Why Cheney
Really Is That Bad
By Scott Ritter
08/23/07 "Truthdig" --- - Karl Rove,
interchangeably known as “Boy Genius” or
“Turd Blossom,” has left the White
House. The
press conference announcing his decision
to resign has been given front-page
treatment by most major media outlets, but
the fact of the matter is the buzz
surrounding Rove’s departure is much ado
about nothing, especially in terms of coming
to grips with the remaining 16 months of the
worst presidency in the history of the
United States.
Rove is a domestic political marauder, the
personification of a conservative movement
which lacks a moral compass and has a
complete disregard for facts. The master of
exploiting mainstream America’s predilection
for news-as-entertainment, under which the
likes of
Rupert Murdoch can manufacture headlines
out of thin air, Rove helped turn “fair and
balanced” into a national joke which
everyone laughs at but few actually
comprehend. Rove served as the maestro of a
political-smear orchestra composed of such
intellectually challenged muckrakers as Sean
Hannity, Rush Limbaugh and Ann Coulter,
manipulating the NASCAR/professional
wrestling crowd’s addiction to seedy gossip
in an effort to maintain the all-important
51 percent majority needed to win elections.
Perhaps if the Democratic Party had
possessed a semblance of organization and
cohesion (not to mention a post-Clinton
message that could be sold to a majority of
America), then Rove would be but a footnote
in history, known simply as the man who
helped the worst governor in the history of
Texas get elected. Even the
self-destructive campaign run by Al Gore in
2000, in which he
distanced himself from a sitting
president who, despite all of his faults,
would have defeated Bush in a landslide if
the Constitution permitted a third term, was
enough to deny Rove his beloved 51
percent—it was Gore, not Bush, who
won the majority of votes in that
contest. It took a Republican governor of
Florida, backed by a compliant Supreme
Court, to put George W. Bush into the White
House, not any genius on the part of Rove.
“Bush’s Brain” may claim that it was his
careful manipulation of fiction over fact
that carried the 2004 election, in which the
term
became synonymous with political character
assassination, but it was the events of
Sept. 11, 2001, and the war in Iraq which
sank the Democratic Party and its candidate
for president, John Kerry. It is very
difficult to unseat a president in a time of
war, especially when so many Democrats voted
in favor of the concept, first by buying
into every post-9/11 policy put forward by
the Bush administration (find me one
Democrat who actually read the
Patriot Act in its entirety before it
was voted into law) and second by
rubber-stamping the lies that led to Bush’s
decision to invade Iraq in March 2003.
Remember, it was
Kerry’s inarticulate defense of his
decision to vote in favor of granting war
powers to the president that sank his
election hopes, not his Vietnam War record.
Certainly, Karl Rove played a significant
behind-the-scenes role in supporting Bush’s
war policies. The perjury trial of
“Scooter” Libby forced the collective of
deaf, dumb and blind pseudo-journalists who
populate what is known as the mainstream
media in America to recognize how
pathetically duplicitous and petty the Bush
administration could get when it came to
defending the policies propping up the
so-called Global War on Terror and the awful
tragedy of Iraq. Rove’s fingerprints were
all over the decision by Vice President Dick
Cheney to
leak CIA officer Valerie Plame’s name to
the media in an effort to thwart the
truth-telling of her husband, former
Ambassador Joe Wilson.
But that is about as deep as Rove’s
involvement in the two issues that will
define the presidency of George W. Bush
gets. While Rove might be the “genius”
behind the kind of winner-takes-all dirty
politics that won the Republicans a majority
in Texas The vice president is the single
greatest threat to American and
international security in the world today.
Not Osama Bin Laden. Not the ghost of
Saddam Hussein. Not Ahmadinejad or Kim Jung
Il. Not al-Qaida, the Taliban, or Jose
Padilla himself. Not even George W. Bush
can lay claim to this title. It is Dick
Cheney’s alone. Operating in a never-never
land of constitutional ambiguity which
exists between the office of the president
and the Congress of the United States,
Cheney’s office has made its impact felt on
the policies of the United States of America
as had no vice president’s office before
him. Granted unprecedented oversight over
national security and foreign policy by
executive order in early 2001, many months
prior to the terror attacks of 9/11, Cheney
has single-handedly steered America away
from being a nation among nations (albeit
superior), operating (roughly) in accordance
with the rule of law, and toward its present
manifestation as the new Rome, a decadent
imperial power bent on global domination
whatever the cost.
