Russia Takes
Control of
Turkmen
(World?) Gas
By M K
Bhadrakumar
30/07/08 "Asia
Times'
-- - From
the details
coming out
of Ashgabat
in
Turkmenistan
and Moscow
over the
weekend, it
is apparent
that the
great game
over Caspian
energy has
taken a
dramatic
turn. In the
geopolitics
of energy
security,
nothing like
this has
happened
before. The
United
States has
suffered a
huge defeat
in the race
for Caspian
gas. The
question now
is how much
longer
Washington
could afford
to keep Iran
out of the
energy
market.
Gazprom,
Russia's
energy
leviathan,
signed two
major
agreements
in Ashgabat
on Friday
outlining a
new scheme
for purchase
of Turkmen
gas. The
first one
elaborates
the price
formation
principles
that will be
guiding the
Russian gas
purchase
from
Turkmenistan
during the
next 20-year
period. The
second
agreement is
a unique
one, making
Gazprom the
donor for
local
Turkmen
energy
projects. In
essence, the
two
agreements
ensure that
Russia will
keep control
over Turkmen
gas exports.
The new
pricing
principle
lays out
that
starting
from next
year, Russia
has agreed
to pay to
Turkmenistan
a base gas
purchasing
price that
is a mix of
the average
wholesale
price in
Europe and
Ukraine. In
effect, as
compared to
the current
price of
US$140 per
thousand
cubic meters
of Turkmen
gas, from
2009 onward
Russia will
be paying
$225-295
under the
new formula.
This works
out to an
additional
annual
payment of
something
like $9.4
billion to
$12.4
billion. But
the
transition
to market
principles
of pricing
will take
place within
the
framework of
a long-term
contract
running up
to the year
2028.
The second
agreement
stipulates
that Gazprom
will finance
and build
gas
transportation
facilities
and develop
gas fields
in
Turkmenistan.
Experts have
estimated
that Gazprom
will finance
Turkmen
projects
costing $4-6
billion.
Gazprom
chief Alexei
Miller said,
"We have
reached
agreement
regarding
Gazprom
financing
and building
the new main
gas
pipelines
from the
east of the
country,
developing
gas fields
and boosting
the capacity
of the
Turkmen
sector of
the Caspian
gas pipeline
to 30
billion
cubic
meters."
Interestingly,
Gazprom will
provide
financing in
the form of
0% credits
for these
local
projects.
The net gain
for
Turkmenistan
is estimated
to be in the
region of
$240-480
million.
From all
appearance,
Gazprom,
which was
headed by
Russian
President
Dmitry
Medvedev for
eight years
from 2000 to
May 2008,
has taken an
audacious
initiative.
It could
only have
happened
thanks to a
strategic
decision
taken at the
highest
level in the
Kremlin. In
fact,
Medvedev had
traveled to
Ashgabat on
July 4-5 en
route to the
Group of
Eight summit
meeting in
Hokkaido,
Japan.
Curiously,
the
agreements
reached in
Ashgabat on
Friday are
unlikely to
enable
Gazprom to
make revenue
from
reselling
Turkmen gas.
Quite
possibly,
Gazprom may
now have to
concede
similar
terms to
Kazakhstan
and
Uzbekistan,
the two
other major
gas
producing
countries in
Central
Asia. In
other words,
plain
money-making
was not the
motivation
for Gazprom.
The Kremlin
has a grand
strategy.
Coincidence
or not,
Russian
Deputy Prime
Minister
Igor Sechin
traveled to
Beijing at
the weekend
to launch
with his
Chinese
counterpart,
Vice Premier
Wang Oishan,
an energy
initiative -
a so-called
"energy
negotiation
mechanism".
The first
round of
negotiations
within this
framework
took place
on Saturday
in Beijing.
There has
been an
inexplicable
media
blackout of
the event,
but Beijing
finally
decided to
break the
news. The
government-owned
China Daily
admitted on
Monday,
"Both China
and Russia
kept silent
on the
details of
the
consensus
they reached
on energy
cooperation
in the first
round of
their
negotiation
in Beijing
on the
weekend."
Without
getting into
details,
China Daily
merely took
note of the
talks as "a
good
beginning"
and
commented,
"It seems
that a shift
of Russia's
energy
export
policy is
under way.
Russia might
turn its
eyes from
the Western
countries to
the
Asia-Pacific
region ...
The
cooperation
in the
energy
sector is an
issue of
great
significance
for
Sino-Russian
relations
... the
political
and
geographic
closeness of
the two
countries
would put
their energy
cooperation
under a safe
umbrella and
make it a
win-win
deal.
China-Russia
ties are at
their best
times ...
The two
sides
settled
their
lingering
border
disputes,
held joint
military
exercises,
and enjoyed
rapidly
increasing
bilateral
trade."
It is
unclear
whether
Gazprom's
agreements
in Ashgabat
and Sechin's
talks in
Beijing were
inter-related.
Conceivably,
they
overlapped
in so far as
China had
signed a
long-term
agreement
with
Turkmenistan
whereby the
latter would
supply 30
billion
cubic meters
of gas to
China
annually for
the 30-year
period
starting
from 2009.
The
construction
work on the
gas pipeline
leading from
Turkmenistan
to China's
Xinjiang
Autonomous
region has
already
begun. China
had agreed
on the price
for Turkmen
gas at $195
per thousand
cubic
meters. Now,
the
agreement in
Ashgabat on
Friday puts
Gazprom in
the driving
seat for
handling all
of
Turkmenistan's
gas exports,
including to
China.
