|
A Lasting
Settlement?
While George Bush talks up the prospects for peace, in reality
he backs Israel's assault on Palestinians' legitimate national
aspirations
By Karma Nabulsi
11/01/08 "The
Guardian"
-- -- West Point was the first United States
military post built after the Declaration of
Independence. It had been designed and constructed
by
Tadeusz Kosciuszko, republican visionary, hero
of the American Revolution and the 1794 Polish
Uprising, and one of the greatest liberation figures
in modern history. Kosciuszko believed and fought
for a vision of an America emancipated from foreign
rule, an America of both individual and collective
liberty, a country that only waged wars of self-defence,
and never wars of aggression and occupation. He was
one of the founders of a great American tradition,
the practice of hope and audacity in the struggle
for freedom.
That practice was
contesting a tradition of colonisation, slavery and
empire - indeed, in appreciation of his contribution
at West Point, Kosciuszko's commanding officer gave
him the gift of a slave. Kosciuszclo immediately
freed him, stating that all forms of slavery must be
resisted, and that, in the contest for the soul of
the republic, the side of liberation must always be
chosen. To this very day, the American republic is
constantly shaped by this ongoing battle between the
tradition of cynicism and that of hope, one of
conservative reaction versus progressive values and
freedom.
George Bush, as we know, does not come from that
rich and valiant tradition, of which Kosciuscko was
part, and which is so vibrant in the American body
politic of today. When it came to Palestine, George
Bush chose his side from the moment he took office,
and has confirmed his position at every opportunity
over the last seven years - and there have been
many. Under his presidency, the possibilities for
peace have nosedived spectacularly into a downward
and violent spiral of increasing conflict and
conquest. Israeli expansion and aggression was
actively encouraged and supported by the
neo-conservatives in his administration, and every
opportunity for progress towards peace derailed.
In Israeli hallways
yesterday, Bush was celebrated as the unwavering
supporter of Israel's expansionist policies that he
truly is, as he pressed ahead with a public
relations campaign that began at Annapolis - talking
future statehood for the Palestinians in theory, but
backing occupation policies in practice -
standing by as Olmert spoke of increasing
settlements in illegally annexed Arab East
Jerusalem. For the massive construction of Israeli
settlements on expropriated Palestinian land over
the last few years - illegal under international law
and condemned by almost every country in the world -
is only made possible by uncritical American
financial, military and diplomatic support for
Israel.
The accelerated
illegal settlements activity that kills all hope for
progress is not taking place in spite of President
Bush's role in the Middle East, but is, obviously,
directly connected to it: he will do nothing to stop
it. At the press conference in Ramallah, Bush
categorically dismissed United Nations
resolutions on settlements: "The UN deal didn't work
in the past ... this is an opportunity to move
forward and negotiate a new deal ... We can stay
stuck in the past, which will yield nothing good for
the Palestinian people or we can chart a hopeful
path for the future."
Palestine's future is intimately tied up with
America's, and Palestinian freedom is connected to a
particular tradition of American freedom that is
based on justice and equality, and on the
universality of human rights. So when Palestinians
today express despair about the present
administration's commitment to their freedom, it
does not mean they are despairing about the desire
for a better future, or that they are not committed
to peace, or that they do not possess the capacity
of hope. It simply means they have a more realistic
and pragmatic appreciation of their current
predicament than those who insist that Palestinians
should draw their hope from Bush's deadly
rhetoric.
When Kosciusko
launched the uprising in Poland in 1794, he
did so in the name of those who were fighting
for their freedom, as well as of those who were
withholding it from them: "For both our freedom and
for yours." It is that political tradition of hope
and of courage that will bring us all the peace we
have been seeking.
Click on "comments" below to read or post comments
Comment Guidelines
Be succinct, constructive and
relevant to the story.
We encourage engaging, diverse
and meaningful commentary. Do not include
personal information such as names, addresses,
phone numbers and emails. Comments falling
outside our guidelines – those including
personal attacks and profanity – are not
permitted.
See our complete
Comment Policy
and
use this link to notify us if you have concerns
about a comment.
We’ll promptly review and remove any
inappropriate postings.
Send Page To a Friend
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)
|