuclear facilities
through negotiations and economical bribes. The real reason
of the conflict is the competition for exclusive monopoly of
the perceived future energy resources (nuclear fuel) to rake
in money, and to indirectly control other countries.
American violations of international law and invasion of
Iraq gave a warning to all the countries of the world that
US intends to take advantage of the global unipolar power
situation to expand its influence over the global vital
natural resources especially oil in order to subjugate the
rest of the world. Countries, especially Iran, started
forming economical and political alliances to counter the
global bully – USA. The European Union invited Eastern Bloc
states, separated now from Soviet Union, to join in. Russia,
Iran, Venezuela, Oman, United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Egypt,
Libya, Indonesia, Malaysia, Bolivia, Brunei, and Tobago had
launched a Gas OPEC in April 9th 2007 to counter American
control over Oil OPEC. Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO),
an Asian regional organization to enhance security, economic
and cultural cooperation, was launched by China and Russia
and encompasses central Asian states such as Kazakhstan,
Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan. Iran has applied to
enter this organization as a member to gain more support.
India, Russia, and China had entered into a trilateral
cooperation agreement in February 2007 intended to promote
international harmony and understanding. No doubt that the
cooperation of these three Asian big powers is intended to
counter the American influence in the region. Both China and
Russia are allies of Iran, involved in extensive military
cooperation agreements. They are major actors in Central
Asian oil and have significant strategic and economic
interests in Central Asia and the Caspian Sea basin.
The Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has been a very
busy President. He traveled to many countries to build
bilateral relations and to gain political support. He
visited the US to explain his country’s position concerning
its nuclear program. He visited Venezuela and formed
alliance with Chavez. He attended the Non-Aligned Movement
Summit in Cuba in September 2006. He visited Sudan in
February 2007 and met with President Omar Al-Bashir in an
attempt to improve political relations and criticized the
West for meddling with Sudanese affairs in Darfur. He
visited Gulf States including Saudi Arabia last March
explaining that Iran has no conflict with them, yet advising
them to expel the American military bases in their
countries. He warned that in case of American war against
Iran his country would strike these military bases that
might result in some collateral damages to their countries.
This visit led Kuwait to announce that it would not allow
its country to be used as a launching pad for a war against
Iran. Ahmadinejad had also visited Belarus last May to
improve bilateral cooperation between the two countries.
Monday, August 6th, Ahmadinejad visited Algeria, who had
always stood against isolating Iran, to strengthen bilateral
relations. Iran has also offered to share peaceful nuclear
technology with Algeria; a clear statement that Iran has
become a nuclear country, and a challenge to other nuclear
technology exporting countries. Nicaragua has also singed an
agreement with Iran on August 8th to export food stuff to
Iran for Iranian help to build hydraulic power plants.
Ahmadinejad’s visitations are clear proof of American
failure to isolate Iran.
Iran has robust military capabilities as was demonstrated
during August 2006 war games. Participating in the war games
of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) with
Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan, Iran had
demonstrated large scale military capabilities. Iran has
Russian sophisticated early warning radar stations, anti
aircraft missile launchers, stealth long range Fajr and
Shahab missile bases that could hit Israel, cruise missile
sites scattered along Iranian borders, submarines and
missile launching speed boats that could easily sink an
aircraft carrier and block the Strait of Hormuz, and atop of
all that Iran has 14 military airfields housing
sophisticated Russian as well as Iranian air fighters. It
was also revealed that Iran has produced pilotless stealth
drones with a range of 700km that are undetected by radars.
Iran is adding to its air power 250 advanced long-range
Russian made Sukhoi-30 multi mode fighter jets that could
function as air patrol, air defense, ground attack, and
air-to-air combat.
The most feared and effective Iranian weapon is the carrier
destroying supersonic Russian-built SS-N-27B missile, know
to American military as the sizzler. This missile has the
potential of performing high defensive maneuvers including
sharp-angled dodges. This missile could not be detected
until it hits its target. The American navy has no
assurances that its Aegis system is capable of detecting,
tracking and intercepting this sizzler.
Iran is capable of defending itself and would inflict large
casualties on its attackers.
On the other side the American/Israeli position is getting
weaker. Bush’s lies to attack Iraq were exposed, atrocities
perpetrated by American soldiers against Iraqis filled
foreign media, CIA’s illegal renditions and tortures became
well known around the world, and the Israeli murders of
Palestinian civilians, the destruction of their homes, the
usurpation of their land, and Israeli violations of
Palestinian human rights and their intent to wipe
Palestinians off existence are being globally recognized and
opposed by so many nations and political organizations. The
world no longer trust the US nor Israel.
