27/01/08 "The
Guardian" -- 25/01/08 -- Anyone with
a sense of human solidarity must surely celebrate
the demolition of the wall on the Gaza-Egyptian
border
on Wednesday and the mass exodus of hundreds of
thousands of Palestinians starved of basic supplies
of food, fuel and medicine by Israel's flagrantly
illegal act of collective punishment. There was
a further breakout today, when a bulldozer
pulled down a new section of the barrier.
It has been first and
foremost a human triumph. An occupied and imprisoned
people has taken its fate into its own hands and
broken a shameful blockade, enforced jointly by
Israel and Egypt with the support of the Bush
administration and the connivance of the US and
Israeli-backed rump Palestinian authority in
Ramallah.
But it is also a
political defeat for the cruelly-enforced attempt to
isolate and crush the elected Hamas leadership in
Gaza. By tearing down the walls that held 1.5
million people in the world's largest open air
prison, Gazans have broken the siege that
had become the main weapon to bring the
Palestinians to heel and impose a pliant leadership
and an occupier's settlement.
Egyptian forces
have been struggling to reseal the Rafah border
crossing. It was closed last summer in agreement
with Israel when Hamas took control of the Gaza
strip (see the piece by Yaakov Katz, Khaled Abu
Toameh and Herb Keinon in the
Jerusalem Post
of January 3 2008 on Israel's reaction to the recent
more modest breach for Hajj pilgrims). Israel had
meanwhile been sharply intensifying the squeeze on
supplies through its own closed border crossings
since it declared Gaza a "hostile territory" in
September, with predictably grim consequences, as UN
official Karen Koning AbuZayd
spelled out in the Guardian on Wednesday.
But the point has
now been clearly demonstrated that it can be
re-opened at will. Hamas has been strengthened and
the US-Israeli strategy of isolating the
Palestinians' most recently elected leaders is in
ruins. And the spectacle of Gazans holding candles
in Israeli-enforced darkness this week - echoing
Yasser Arafat's siege in Ramallah in 2002 - has
returned the Palestinian cause to the centre stage
of Arab politics.
There was some
speculation today - for example, by the
commentator Talal 'Awkal in the Palestinian
daily al-Ayyam - that Israel appeared to be hoping
for a reversion to Gaza's pre-67 status when it was
controlled by Egypt, perhaps as a precursor to
bringing the West Bank back into the Jordanian
orbit. That followed the remarks by Israel's deputy
defence minister Matan Vilnai on Thursday that the
opening of the Rafah border
could pave the way for Israel permanently to
hand over all responsibility for supplying Gaza to
Egypt.
Neither is a serious
option. The Palestinian national genie cannot be put
back in the bottle, despite current divisions. And
Israel remains the fully responsible occupying power
in Gaza, controlling its land access, sea and air
space and conducting regular military operations in
the territory at will.
Those "incursions"
are supposedly carried out to end rocket attacks
from Gaza into southern Israel. If so, they are
hopelessly ineffective. Benjamin Pogrund
asked this week: what can Israel do to stop the
rockets, which spread fear and demoralisation in
towns like Sderot, even if - unlike Israeli attacks
on Gaza - they rarely kill? The obvious answer is to
end its illegal occupation of the Palestinian
territories and negotiate a just settlement for the
refugees, ethnically cleansed nearly 60 years ago,
(who, with their families, make up a majority of the
Gaza Strip's population).
All the Palestinian
factions, including Hamas, accept that as the basis
for a permanent settlement or indefinite end of
armed conflict. In the meantime, the Palestinians
have the right to resist occupation, whether they
choose to exercise it or not. The dominant
Palestinian view - though not that of PA president
Mahmoud Abbas - has long been that negotiation
without some element of armed pressure is, as was
once said in a rather different British context, to
go naked into the conference chamber.
Even signficant
figures on the Israeli right - including Sharon's
former security adviser Giora Eiland, former Mossad
boss Efraim Halevi and ex-defence minister Shaul
Mofaz -
are coming to recognise that the refusal to talk
or deal with Hamas is going nowhere. And the
argument (made, for example, by senior British
ministers) that talks with Hamas will have to wait
until the organisation has been politically weakened
looks increasingly threadbare.
The same goes for
the PA leadership. Waiting for Hamas to go away
won't work. Only negotiations without preconditions
for Palestinian political reconciliation can both
restore national dignity and allow the Palestinians
out of the dead end they have been forced into by
relentless Israeli and US pressure. The magnificent
display of popular power this week has shown that
there are other ways ahead.