Justice Only
For Darfur
Victims?
By Aijaz
Zaka Syed
18/07/08 "Arab
News"
--- - Few
issues have
exercised me
as much as
the conflict
in Darfur
has. In
fact, I have
the dubious
distinction
of being the
first
journalist
from the
Middle East
to break the
silence on
the genocide
in Sudan.
When I first
wrote about
Darfur way
back in 2006
criticizing
the
deafening
silence of
the Arab and
Muslim world
on the
genocide, it
was as
though I had
hit the
proverbial
hornets’
nest, with
lots of
brickbats —
and some
bouquets —
coming my
way. Not
surprisingly,
most of
those
brickbats
originated
in Sudan.
It was a
blistering
critique of
the
government
of Sudan and
its
incredibly
inept
handling of
the Darfur
conflict.
That
article, and
subsequent
ones,
censured the
Sudanese
leadership
for its
failure to
rein in the
bloodthirsty
militias and
warlords
prowling in
the region
who have
killed
hundreds of
thousands of
people from
a besieged
minority,
also Muslim,
and drove
millions
from their
homes.
Today, as
the
International
Criminal
Court at The
Hague
deliberates
on the fate
of Sudan
President
Omar Bashir
for
“genocide
and crimes
against
humanity,”
you would
think people
like me
would be
delighted.
Unfortunately,
this is not
the case.
It’s too
simplistic
and
dangerously
naïve to
assume that
President
Omar Bashir
planned and
perpetrated
the
atrocities
against the
people of
Darfur.
The Sudan
regime may
be guilty of
not doing
enough to
stop the
mass murder,
rape and
persecution
of the
ethnic
minority.
Sudan’s
leaders
could and
should have
done more to
alleviate
the
suffering in
the region
by working
with the UN
agencies and
aid groups.
By refusing
to allow in
the UN
peacekeepers
and relief
agencies in
initial
years of the
conflict,
the
authorities
exacerbated
the
humanitarian
crisis and
multiplied
the woes of
the local
population.
But it would
be unfair
and
unreasonable
to accuse
President
Bashir of
being the
architect of
the Darfur
catastrophe.
This is not
to doubt the
intentions
of Luis
Moreno-Ocampo,
the
high-profile
chief
prosecutor
of the World
Court. I
know he
means well.
The World
Court has
issued
warrants at
least in 10
cases
presented
before it by
Ocampo,
including
those for
the mass
murderers of
the Balkan
wars in the
last decade
of the last
century. But
is Ocampo on
an equally
firm footing
in this
case?
More to the
point,
notwithstanding
Ocampo’s
good
intentions,
the World
Court cannot
put Bashir
in the dock
because
Sudan as yet
does not
come under
the
jurisdiction
of the
court. The
African
country,
just like
Bush’s
America, is
not a member
of the ICC.
What is
more, there
is a feeling
that the
prosecution
of Bashir
could
actually end
up
aggravating
the
humanitarian
crisis in
Darfur.
This is no
defense of
the Sudan
leader. But
if we are
really
talking
accountability,
fair play,
justice and
equality
before law,
what about
dealing with
other
perpetrators
of crimes
against
humanity? I
respect ICC
chief
prosecutor
Ocampo for
his courage
to bring
justice to
the people
of Darfur.
But would he
or can he
bring
justice to
the people
of Iraq and
Afghanistan
too?
In case the
ICC official
has failed
to notice,
more people
have died in
Iraq and
Afghanistan
than those
claimed by
the conflict
in Sudan
over the
past five
years.
According to
the latest
figures
released by
the
Information
Clearing
House, an
anti-war
online
publication
based in the
US, the
number of
Iraqis
killed since
the US
invasion now
stands at
1,236,604.
That is more
than a
million
lives!
Trust me,
Monsieur
Ocampo, most
of those
killed in
Iraq had
been
innocent
too. And
while you
are
administering
justice,
could you
please also
remember the
people who
have been
waiting for
justice in
the holy
land for
nearly 70
years? They
call
themselves
Palestinians.
Someone
stole their
country many
years ago,
driving them
from their
ancient land
and homes.
And they
have been
waiting for
justice and
deliverance
ever since.
They die
every day
but refuse
to let their
free spirits
die. They
have lost
generations
and
generations
of the young
and old, men
and women to
this daily
war that is
their
existence.
They have
simply lost
count of how
many loved
ones they
have buried
over the
past seven
decades.
Can they
hope for
justice too,
Monsieur
Ocampo?
