Bush Reacts To Gonzales Resignation
By RTT News
08/27/07 "RTT
News"
--- President Bush reacted with unusual candor
Monday to the resignation of U.S. Attorney General
Alberto Gonzales.
“It is sad that we live in a time when a talented
and honorable person like Alberto Gonzales is
impeded from doing important work because his good
name was dragged through the mud for political
reasons,” Bush said at a press conference in
Crawford, Texas.
The President praised Gonzales for his “integrity,
decency and principle.” He added that in his two and
a half years as attorney general, Gonzales “has
played a critical role in shaping our policies and
the war on terror and has worked tirelessly to make
this country safer.”
The two men have shared a close personal and
professional relationship since 1995, when as Texas
governor Bush requested Gonzales to be his general
counsel. Like his professional and personal
friendship with Karl Rove, Bush said of Gonzales “In
the long course of our work together, this trusted
advisor became a close friend.” Bush acknowledged
the effects of the controversy surrounding Gonzales,
citing “months of unfair treatment” that resulted in
“a harmful distraction at the justice department.”
Gonzales is the latest in a series of Bush loyalists
forced to resign amid controversial circumstances.
The casualties include chief political strategist
Karl Rove, White House counselor Dan Bartlett,
budget director Rob Portman, chief White House
attorney Harriet Miers, political director Sara
Taylor, deputy national security advisers J.D.
Crouch and Meghan O'Sullivan and Defense Secretary
Donald Rumsfeld. Bush's poll numbers hit record lows
in 2007, with his approval rating hovering around 30
percent.
Embattled U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales
informed the President of his decision to resign
late Sunday, capping a bitter fight with
congressional Democrats amid allegations he perjured
himself in testimony before Congress on President
Bush's domestic wiretapping program.President Bush,
who stood by Gonzales through a series of
controversies, accepted Gonzales' resignation Friday
and is expected to nominate Homeland Security
Secretary Michael Chertoff to fill the vacancy left
by his longtime friend and legal adviser, according
to senior White House officials.
"Yesterday, I met with President Bush and informed
him of my decision to conclude my government
services as Attorney General of the United States
effective September 17," Gonzales said in a brief
statement Monday morning.Gonzales, 51, who withstood
months-long controversy over the firings of eight
federal prosecutors for what critics charged were
politically motivated reasons, had resisted calls
for his resignation from Democrats and some
Republicans, including Sen. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma.
While Gonzales said he might have mishandled the
U.S. attorney firings, the former Texas Supreme
Court justice maintained the ousters were in no way
politically motivated to influence federal
investigations involving lawmakers.
But tensions between Gonzales and Democratic leaders
in Congress boiled over after Gonzales testified
before the Senate Judiciary Committee and
discrepancies emerged between what Gonzales and an
intelligence official said about the National
Security Agency's then-classified warrantless
surveillance program.
In congressional testimony, Gonzales said the
purpose of a March 10, 2004 White House briefing was
to address "intelligence activities" that were the
subject of a legal dispute inside the Bush
administration, and not called over the National
Security Agency's warrantless surveillance program.
However, a letter sent to Congress in May 2006 by
then-Director of National Intelligence John
Negroponte described the congressional meeting as a
"briefing on the Terrorist Surveillance Program,"
the name that President Bush has publicly used to
refer to the program.
Trying to clear up the misunderstanding with the
Senate Judiciary Committee, Gonzales sent a two-page
letter to the Committee confirming that there was a
dispute between the Justice Department and the White
House in March 2004, but conceded he was not clear
in his explanations.
"I recognize that the use of the term Terrorist
Surveillance Program and my shorthand reference to
the 'program' publicly 'described by the president'
may have created confusion, particularly for those
who are knowledgeable about the N.S.A. activities
authorized in the presidential order," Gonzales
wrote.
He added that the confusion might have been most
intense among those "who may be accustomed to
thinking of them or referring to them together as a
single N.S.A. program." Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt.,
chairman of the Judiciary committee, said Gonzales'
resignation "reinforces what Congress and the
American people already know — that no Justice
Department should be allowed to become a political
arm of the White House, whether occupied by a
Republican or a Democrat."
Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., also a member of the
Senate Judiciary Committee and ardent critic of
Gonzales, said the attorney general had done "the
right thing" by resigning.
"The Justice Department has been virtually
nonfunctional and desperately needs new leadership.
Democrats will not obstruct or impede a nominee who
we are confident will put the rule of law above
political considerations," Schumer said.
Copyright © 2007 RealTimeTraders.com
Click
on "comments" below to
read or post comments
Comment
Guidelines
Be succinct, constructive and
relevant to the story.
We
encourage engaging, diverse and
meaningful commentary. Do not
include personal information such
as names, addresses, phone
numbers and emails. Comments
falling outside our guidelines
those including personal
attacks and profanity are
not permitted.
See our complete
Comment
Policy and
use
this link to notify us if you
have concerns about a comment.
Well promptly review and
remove any inappropriate
postings.
Send Page To a Friend
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)
|