Big Brother
database
recording
all our
calls, texts
and e-mails
will 'ruin
British way
of life'
By
Matthew
Hickley
16/07/08 "Daily
Mail"
-- - Plans
for a
massive
database
snooping on
the entire
population
were
condemned
yesterday as
a ‘step too
far for the
British way
of life’.
In an
Orwellian
move, the
Home Office
is proposing
to detail
every phone
call,
e-mail, text
message,
internet
search and
online
purchase in
the fight
against
terrorism
and other
serious
crime.
But the
privacy
watchdog,
Information
Commissioner
Richard
Thomas,
warned that
the public’s
traditional
freedoms
were under
grave threat
from
creeping
state
surveillance.
Apart from
the
Government’s
inability to
hold data
securely, he
said the
proposals
raised
‘grave
questions’.
‘Do the
risks we
face provide
justification
for such a
scheme in
the first
place? Do we
want the
state to
have details
of more and
more aspects
of our
private
lives?
‘Whatever
the
benefits,
would such a
scheme
amount to
excessive
surveillance?
Would this
be a step
too far for
the British
way of
life?’
It is
thought the
scheme would
allow the
police or
MI5 to
access the
exact time
when a phone
call was
made, the
number
dialled, the
length of
the call
and, in the
case of
mobile
phones, the
location of
the handset
to within an
accuracy of
a few
hundred
yards.
Similarly
for e-mails,
it would
provide
details of
when they
were sent
and who the
recipients
were. Police
recovering a
suspect’s
computer
would then
be able to
trawl
through
hard-drive
records and
recover
particular
messages.
The content
of telephone
calls could
not be
recovered
unless they
were being
intercepted
at the time.
Mr Thomas’s
warnings
were backed
by privacy
campaigners,
who claimed
such Big
Brother
powers would
give
Government
agencies
unprecedented
abilities to
trawl
through
intimate
details of
ordinary
people’s
private
lives at
will.
He used the
launch of
his annual
report to
speak out
after
ministers
signalled
their
intentions
in their
programme of
legislation
earlier this
year,
describing
the new Bill
as
‘modifying
procedures
for
acquiring
communications
data’.
There are
fears that
the data
will be
shared with
foreign
governments
– such as
the
Americans
demanding
personal
details of
air
passengers –
accessed by
internet
hackers or
lost by
bungling
civil
servants.
Opponents
pointed out
that town
halls are
already
using
extraordinary
surveillance
powers under
the
controversial
Regulation
of
Investigatory
Powers Act
to
investigate
minor issues
such as
littering,
or checking
whether
parents are
abusing
school
catchment
area rules,
and they
could be
given access
to almost
unthinkable
levels of
personal
data under
the new
scheme.
Currently
police and
MI5 can
access
customer
records
stored by
telephone
companies,
but only
with a
warrant to
examine
individual
accounts.
Mr Thomas
said: ‘I am
absolutely
clear that
the targeted
and duly-authorised
interception
of the
communications
of suspects
can be
invaluable
in the fight
against
terrorism
and other
serious
crime.
‘But there
needs to be
the fullest
public
debate about
the
justification
for, and
implications
of, a
specially
created
database –
potentially
accessible
to a wide
range of law
enforcement
authorities
– holding
details of
everyone’s
telephone
and internet
communications.
'Do we
really want
the police,
security
services and
other organs
of the state
to have
access to
more and
more aspects
of our
private
lives?’
Opposition
MPs said the
Government’s
dismal
records on
safeguarding
private data
– most
notably the
loss of the
entire child
benefit
database
holding
millions of
people’s
financial
details –
showed it
was
incapable of
safeguarding
such a vast
volume of
information
safely, and
the scheme
should be
dropped
immediately.
An estimated
3billion
emails are
sent in
Britain
every day
and last
year
57billion
text
messages
were sent.
The Home
Office
yesterday
defended the
need to keep
its
surveillance
powers up to
date with
changing
internet
technology,
and said
full details
of the plans
would be
published
this year as
part of a
new
Communications
Data Bill.
Officials
said the
internet was
rapidly
revolutionising
communications
and it was
vital for
surveillance
powers to
keep up with
technology
in order to
fight
serious
crime and
terrorism.
DNA database
Britain's
crime-fighting
DNA database
was the
world’s
first, in
1995, and is
now the
world’s
largest.
Originally
samples were
taken from
those
arrested but
destroyed if
they were
not
convicted.
Today anyone
who is
arrested -
even if
innocent -
has DNA
taken
without
consent,
even if it
has nothing
to do with
the case. It
is added to
the
database,
and stays
there
forever. It
is virtually
impossible
to have it
removed.
Unsurprisingly,
new entries
are being
added at the
rate of more
than a
million a
year.
Number plate
checks
Police
forces use
hundreds of
Automatic
Number Plate
Recognition
cameras
across the
UK, some at
fixed sites
and some in
cars.
Computers
are able to
compare
numbers with
a national
database of
cars which
may be
stolen, or
whose owners
are wanted
for
questioning.
Each check
takes around
four
seconds.
Since last
year, the
Government
has been
developing a
central
database
which also
records the
details
every time a
car passes
an ANPR
camera,
anywhere in
Britain.
© 2008
Associated
Newspapers
Ltd
