Presstitute and war pimp alert: Demonizing Pakistan
Pakistanis
Aided Kabul
Attack, U.S.
Officials
Say
By MARK
MAZZETTI and
ERIC SCHMITT
01/08/08
"New
York Times" --
WASHINGTON —
American
intelligence
agencies
have
concluded
that members
of
Pakistan’s
powerful spy
service
helped plan
the deadly
July 7
bombing of
India’s
embassy in
Kabul,
Afghanistan,
according to
United
States
government
officials.
The
conclusion
was based on
intercepted
communications
between
Pakistani
intelligence
officers and
militants
who carried
out the
attack, the
officials
said,
providing
the clearest
evidence to
date that
Pakistani
intelligence
officers are
actively
undermining
American
efforts to
combat
militants in
the region.
The American
officials
also said
there was
new
information
showing that
members of
the
Pakistani
intelligence
service were
increasingly
providing
militants
with details
about the
American
campaign
against
them, in
some cases
allowing
militants to
avoid
American
missile
strikes in
Pakistan’s
tribal
areas.
Concerns
about the
role played
by Pakistani
intelligence
not only has
strained
relations
between the
United
States and
Pakistan, a
longtime
ally, but
also has
fanned
tensions
between
Pakistan and
its
archrival,
India.
Within days
of the
bombings,
Indian
officials
accused the
Directorate
of
Inter-Services
Intelligence,
or ISI, of
helping to
orchestrate
the attack
in Kabul,
which killed
54,
including an
Indian
defense
attaché.
This week,
Pakistani
troops
clashed with
Indian
forces in
the
contested
region of
Kashmir,
threatening
to fray an
uneasy
cease-fire
that has
held since
November
2003.
The New York
Times
reported
this week
that a top
Central
Intelligence
Agency
official
traveled to
Pakistan
this month
to confront
senior
Pakistani
officials
with
information
about
support
provided by
members of
the ISI to
militant
groups. It
had not been
known that
American
intelligence
agencies
concluded
that
elements of
Pakistani
intelligence
provided
direct
support for
the attack
in Kabul.
American
officials
said that
the
communications
were
intercepted
before the
July 7
bombing, and
that the
C.I.A.
emissary,
Stephen R.
Kappes, the
agency’s
deputy
director,
had been
ordered to
Islamabad,
Pakistan’s
capital,
even before
the attack.
The
intercepts
were not
detailed
enough to
warn of any
specific
attack.
The
government
officials
were guarded
in
describing
the new
evidence and
would not
say
specifically
what kind of
assistance
the ISI
officers
provided to
the
militants.
They said
that the ISI
officers had
not been
renegades,
indicating
that their
actions
might have
been
authorized
by
superiors.
“It
confirmed
some
suspicions
that I think
were widely
held,” one
State
Department
official
with
knowledge of
Afghanistan
issues said
of the
intercepted
communications.
“It was sort
of this
‘aha’
moment.
There was a
sense that
there was
finally
direct
proof.”
The
information
linking the
ISI to the
bombing of
the Indian
Embassy was
described in
interviews
by several
American
officials
with
knowledge of
the
intelligence.
Some of the
officials
expressed
anger that
elements of
Pakistan’s
government
seemed to be
directly
aiding
violence in
Afghanistan
that had
included
attacks on
American
troops.
Some
American
officials
have begun
to suggest
that
Pakistan is
no longer a
fully
reliable
American
partner and
to advocate
some
unilateral
American
action
against
militants
based in the
tribal
areas.
The ISI has
long
maintained
ties to
militant
groups in
the tribal
areas, in
part to
court allies
it can use
to contain
Afghanistan’s
power. In
recent
years,
Pakistan’s
government
has also
been
concerned
about
India’s
growing
influence
inside
Afghanistan,
including
New Delhi’s
close ties
to the
government
of Hamid
Karzai, the
Afghan
president.
American
officials
say they
believe that
the embassy
attack was
probably
carried out
by members
of a network
led by
Maulavi
Jalaluddin
Haqqani,
whose
alliance
with Al
Qaeda and
its
affiliates
has allowed
the
terrorist
network to
rebuild in
the tribal
areas.
