"Bernankerupted”:
Bear
Stearns Fire-sale sends Global Markets
Plunging; Dollar Routed
By Mike
Whitney
17/03/08
"ICH
" -- -- “It's a
snowball and it keeps getting bigger,”
Peggy Furusaka, credit specialist at BNP
Paribas SA in Tokyo.
Last
night, while America slept,
investors and dollar-holders around
the world held an impromptu election
on US stewardship of the global
economy. It was a spontaneous
referendum triggered by the sudden
collapse of Bear Stearns, but it
covered many of the issues that have
worried investors for the last seven
years: the unfunded Bush tax cuts,
the $2 trillion war in Iraq, the
Federal Reserves low-interest
bubble-making policies, the reckless
gutting of US industrial base, the
$4 trillion increase to the national
debt, the multi-billion dollar “no
bid” contracts, the opaque
deregulated financial system, and
the systematic destruction of the
world's reserve currency. The
ballots are still being counted, but
the outcome is certain. The Bush
administration lost in a landslide.
Investors have had enough Bush's
failed leadership and the Fed's
reckless, globally-destabilizing
monetary policies. A dollar-rout has
already begun in earnest and stock
markets around the world are
plummeting. The Hang Seng index
(Hong Kong) fell 4.3 percent to
21,279.40. Japan's benchmark Nikkei
index slumped 3.7 percent to finish
at 11,787.51, falling below 12,000
for the first time since August
2005. Shares throughout Europe
tumbled overnight, shaving tens of
billions off market capitalization.
The Fed's panicky bailout of Bear
Stearns and its surprise
quarter-point rate cut has ignited a
global equities sell-off and sent
the cost of protecting corporate
bonds through the roof. The economic
tsunami is presently right outside
New York ready to touch-down on Wall
Street at the opening bell. The
futures markets are already gyrating
wildly. It should be a raucous St
Patrick's day in the Big Apple.
Bernanke's
11th Hour Bailout of Bear
Sparks Market Freefall
In the end,
it was a race with the clock. The
Federal Reserve wanted to get a deal
done before the Asia markets opened
hoping to soothe jittery investors and
stop a full-blown stock market crash. It
was right down to the wire, too. Less
than an hour before trading began on
Japan's Nikkei Index, the sale of
beleaguered Investment giant, Bear
Stearns was announced on Bloomberg News.
Backed by a $30 billion line of credit
from the Fed, JP Morgan reluctantly
purchased Bear for the bargain-basement
price of $240 million or $2 per share.
Less than a year ago, Bear was riding
high at $170 per share, but that was
before the credit python had wrapped
itself around US financial markets. That
seems like ancient history now. Without
the Fed's intervention the
nearly-century old investment warhorse
would have been dragged from Wall Street
feet first. If the deal with JPM had
flipped, Bear would have been forced
into bankruptcy.
But
Bear's travails are just the beginning
of Wall Street's woes. Now there's talk
of Lehman Brothers going under.
According to the Wall Street Journal:
“Worries are deepening that other
securities firms and commercial
banks might be on shaky ground.
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. Chief
Executive Richard Fuld, concerned
about the markets and possible
fallout from Bear Stearns's
troubles, cut short a trip to India
and returned home Sunday, ahead of
schedule, according to people
familiar with the matter. The
decision came after a series of
calls Saturday to both senior
executives at the firm and Treasury
Secretary Henry Paulson, these
people say.” (“JP Morgan Rescues
Bear Stearns”, WSJ)
Mr. Fuld
has good reason to be concerned, too.
Economics professor Nouriel Roubini says
that, “Lehman's exposure to toxic ABS/MBS
securities is as bad as that of Bear:
according to Fitch at the beginning of
the turmoil Bear Stearns had the highest
toxic waste ("residual balance")
exposure as percent of adjusted equity
on balance sheet; the exposure of Bear
was 54.5% while that of Lehman was only
marginally smaller at 53.3%; that of
Goldman Sachs was only 21%. And guess
what? Today Lehman received a $2 billion
unsecured credit line from 40 lenders.
Here is another massively leveraged
broker dealer that mismanaged its
liquidity risk, had massive amount of
toxic waste on its books and is now in
trouble. Again here we have not only a
situation of illiquidity but serious
credit problems and losses given the
reckless exposure of this second broker
dealer to toxic investments.” (Nouriel
Roubini's Global EconoMonitor)
So, it
looks like Bear will be just the first
of many over-leveraged investment banks
on their way to the chopping block. As
credit gets tighter, banks will have to
call in their loans to pare down their
debts and increase their capital. That's
easier said than done in an environment
where consumer's are cutting back on
borrowing and traditional revenue
streams have dried up. The banks are
facing some stiff headwinds in the near
future.
The
Federal Reserve announced two
initiatives on Sunday designed to
“bolster market liquidity and
promote orderly market functioning.”
The Fed is “creating a lending
facility to improve the ability of
primary dealers to provide financing
to participants in securitization
markets. This facility will be
available for business on Monday,
March 17. It will be in place for at
least six months and may be extended
as conditions warrant. Credit
extended to primary dealers under
this facility may be collateralized
by a broad range of investment-grade
debt securities. The interest rate
charged on such credit will be the
same as the primary credit rate, or
discount rate, at the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York.”