Americans themselves had lost confidence in their
administration and in their decisions. The US army is having
trouble meeting their recruiting goals, so it is offering
$20,000 bonus to new and prior recruits, who would ship out
to Iraq and Afghanistan within 30 days after training. The
Administration finds it very expensive to replace cheap
regular soldiers with the very expensive “Blackwater”
professional mercenaries.
Arab governments allied with the US, such as Egypt, Jordan,
and the Gulf States are afraid that war on Iran would engulf
and consume their countries and results in their loss of
leaderships. US ambassador to the UN, Zalmay Khalilzad, had
accused Saudi Arabia and other Iraqi neighboring countries
(CNN interview Sunday 7/29) of destabilizing Iraq and
opening their borders to terrorists to enter Iraq. Iraqi
officials had also accused Saudi Arabia of funding Sunni
fighters in Iraq. Condoleezza Rice and Defense Secretary
Robert Gates needed to exercise arms twisting during their
visits to Egypt and Saudi Arabia (end of July) to put these
governments back in line.
The Administration is still having trouble drawing and
implementing plans to create an emergency oil reserve in
case Iran closes the Straits of Hormuz. Oil prices are
swinging up and down every week.
The neoconservative Bush administration, and its supporting
military complex, considers war on Iran as the fuse that
will explode the whole Middle Eastern region into a state of
“constructive chaos” that would allow them to implement
their “New Middle East” plans. Unlike the war on Iraq, which
was merely a testing experiment, the war on Iran, as was
discovered lately, needs thorough planning due to
anticipated long lasting effects on global economy, and
reshaping of global political structures especially in the
Middle Eastern region.
Although Iran is a member of the NPT and it keeps
emphasizing that its nuclear program is peaceful and had
offered international monitoring of its nuclear facilities,
there is still fear that Iran might one day develop a bomb.
Such bomb would tip the power balance in the Middle East and
become a deterrent to Israeli aggression and expansion, and
might force Israel to accept a peace treaty with the Arabs.
It could also form an obstacle to the American expansion in
the Middle East and South East Asia. The French foreign
minister Dominique de Villepin, at the time, stated that
Iran wants to have the bomb as a self-defense deterrent
weapon, while French President, Jacques Chirac, stated that
“nuclear Iran does not pose any threat on world peace”. He,
later, was pressured to withdraw this statement. Israeli
officials, on the other hand, keep threatening to strike
Iran’s nuclear facilities if the US does not do it.
Continuously threatening to strike Iran, Cheney keeps urging
Bush to directly confront Iran by launching air strikes
against alleged Iranian terrorist training camps. Despite
Afghan President, Hamid Karzai’s declaration during his
interview on CNN Sunday August 8th that “So far, Iran has
been a helper (in the fight against terrorism)”, President
Bush keeps threatening Iran of consequences of “…
transporting, delivering EFPs (explosively formed
penetrators), highly sophisticated IEDs (improvised
explosive devices) that kill Americans in Iraq”. Bush
ignores the fact that the British Independent had revealed
on March 5th 2006 that these alleged Iranian explosive
devices were initially created by the British Security
Services in the early 1990s, and that when the military
provided reporters with pictures of theses explosives they
had names, specifications and manufacturing dates in English
not in Farsi.
The Administration is spreading fear of expanding nuclear
Iran in the Gulf States. To allegedly counter and contain
the growing power of Iran in oil Gulf region the
Administration is seeking a congressional approval of an arm
sale package to the Gulf States; Saudi Arabia, Bahrain,
Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, and UAE, totaling to $20 billions. This
sale would include advanced weaponry such as advanced
satellite-guided bombs, upgrades to fighter planes, and new
naval vessels.
These advanced weapons would be stored in the desert for the
use of the American military if and when a 911 or a Gulf of
Tonken similar attack happens against an American base or
naval vessel in the Gulf. Then the Administration would
claim it its duty to retaliate against Iran in self-defense.
Such a scenario might take place at the end of Bush’s
presidency, when his administration would start the war and
leave the mess to the next administration to clean up.
Dr. Elias Akleh is an Arab writer of Palestinian descent,
born in the town of Beit-Jala. Currently he lives in the US.
Click
on "comments" below to
read or post comments
Comment
Guidelines
Be succinct, constructive and
relevant to the story.
We
encourage engaging, diverse and
meaningful commentary. Do not
include personal information such
as names, addresses, phone
numbers and emails. Comments
falling outside our guidelines
those including personal
attacks and profanity are
not permitted.
See our complete
Comment
Policy and
use
this link to notify us if you
have concerns about a comment.
Well promptly review and
remove any inappropriate
postings.
Send Page To a Friend
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)
|