American and
Pakistani
officials
have now
acknowledged
that
President
Bush on
Monday
confronted
Pakistan’s
prime
minister,
Yousaf Raza
Gilani,
about the
divided
loyalties of
the ISI.
Pakistan’s
defense
minister,
Chaudhry
Ahmed
Mukhtar,
told a
Pakistani
television
network on
Wednesday
that Mr.
Bush asked
senior
Pakistani
officials
this week, “
‘Who is in
control of
ISI?’ ” and
asked about
leaked
information
that tipped
militants to
surveillance
efforts by
Western
intelligence
services.
Pakistan’s
new civilian
government
is wrestling
with these
very issues,
and there is
concern in
Washington
that the
civilian
leaders will
be unable to
end a
longstanding
relationship
between
members of
the ISI and
militants
associated
with Al
Qaeda.
Spokesmen
for the
White House
and the
C.I.A.
declined to
comment for
this
article.
Pakistan’s
ambassador
to the
United
States,
Husain
Haqqani, did
not return a
call seeking
comment.
Further
underscoring
the tension
between
Pakistan and
its Western
allies,
Britain’s
senior
military
officer said
in
Washington
on Thursday
that an
American and
British
program to
help train
Pakistan’s
Frontier
Corps in the
tribal areas
had been
delayed
while
Pakistan’s
military and
civilian
officials
sorted out
details
about the
program’s
goals.
Britain and
the United
States had
each offered
to send
about two
dozen
military
trainers to
Pakistan
later this
summer to
train
Pakistani
Army
officers who
in turn
would
instruct the
Frontier
Corps
paramilitary
forces.
But the
British
officer, Air
Chief
Marshal Sir
Jock
Stirrup,
said the
program had
been
temporarily
delayed. “We
don’t yet
have a firm
start date,”
he told a
small group
of
reporters.
“We’re ready
to go.”
The bombing
of the
Indian
Embassy
helped to
set off a
new
deterioration
in relations
between
India and
Pakistan.
This week,
Indian and
Pakistani
soldiers
fired at
each other
across the
Kashmir
frontier for
more than 12
hours
overnight
Monday, in
what the
Indian Army
called the
most serious
violation of
a
five-year-old
cease-fire
agreement.
The
nightlong
battle came
after one
Indian
soldier and
four
Pakistanis
were killed
along the
border
between
sections of
Kashmir that
are
controlled
by India and
by Pakistan.
Indian
officials
say they are
equally
worried
about what
is happening
on the
Pakistan-Afghanistan
border
because they
say the
insurgents
who are
facing off
with India
in Kashmir
and those
who target
Afghanistan
are related
and can keep
both borders
burning at
the same
time.
India and
Afghanistan
share close
political,
cultural and
economic
ties, and
India
maintains an
active
intelligence
network in
Afghanistan,
all of which
has drawn
suspicion
from
Pakistani
officials.
When asked
Thursday
about
whether the
ISI and
Pakistani
military
remained
loyal to the
country’s
civilian
government,
Adm. Mike
Mullen, the
chairman of
the Joint
Chiefs of
Staff,
sidestepped
the
question.
“That’s
probably
something
the
government
of Pakistan
ought to
speak to,”
Admiral
Mullen told
reporters at
the
Pentagon.
Jalaluddin
Haqqani, the
militia
commander,
battled
Soviet
troops
during the
1980s and
has had a
long and
complicated
relationship
with the
C.I.A. He
was among a
group of
fighters who
received
arms and
millions of
dollars from
the C.I.A.
during that
period, but
his
allegiance
with Osama
bin Laden
and Al Qaeda
during the
following
decade led
the United
States to
sever the
relationship.
Mr. Haqqani
and his sons
now run a
network that
Western
intelligence
services say
they believe
is
responsible
for a
campaign of
violence
throughout
Afghanistan,
including
the Indian
Embassy
bombing and
an attack on
the Serena
Hotel in
Kabul
earlier this
year.
David Rohde
contributed
reporting
from New
York, and
Somini
Sengupta
from New
Delhi.
