The Financial Times and
the “Self-Confessed Mastermind of 9/11”
By James Petras
28/08/08 "ICH" -- -
In recent days there is mounting evidence of the advance of
totalitarianism in the political and media mainstream. The
entire Western world, led by the United States, has embraced a
Georgian regime, which invaded South Ossetia totally demolishing
its capital city of 50,000 residents, assassinated 1500 men,
women and children and dozens of Russian peace keepers. The US
has mobilized a naval and air armada off the Iranian coast,
prepared to annihilate a country of 70 million people. The
New York Times published an essay by a prominent Israeli
historian, which advocates the nuclear incineration of Iran. All
the major mass media have mounted a systematic propaganda
campaign against China, supporting each and every terrorist and
separatist group, and whipping up public opinion in favor of
launching a New Cold War. There is little doubt that this new
wave of imperial aggression and bellicose rhetoric is meant to
deflect domestic discontent and distract public opinion from the
deepening economic crises.
The Financial
Times (FT), once the liberal, enlightened voice of the
financial elite (in contrast to the aggressively
neo-conservative Wall Street Journal) has yielded to the
totalitarian-militarist temptation. The feature article of the
weekend supplement of August 16/17, 2008 – “The Face of 9/11” –
embraces the forced confession of a 9/11 suspect elicited
through 5 years of hideous torture in the confines of secret
prisons. To make their case, the FT published a half-page
blow-up photo first circulated by former CIA director George
Tenet, which presents a bound, disheveled, dazed, hairy ape-like
prisoner. The text of the writer, one Demetri Sevastopulo,
admits as much: The FT owns up to being a propaganda vehicle for
a CIA program to discredit the suspect while he stands trial
based on confessions obtained through torture.
From beginning to
end, the article categorically states that the principle
defendant, Khalet Sheikh Mohammed, is the “self-confessed
mastermind of the September 11 attacks on the US.” The first
half of the article is full of trivia, designed to provide a
human-interest feel to the courtroom and the proceedings – a
bizarre mixture discussing Khaled’s nose to the size of the
courtroom.
The central point of
departure for the FT’s conviction of the suspect is Khaled’s
confession, his ‘desire for martyrdom’, his assumption of
his own defense and his reciting the Koran. The crucial piece of
the Government’s case is Khaled’s confession. All the
other ‘evidence’ was circumstantial, hearsay and based on
inferences derived from Khaled’s attendance at overseas
meetings.
The FT’s principle
source of information, an anonymous informant “familiar with the
CIA interrogation program” states categorically two crucial
facts: (1) How little the CIA had known about him before his
arrest (my emphasis) and (2) that Khaled held out longer
than the others.
In other words, the
CIA’s only real evidence was extracted by torture (the CIA
admitted to ‘water boarding’ – an infamous torture technique
inducing near death from drowning). The fact that Khaled
repeatedly denied the accusations and that he only confessed
after 5 years of torture in secret prisons renders the entire
prosecution a case study in totalitarian jurisprudence. Having
been subjected to unspeakable torture by US judicial
investigators, facing accusations based on a confession
extracted through torture, it is no wonder that Khaled refused a
court appointed military lawyer – a lawyer who is part of a
system of secret prisons, torture and ‘show trials’. Rather than
portray Khaled as a fanatic seeking martyrdom for rejecting a
lawyer, we must recognize that he is completely in his right
mind to at least preserve the limited space and time allocated
to him to state his beliefs and to relate his willingness to die
for those beliefs. Confessions extracted from torture,
have no validity in any court, especially after 5 years of
solitary confinement. What the FT calls “the super terrorist”
based on his stated “desire for martyrdom” is the admission of
an individual who has suffered beyond human endurance and looks
to death to end his horrible sub-human existence.
The FT’s embrace of
the CIA and military’s coerced evidence and therefore their use
of torture, puts them squarely in the camp of the totalitarian
state. The right-turn of the FT mirrors the European turn toward
US military confrontation with Russia, and the military build-up
in Poland, the Czech Republic, Kosovo, Iraq and Georgia. The FT
by legitimizing torture has opened the door to making
totalitarian judicial practices, arbitrary arrests, secret
prisons, prolonged solitary confinement, torture, show trials
and cover-up feature stories part of normal Western political
life. Genteel British fascism is no less ugly than its blustery
US version.
James Petras’ latest
book:
Zionism, Militarism
and the Decline of US Power,
(Clarity Press 2008).