This is
an incredible move and way beyond
the Fed's mandate to insure price
stability. Bernanke is now offering
to accept dodgy mortgage-backed
bonds from NON-BANK institutions.
Outrageous. We can be 100% certain
now, that Congress's closed door
meeting on Friday had nothing to do
with Bush's spying on American
citizens. Most likely, the Fed
convened the meeting to present
their extraordinary strategy to save
the financial system from a
Chernobyl-like meltdown.
The Fed
also announced a “decrease in the
primary credit rate from 3-1/2
percent to 3-1/4 percent (and) an
increase in the maximum maturity of
primary credit loans to 90 days from
30 days.” (Fed statement)
So
Bernanke has not only decided to
bailout the banks but everyone else
who is even remotely connected to
the subprime/securitization swindle.
Great. But the rest of the world is
not so convinced that this is
prudent economic theory, in fact,
foreign investors are already
shedding US debt instruments faster
than any time in history. Let's hope
that Bernanke realizes that foreign
Central Banks and investors
presently hold $6 trillion dollars
of US Treasuries and dollars and can
dump it on our shores whenever they
choose. That's enough greenbacks to
start a Wiemar-type blizzard that
will last until Resurrection Day.
Roubini
on the Fed's plan to provide loans
to non-bank institutions:
“By
having thrown down the drain the
decades old doctrine and rule that
the Fed should not lend or bail out
non-bank financial institutions the
Fed has created an extremely
dangerous precedent that seriously
aggravates the moral hazard of its
lender of last resort support role.
If the Fed starts on the slippery
slope of providing massive liquidity
support to non-bank financial
institutions that have recklessly
managed their risks it enters into
uncharted territory that radically
changes its mandate and formal role.
Breaking decades-old rules and
practices is a radical action that
seriously requires a clear public
explanation and
justification.”(Nouriel Roubini's
Global EconoMonitor)
It's
clear that Bernanke is just making
it up as he goes along. His actions
are unprecedented and, yes,
counterproductive. He's just
generating more panic among
investors. That doesn't help. Just a
few months ago, Bernanke was
reiterating his belief that markets
should operate with as little
government intervention as possible.
What a transformation. Now he has
nationalized the banking system and
is providing a backstop for
privately owned brokerages. What's
next; a bailout for the hedge funds?
There's
still a great deal that we don't
know about the Bear buyout. Like why
was it so important to save a bank
that had invested its shareholders
money so poorly in toxic bonds that
were virtually untested in stressful
market conditions?
It is
complicated, but the real reason for
the bailout is that the entire
financial industry is now
inextricably bound together through
multi-billion dollar counterparty
transactions called credit default
swaps and other unregulated
derivatives. When one major player
is stricken, the whole system can
violently unwind.
According
to the Wall Street Journal: “With each
firm intricately intertwined with others
in a maze of loans, credit lines,
derivatives and swaps, the Fed and
Treasury agreed that letting Bear
Stearns collapse quickly was a risk not
worth taking, because the consequences
were simply unknowable. ...For Fed
officials it was a difficult choice.
They did not want to single Bear out for
help and they realized their actions
aggravated "moral hazard" -- the
tendency of bailouts to encourage future
risky behavior. But the alternative was
potentially far worse. Bear risked
defaulting on extensive "repo" loans, in
which it pledges securities as
collateral for overnight loans from
money-market funds. If that happened,
other securities dealers would see
access to repo loans become more
restrictive. The pledged securities
behind those loans could be dumped in a
fire sale, deepening the plunge in
securities prices.” (“Fed Races to
Rescue Bear Stearns In Bid to Steady
Financial System”, Wall Street Journal)
So Bernanke
felt like he had no choice. He could
either bailout Bear or sit back and
watch a daisy-chain of defaults take
down one bank after another. Of course,
there was another option. The Fed and
the SEC could have fulfilled their
responsibilities as regulators and
insisted that derivatives trading come
under the purvue of government
officials. But, apparently, that was
never a serious consideration among the
non-interventionist free market
cheerleaders at the Federal Reserve.
They saw their job as simply enabling
their obscenely rich constituents to get
even richer while putting the public at
risk. Now it has all ended badly.
Saint
Patrick's Day Financial Chainsaw
Massacre
In less
than an hour, the stock market will open
and investors will get a chance to vote
on the Fed's latest plan to rescue the
US financial system. Good luck. The
dollar has already sunk to $1.59 per
euro, gold is up to $1017 per ounce, and
oil topped out at $111 per barrel; all
record highs. At the same time, foreign
investors have begun an informal boycott
of US debt. Last week's auction of US
Treasuries was the worst in a decade.
Thus, the anemic greenback has continued
its steady decline as the fundamentals
get weaker and weaker.
This
afternoon, at 2PM, President Bush will
meet with the Working Group on Financial
Markets (aka; the Plunge Protection
Team) at private White House meeting.
The group includes the Secretary of the
Treasury, the Chairman of the Federal
Reserve, the Chairman of the SEC, and
the Chairman of the Commodity and
Futures Trading Commission. The group of
financial heavyweights will update the
President on developments in the
equities markets and explain in greater
detail what Henry Paulson calls “the
systemic risk posed by hedge funds and
derivatives.” Of course, by then, the
blood could be running knee-deep down
Wall Street.
(Note; "Bernankerupted"
invented by Mish blogger named skeptic)