|
Israeli Lobby
Declares War On Gandhi
By Punyapriya
Dasgupta
12/02/08 "ICH" --
-- The problem the Israelis and their supporters have
with Gandhi refuses to go away.. In what they call their
pre-State era, they tried to get Mahatma Gandhi to endorse
their campaign to dispossess the Arabs and transform
Palestine into a Jewish homeland. He not only branded their
enterprise unjust but even made comments which lend support
to the Palestinian resistance that has been calumniated
more recently by Israel and its American backers as
terrorism. Today, the Israel lobby in America is baying for
the blood of Arun Gandhi for his temerity in advising the
Jews in Israel that it is time they got over their holocaust
fixation and for their own secure future moved on to build
peace and friendship with their neighbours.
Arun
Gandhi, a grandson of the Mahatma, together with his wife
Sunanda, founded the M.K.Gandhi Institute of Non-Violence in
Memphis to spread the Gandhian philosophy in America and
later made it a part of the University of Rochester.
Early last month Arun Gandhi
wrote
in a Washington Post blog:
“The Jewish identity in the past has been locked into the
holocaust experience – a German burden that the Jews have
not been able to shed. It is a very good example of a
community that can overplay a historic experience to the
point that it begins to repulse friends. The holocaust was
the result of the warped mind of an individual who was able
to influence his followers into something dreadful. But it
seems to me that the Jews today not only want the Germans to
feel guilty but the whole world must regret what happened to
the Jews. The world did feel sorry for the episode but when
an individual or a nation refuses to forgive and move on,
the regret turns into anger. The Jewish identity in the
future appears bleak. Any nation that remains anchored to
the past is unable to move ahead and especially a nation
that believes its survival can only be ensured by weapons
and bombs. In Tel Aviv in 2004, I had the opportunity to
speak to some MPs and peace activists all of whom argued
that the wall and the military build up was necessary to
protect the nation and the people. In other words, I asked,
you believe that you can create a snake pit with many deadly
snakes in it – and expect to live in the pit secure and
alive? What do you mean? they countered. Well, with your
superior weapons and your attitude towards your neighbours
would it not be right to say you are creating a snake pit?
Would it not be better to befriend those who hate you? Can
you not reach out to share your technical advantage with
your neighbours and build a relationship?”
This is vintage
Gandhian logic about the means to an end. Arun Gandhi is a
true inheritor of Gandhism except in such obsolete
externals as the asceticism the Mahatma espoused in dress
to identify himself with the poorest Indian nearly a century
ago. When the Israel lobbyists turned on him for what they
regard as sacrilege of the holocaust, Arun responded with
more of Gandhism. He resigned from the presidentship of the
institution of non-violence he had himself founded and
issued an apology:
“My statement on the
recent Washington Post blog was couched in language that
was hurtful and contrary to the principle of non-violence.
My intention was to
generate a healthy discussion on the proliferation of
violence. Clearly I did not achieve my goal. Instead,
unintentionally, my words have resulted in pain, anger,
confusion and embarrassment. I deeply regret these
consequences.
I would like to be a
part of as healing process. The principles of non-violence
are founded on love, respect, understanding and compassion.
It is my sincere hope that this situation will give me and
others the opportunity to work together and transform anger
and negative emotions, create deeper mutual respect and
understanding and build more harmonious communities.”
The Zionist response
was typical too. Not only was Arun Gandhi abused as soon as
the blog appeared, even his apology was rejected as not
enough or inconsequential. The Anti-Defamation League
adjudged him guilty of a classic attempt at blaming the
victim. Arun Gandhi was branded anti-semite by the Israel
lobbyists The director of the Simon Wiesenthal Institute
seized it as a not-to-be lost opportunity to extend his
sneer retrospectively to the Mahatma, a revered figure in
world history. Efraim Zuroff was quoted by the Jerusalem
Post as saying: “Even the great Mohandas Gandhi did not
have a monopoly on wisdom, evidence his suggested passive
resistance against the Nazis.” Someone may take this cue
and say that Arun Gandhi betrayed poor wisdom for he advised
the Palestinians to defeat the Israelis with a massive
non-violent march. John Mearsheimer who along with Stephen
Walt wrote about the Israel lobby and faced its full fury,
offered a consolation to Arun Gandhi with a comment that he
would have gotten into serious trouble with the lobby even
if he had chosen his words carefully ”simply because he had
criticized Israel and its American supporters, which one
does at his or her own peril.”
Sixty years after his
death Mahatma Gandhi still remains a thorn on Zionism’s
side. His view, written in 1938, remains in indelible print
and sharply relevant even now. “Palestine belongs to the
Arabs in the same sense that England belongs to the English
or France to the French. It is wrong and inhuman to impose
the Jews on the Arabs. What is going on in Palestine today
cannot be justified by any code of conduct. The Mandates
have no sanction but that of the last War. Surely it would
be a crime against humanity to reduce the proud Arabs so
that Palestine can be restored to the Jews partly or wholly
as their national home. I am not defending the Arab
excesses. I wish they had chosen the way of non-violence
in resisting what they rightly regarded as an unwarranted
encroachment upon their country. But according to the
accepted canons of right and wrong, nothing can be said
against the Arab resistance in the face of overwhelming
odds.”
Punyapriya Dasgupta,
journalist, can be reached at siliserh@yahoo.co.in
Click on "comments" below to read or post comments
Comment Guidelines
Be succinct, constructive and
relevant to the story.
We encourage engaging, diverse
and meaningful commentary. Do not include
personal information such as names, addresses,
phone numbers and emails. Comments falling
outside our guidelines – those including
personal attacks and profanity – are not
permitted.
See our complete
Comment Policy
and
use this link to notify us if you have concerns
about a comment.
We’ll promptly review and remove any
inappropriate postings.
Send Page To a Friend
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)
|