|
Pentagon
‘three-day blitz’ plan for Iran
By Sarah Baxter
09/02/07 "The
Times" -- - Washington -- THE Pentagon has
drawn up plans for massive airstrikes against 1,200 targets
in Iran, designed to annihilate the Iranians’ military
capability in three days, according to a national security
expert.
Alexis Debat, director of terrorism and national security at
the Nixon Center, said last week that US military planners
were not preparing for “pinprick strikes” against Iran’s
nuclear facilities. “They’re about taking out the entire
Iranian military,” he said.
Debat was speaking at a meeting organised by The National
Interest, a conservative foreign policy journal. He told The
Sunday Times that the US military had concluded: “Whether
you go for pinprick strikes or all-out military action, the
reaction from the Iranians will be the same.” It was, he
added, a “very legitimate strategic calculus”.
President George Bush intensified the rhetoric against Iran
last week, accusing Tehran of putting the Middle East “under
the shadow of a nuclear holocaust”. He warned that the US
and its allies would confront Iran “before it is too late”.
One Washington source said the “temperature was rising”
inside the administration. Bush was “sending a message to a
number of audiences”, he said ? to the Iranians and to
members of the United Nations security council who are
trying to weaken a tough third resolution on sanctions
against Iran for flouting a UN ban on uranium enrichment.
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) last week
reported “significant” cooperation with Iran over its
nuclear programme and said that uranium enrichment had
slowed. Tehran has promised to answer most questions from
the agency by November, but Washington fears it is stalling
to prevent further sanctions. Iran continues to maintain it
is merely developing civilian nuclear power.
Bush is committed for now to the diplomatic route but thinks
Iran is moving towards acquiring a nuclear weapon. According
to one well placed source, Washington believes it would be
prudent to use rapid, overwhelming force, should military
action become necessary.
Israel, which has warned it will not allow Iran to acquire
nuclear weapons, has made its own preparations for
airstrikes and is said to be ready to attack if the
Americans back down.
Alireza Jafarzadeh, a spokesman for the National Council of
Resistance of Iran, which uncovered the existence of Iran’s
uranium enrichment plant at Natanz, said the IAEA was being
strung along. “A number of nuclear sites have not even been
visited by the IAEA,” he said. “They’re giving a clean bill
of health to a regime that is known to have practised
deception.”
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Iranian president, irritated the
Bush administration last week by vowing to fill a “power
vacuum” in Iraq. But Washington believes Iran is already
fighting a proxy war with the Americans in Iraq.
The Institute for the Study of War last week released a
report by Kimberly Kagan that explicitly uses the term
“proxy war” and claims that with the Sunni insurgency and
Al-Qaeda in Iraq “increasingly under control”, Iranian
intervention is the “next major problem the coalition must
tackle”.
Bush noted that the number of attacks on US bases and troops
by Iranian-supplied munitions had increased in recent months
? “despite pledges by Iran to help stabilise the security
situation in Iraq”.
It explains, in part, his lack of faith in diplomacy with
the Iranians. But Debat believes the Pentagon’s plans for
military action involve the use of so much force that they
are unlikely to be used and would seriously stretch
resources in Afghanistan and Iraq
© Copyright 2007 Times Newspapers Ltd.
Click
on "comments" below to
read or post comments
Comment
Guidelines
Be succinct, constructive and
relevant to the story.
We
encourage engaging, diverse and
meaningful commentary. Do not
include personal information such
as names, addresses, phone
numbers and emails. Comments
falling outside our guidelines
– those including personal
attacks and profanity – are
not permitted.
See our complete
Comment
Policy and
use
this link to notify us if you
have concerns about a comment.
We’ll promptly review and
remove any inappropriate
postings.
Send Page To a Friend
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)
|
