Amber Alert!
Get Ready
For War
By Justin
Raimondo
14/07/08
"Antiwar" --
- In spite
of
reassurances
from the
Washington
talking
heads and
policy wonks
that the
U.S. is not
about to
launch an
attack on
Iran, or
countenance
an Israeli
strike, the
Sunday Times
has the real
scoop:
"President
George W.
Bush has
told the
Israeli
government
that he may
be prepared
to approve a
future
military
strike on
Iranian
nuclear
facilities
if
negotiations
with Tehran
break down,
according to
a senior
Pentagon
official.
"Despite the
opposition
of his own
generals and
widespread
skepticism
that America
is ready to
risk the
military,
political,
and economic
consequences
of an
airborne
strike on
Iran, the
president
has given an
'amber
light' to an
Israeli plan
to attack
Iran's main
nuclear
sites with
long-range
bombing
sorties, the
official
told The
Sunday
Times.
"'Amber
means get on
with your
preparations,
stand by for
immediate
attack, and
tell us when
you're
ready,' the
official
said. But
the Israelis
have also
been told
that they
can expect
no help from
American
forces and
will not be
able to use
U.S.
military
bases in
Iraq for
logistical
support."
It seems,
however,
that the
Israelis
have already
been using
U.S. bases
in Iraq to
train for
the coming
attack.
There have
been denials
all around –
from the
Iraqis, the
Americans,
and the
Israelis –
but both the
Iraqi media
and the
Israeli
media have
reported, as
the New York
Post put it,
that
"Israeli
warplanes
have been
flying over
Iraq and
landing at
U.S. bases
there in
preparation
for an
attack on
Iran." The
Iraqi Web
site
Nahrainet
reported
Israeli
fighter jets
have been in
rehearsals,
so to speak,
for their
much-anticipated
strike at
Iran, flying
at night
over
Jordanian
airspace and
arriving at
U.S. air
bases in
Nasiriyah in
southern
Iraq and
near Haditha
in western
Anbar
province.
The
Israelis, in
concert with
their amen
corner in
the U.S.,
have been
engaged in a
propaganda
blitz
targeting
Iran's
alleged
nuclear
weapons
program, the
whole point
of which is
not to
pressure the
Iranians
into backing
down, but to
force the
U.S. to take
action in
lieu of the
Israelis
going it
alone. Why
fight if
your big
brother is
willing to
wage the
battle? To
that end,
the Israelis
are taking
aim at
Washington,
rather than
Tehran, in a
full-scale
political
assault that
shows every
sign of
succeeding
where it
counts – in
the Oval
Office. The
Times cites
a top
Pentagon
official:
"It's really
all down to
the
Israelis.
This
administration
will not
attack Iran.
This has
already been
decided. But
the
president is
really
preoccupied
with the
nuclear
threat
against
Israel and I
know he
doesn't
believe that
anything but
force will
deter Iran."
Translation:
The U.S.
will not be
the first to
attack Iran,
but it may
well join in
once the
Israelis get
things
started.
Laura Rozen,
writing in
Mother
Jones,
reports that
a parade of
Israeli
officials –
including
Israeli
Defense
Minister
Ehud Barak
and IDF
Chief of
Staff Gabi
Ashkenazi –
is due in
Washington
over the
next two
weeks to
impress upon
the
Americans
the urgent
necessity of
taking
military
action.
Rozen spoke
to neocon
superhawk
David
Wurmser,
former
adviser to
Vice
President
Dick Cheney
on Middle
Eastern
affairs, who
said:
"'Ultimately,
my gut tells
me that most
of the
administration
on most
levels would
push back
very hard,'
on Israeli
pressure on
Washington
to authorize
it to strike
Iran,
Wurmser
added. 'What
those in the
administration
who don't
want Israel
to act
probably
won't want
is for it to
be taken to
the highest
level. They
would always
be afraid
that [the
president]
might not be
so tough on
the
Israelis. If
the Israeli
[government]
really
intends to
do
something,
they would
go to the
highest
level
without a
lot of
people
knowing.'"
They may
have gotten
to the
president
already, as
Rozen
reports:
"A former
Pentagon
intelligence
official who
spoke with
Mother Jones
also alleges
that Meir
Dagan, the
chief of the
Israeli
intelligence
service, the
Mossad, held
secret
meetings
with
officials in
the White
House on
Wednesday.
Neither the
Israeli
embassy nor
National
Security
Council
would
comment on
whether
Dagan had
been at the
White
House."
This is
really the
crux of the
matter:
George W.
Bush.
Reckless,
more radical
than most of
his
advisers,
and now
dangerously
fixated on
his
"legacy," he
is more
determined
than ever to
leave his
lasting mark
on the
Middle East
and the
world – and,
given that
the
Constitution
has been
abandoned,
and a single
man can take
us to war
without the
consent of
Congress or
the people,
an
apocalyptic
departure
from office
seems more
likely than
not.
As in the
run-up to
the Iraq
war, the
prelude to
this far
greater
conflict is
marked by
attempts to
circumvent
what one
Bush
official
disdainfully
referred to
as "the
reality-based
community"
and
"stove-pipe"
the
Israelis'
analysis of
Iran
intelligence
into the
White House.
Our own
National
Intelligence
Estimate,
compiled by
the CIA and
a raft of
other
intelligence-gathering
outfits,
says that
the Iranians
abandoned
their
nuclear
weapons
program
years ago
and they
aren't
anywhere
near
weaponization
of their
nascent
nuclear
capabilities
at the
present
time. The
Israelis beg
to differ,
and they are
stating
their case
to Bush in
person –
whispering
in a
presidential
ear that has
been
unusually
receptive to
them in the
past.
Wurmser
gives the
odds of the
Israelis
attacking
Iran before
Bush leaves
office as
"slightly,
slightly
above
50-50." If
that
happens,
then it is
only a
matter of
time – a
very short
time –
before the
U.S. is
involved in
a
large-scale
conflict
with Iran
that will
send oil
prices
skyrocketing
past $300
per barrel
and bring
the world
economy to a
screeching
halt. Not
only that,
but war with
Tehran will
upend the
American
political
landscape
and give
John McCain
more than a
fighting
chance to
beat
frontrunner
Barack Obama.
In this
context, the
Israeli
pressure for
military
action can
be seen as a
direct
attempt to
influence an
American
election
that, so
far, is not
going to
their
liking.
Obama has
openly
stated that
he favors
negotiating
with the
Iranians,
which is
what the
Israelis
fear most.
How better
to eliminate
this
possibility
than by
tying
Obama's
hands the
moment he
gets into
office? With
the U.S.
already
engaged in
hostilities
with Iran,
negotiations
will be off
the table –
and the
Israelis
will be off
the hook.
The
Telegraph
reports that
Israeli
Prime
Minister
Ehud Olmert
recently
told one of
his closest
friends that
"in three
months' time
it will be a
different
Middle
East." Yes,
and also,
perhaps, a
very
different
America...
Justin Raimondo is the editorial director of Antiwar.com. He is the author of An Enemy of the State: The Life of Murray N. Rothbard (Prometheus Books, 2000). He is also the author of Reclaiming the American Right: The Lost Legacy of the Conservative Movement (with an Introduction by Patrick J. Buchanan), (Center for Libertarian Studies, 1993), and Into the Bosnian Quagmire: The Case Against U.S. Intervention in the Balkans (1996).
He is a contributing editor for The American Conservative, a Senior Fellow at the Randolph Bourne Institute, and an Adjunct Scholar with the Ludwig von Mises Institute, and writes frequently for Chronicles: A Magazine of American Culture.
