|
In Memory of
Benazir Bhutto
Cut U.S. Ties to
Musharraf
By Medea Benjamin
12/28/07 "ICH" -- - Our
hearts and thoughts are with the Pakistani people as they mourn
the death of Benazir Bhutto. We extend our deep sorrow to her
family and the millions of supporters who for decades have seen
the Bhutto family as a source of inspiration. We also extend our
condolences to the families of the other Pakistanis who were
killed in this heinous crime.
We at CODEPINK were in touch with the former Prime Minister when
we were writing our book Stop the Next War Now. In fact, Bhutto
graciously contributed an essay that was a plea to counter
extremism and "a clash of civilizations that can lead to
Armageddon, where there will be no winners on earth."
Bhutto's assassination is a blow to people all over Pakistan,
and the world, who hold life sacred and believe in the basics
precepts of democracy. It is also a blow to women worldwide who
took strength from seeing such a courageous, articulate and
charismatic woman playing a leadership role in a powerful Muslim
country. Inside Pakistan, even her most bitter critics wept at
the news of her death, understanding that it is indeed a dark
day when assassination becomes a tool for eliminating opposing
viewpoints.
There is much speculation about who committed this odious act.
It could certainly be religious militants opposed to a leader
like Bhutto who repeatedly expressed her determination to combat
violent extremists. Bhutto was perceived by many Pakistanis as
too "pro-Western," especially after remarks that if elected
Prime Minister, she might allow U.S. military strikes inside
Pakistan to eliminate al-Qaeda.
But it is not too far-fetched to think that the assassination
could have been orchestrated by Pervez Musharraf or members of
the military. Many in Pakistan speculated that the government
was responsible for the bomb blasts that killed 140 Pakistanis
when Bhutto first returned home on October 18, citing the fact
that the street lights were turned off just before the attack
and questioning the lack of a serious investigation afterwards.
In fact, Musharraf had refused Bhutto's request that an
independent foreign team be brought in to help with the
investigation. This time, there must be a serious investigation
conducted by a body independent of the government and those
responsible must be found and held accountable.
Elections scheduled for January 8 must be postponed. Even before
this tragedy, there were no conditions for free and fair
elections. The Musharraf regime had fired independent judges,
censored the press and stacked the Election Commission. It is
absolutely key that an independent judiciary and free press be
restored, and that elections then be scheduled under the aegis
of an independent electoral commission.
The international community must put pressure on Musharraf not
to use this tragedy to impose another round of emergency rule
like the one he imposed on November 3, which led to the
crackdown on lawyers, students, journalists and other members of
Pakistan's vibrant civil society. Bhutto's death will be doubly
tragic if it becomes an excuse for Musharraf to stifle the very
civil society that is the true bulwark against extremism.
If Bhutto's death proves anything, it is the utter failure of
Musharraf's regime and the utter failure of the Bush
administration's policy of supporting Musharraf. Pakistani civil
society has long been calling for Musharraf to resign. Now
leaders like former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif have added their
voice to that call, publicly holding Musharraf responsible for
Bhutto's death and demanding he step down.
CODEPINK agrees that Musharraf is the biggest obstacle facing a
democratic Pakistan today. He is not capable of either fighting
extremists or building a society that respects the rule of law.
My colleague Tighe Barry and I recently had a taste of his
dictatorial ways when we were kidnapped and carjacked at
gunpoint and then deported for supporting the pro-democracy
movement.
The US government must use this time to radically change its
policy in Pakistan. The Bush administration has been a staunch
supporter of Musharraf, providing his regime with over $10
billion in financial aid since 2001. In return, Musharraf was
supposed to fight religious extremists. But Osama bin Laden has
never been caught, and in the last few years al-Qaeda and the
Taliban have become stronger in Pakistan. In the meantime,
Musharraf's use of US funds to crack down on the country's
democratic forces has led to growing anti-American sentiments
among the nation's moderate, secular forces. The U.S. government
should withhold assistance until Musharraf steps down and a
caretaker government restores the independent judiciary, lifts
restrictions on the press and sets up the conditions for fair
elections.
We should also begin to focus our attention on one of the key
underlying causes for the growth of extremism in Pakistan: the
extreme poverty that persists, especially in the tribal areas
where al-Qaeda is most active.
Benazir Bhutto spoke about this in the essay she wrote for our
book. Her words were poignant then, and are even more poignant
upon her death:
"The neglect of rising poverty against the background of
religious extremism can only complicate an already difficult
world situation," she said. "The war against terrorism is
primarily perceived as a war based on the use of force. However,
economics has its own force, as does the desperation of families
who cannot feed themselves.
"Militancy and greed cannot become the defining images of a new
century that began with much hope. We must refocus our energy on
promoting the values of democracy, accountability, broad-based
government, and institutions that can respond to people's very
real and very urgent needs."
We, as global citizens, can pay tribute to Bhutto by rising to
her challenge. Whether in Pakistan or in our home countries, we
can dedicate ourselves to building a world based on tolerance,
cooperation and fulfilling the urgent needs of the human
family--which are the pillars of a more peaceful world.
Click on "comments" below to read or post comments
Comment Guidelines
Be succinct, constructive and
relevant to the story.
We encourage engaging, diverse
and meaningful commentary. Do not include
personal information such as names, addresses,
phone numbers and emails. Comments falling
outside our guidelines – those including
personal attacks and profanity – are not
permitted.
See our complete
Comment Policy
and
use this link to notify us if you have concerns
about a comment.
We’ll promptly review and remove any
inappropriate postings.
Send Page To a Friend
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)
|