Russia and
China have a
heavy agenda
to discuss
in energy
cooperation
far beyond
the price of
Turkmen gas
supplies.
But suffice
it to say
that
Gazprom's
new stature
as the sole
buyer of
Turkmen gas
strengthens
Russia's
hands in
setting the
price in the
world gas
(and oil)
market. And
that has
implications
for China.
Moscow would
be keen to
ensure that
Russian and
Chinese
interests
are
harmonized
in Central
Asia.
Besides,
Russia is
taking a
renewed
interest in
the idea of
a "gas
cartel".
Medvedev
referred to
the idea
during the
visit of
Venezuelan
President
Hugo Chavez
to Moscow
last week.
The Russian
newspaper
Nezavisimaya
Gazeta
reported on
Friday that
"Moscow
finds the
idea of
coordination
of gas
production
and pricing
policy with
other gas
exporters to
be too
tempting to
abandon".
The daily
quoted
Miller as
saying,
"This forum
of gas
exporters
will set up
the global
gas balance.
It will give
answers to
the
questions
concerning
when, where
and how much
gas should
be
produced."
Until fairly
recently
Moscow was
sensitive
about the
European
Union's
opposition
to the idea
of a gas
cartel.
(Washington
has openly
warned that
it would
legislate
against
countries
that lined
up behind a
gas cartel).
But high gas
prices have
weakened the
European
Union's
negotiating
position.
The
agreements
with
Turkmenistan
further
consolidate
Russia's
control of
Central
Asia's gas
exports.
Gazprom
recently
offered to
buy all of
Azerbaijan's
gas at
European
prices. (Medvedev
visited Baku
on July
3-4.) Baku
will study
with keen
interest the
agreements
signed in
Ashgabat on
Friday. The
overall
implications
of these
Russian
moves are
very serious
for the US
and EU
campaign to
get the
Nabucco gas
pipeline
project
going.
Nabucco,
which would
run from
Turkey to
Austria via
Bulgaria,
Rumania and
Hungary, was
hoping to
tap Turkmen
gas by
linking
Turkmenistan
and
Azerbaijan
via a
pipeline
across the
Caspian Sea
that would
be connected
to the
pipeline
networks
through the
Caucasus to
Turkey
already
existing,
such as the
Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan
pipeline.
But with
access
denied to
Turkmen gas,
Nabucco's
viability
becomes
doubtful.
And, without
Nabucco, the
entire US
strategy of
reducing
Europe's
dependence
on Russian
energy
supplies
makes no
sense.
Therefore,
Washington
is faced
with
Hobson's
choice.
Friday's
agreements
in Ashgabat
mean that
Nabucco's
realization
will now
critically
depend on
gas supplies
from the
Middle East
- Iran, in
particular.
Turkey is
pursuing the
idea of Iran
supplying
gas to
Europe and
has offered
to mediate
in the
US-Iran
standoff.
The
geopolitics
of energy
makes
strange
bedfellows.
Russia will
be watching
with anxiety
the
Turkish-Iranian-US
tango. An
understanding
with Iran on
gas pricing,
production
and
market-sharing
is vital for
the success
of Russia's
overall gas
export
strategy.
But Tehran
visualizes
the Nabucco
as its
passport for
integration
with Europe.
Again,
Russia's
control of
Turkmen gas
cannot be to
Tehran's
liking.
Tehran had
keenly
pursed with
Ashgabat the
idea of
evacuation
of Turkmen
gas to the
world market
via Iranian
territory.
There must
be deep
frustration
in
Washington.
In sum,
Russia has
greatly
strengthened
its standing
as the
principal
gas supplier
to Europe.
It not only
controls
Central
Asia's gas
exports but
has ensured
that gas
from the
region
passes
across
Russia and
not through
the
alternative
trans-Caspian
pipelines
mooted by
the US and
EU. Also, a
defining
moment has
come. The
era of cheap
gas is
ending.
Other gas
exporters
will cite
the
precedent of
the price
for Turkmen
gas.
European
companies
cannot match
Gazprom's
muscle.
Azerbaijan
becomes a
test case.
Equally,
Russia
places
itself in a
commanding
position to
influence
the price of
gas in the
world
market. A
gas cartel
is surely in
the making.
The
geopolitical
implications
are simply
profound for
the US.
Moreover,
Russian oil
and gas
companies
are now
spreading
their wings
into Latin
America,
which has
been the
US's
traditional
backyard.
During
Chavez's
visit to
Moscow on
July 22,
three
Russian
energy
companies -
Gazprom,
LUKoil and
TNK-BP -
signed
agreements
with the
Venezuelan
state-owned
petroleum
company
PDVSA. They
will replace
the American
oil giants
ExxonMobil
and
ConocoPhillips
in
Venezuela.
At the
signing
ceremony,
Medvedev
said, "We
have not
only
approved
these
agreements
but have
also decided
to supervise
their
implementation."
Chavez
responded,
"I look
forward to
seeing all
of you in
Venezuela."
Ambassador M
K
Bhadrakumar
was a career
diplomat in
the Indian
Foreign
Service. His
assignments
included the
Soviet
Union, South
Korea, Sri
Lanka,
Germany,
Afghanistan,
Pakistan,
Uzbekistan,
Kuwait and
Turkey.
Copyright
2008 Asia
Times Online
(Holdings)
Ltd. All
rights
reserved.