The absolute worst of the rot that has
infected America because of the policies and
actions of the Bush administration has
originated from the office of the vice
president. The nonsensical response to the
terror attacks of 9/11, seeking a “global
war” versus defending the rule of law at
home and abroad, taking the lead in
spreading the lies that got us involved in
Iraq, legitimizing torture as a tool of
American jurisprudence, advocating for
warrantless wiretappings of U.S.-based
communications (regardless of what the
Fourth Amendment says against illegal search
and seizure), and pushing for an expansion
of America’s global conflict into Iran—all
can be traced back to the person of Cheney
as the point of origin.
America today is very much engaged in a
life-or-death struggle against the forces of
evil. The enemy resides not abroad,
however, but at home, vested in the highest
offices of the land. Neither Osama Bin
Laden nor Saddam Hussein threatened the life
blood of the United States—the
Constitution—to the extent that Cheney has.
Not Hitler, Stalin, Mao or Ho Chi Minh. Not
since the American Civil War has there been
a constitutional crisis of the magnitude
that exists today, threatening to rip the
very fabric of American society apart at the
seams, courtesy of Dick Cheney.
That Congress today remains relatively mute
on this crisis is one of the great mysteries
of our time. Perhaps the vagaries of
national politics can be blamed. The
Democratic majority in Congress appears to
have ceded its leadership role to unelected
presidential candidates who seem solely
empowered to comment on current events,
domestic or foreign, and who, out of fear of
any misstep which could hurt their chances
to seize the White House as their own,
refuse to actually take a substantive stand
against the policies of the Bush
administration. In an effort that is
curiously Rovian in the quest for electoral
victory, the Democratic candidates (with a
few notable exceptions) have been less than
bold in their opposition to the heinous
policies that are currently in place
concerning Iraq, Iran, the war on terror,
torture and constitutional violations—unless
you count empty rhetoric.
In many ways, the leading Democrats, both
those running for office and those currently
holding office, are a far greater insult to
American values than the conservative
standard-bearers for the policies of
Cheney. No one of substance takes seriously
the manic ranting of the Hannity/Limbaugh/Coulter
triad. These Democrats, on the other hand,
have mastered the art of compromise to the
point that they stand for nothing at
all—this at a time in American history when
the policies of the administration, derived
from the dark abyss of Bush’s soul, Cheney,
provide the most concrete example of what we
as Americans should be standing against.
The Democrats need to stand for something.
Cheney has provided the sort of political
ammunition that would enable them to fight,
and win, a constitutional battle over the
heart of America, the kind of defining
struggle which I believe the vast majority
of Americans would rally around. Unless the
Democrats start separating themselves from
the policies of the Bush administration, and
take an active role in outing and
suppressing the true evil that is Dick
Cheney, all they will achieve in the coming
years is a change in the titular political
orientation of America, without the kind of
deep-seated break from the failures and
crimes of the past six-plus years that have
taken our nation, and the world, right up to
the edge of chaos.
“Bush’s Brain” may be gone, but his “Soul”
lives on. It is high time all of America
put Dick Cheney fully in the spotlight of
collective accountability, purging our
nation of this scourge which has harmed us
in so many ways. If there is any case for
impeachment to be made against any member of
the Bush administration today, it can be
made against a vice president who has shamed
our nation, destroyed our moral standing and
broken our laws.
Click
on "comments" below to
read or post comments
Comment
Guidelines
Be succinct, constructive and
relevant to the story.
We
encourage engaging, diverse and
meaningful commentary. Do not
include personal information such
as names, addresses, phone
numbers and emails. Comments
falling outside our guidelines
those including personal
attacks and profanity are
not permitted.
See our complete
Comment
Policy and
use
this link to notify us if you
have concerns about a comment.
Well promptly review and
remove any inappropriate
postings.
Send Page To a Friend
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)
|