|
Clash in the
Caucasus:
Rolling Back The "Unipolar"
World
By Mike Whitney
10/09/08 "ICH" -- -
For the past week, Dick Cheney has been traveling through the
Caucasus trying to drum up support for punitive action against
Russia for its role in the recent fighting in South Ossetia. The
Vice President vowed that the Moscow's action "will not go
unanswered". Cheney is determined to establish the United States
as the regional "cop on the beat", taking charge of all security
operations through it's cat's paw, Nato. Neither the Kremlin nor
the EU are paying much attention to Cheney's fulminations. The
negotiations for the security arrangements and the withdrawal of
Russian troops are being conducted without US involvement.
On September 9, under the revolving leadership of French
President Nicolas Sarkozy, the EU hammered out a deal with
Russian President Dmitri Medvedev to replace Russian soldiers in
South Ossetia with 200 EU observers who are scheduled to arrive
by October 1. In exchange, Georgia agreed to Russia's demands
not to use force against the two breakaway republics, Abkahzia
and South Ossetia. Medvedev's unilateral announcement that
Russia would recognize both republics as "independent", did not
derail the EU peace process. Rather, both sides focused on the
withdrawal of Russia troops and seem reasonably satisfied with
the 6-point agreement.
Russia has not only scored an important diplomatic victory; it
has driven a wedge between Europe and the United States. The
reckless behavior of Georgia's President Mikhail Saakashvili has
given the Bush administration a black eye and put Nato
membership out of reach for the foreseeable future. Saakashvili
invaded South Ossetia last month; destroyed much of the capital,
Tskhinvali, and killed an estimated 1,500 civilians before his
troops were routed by the Russian army. Among the dead were
Russian citizens and peacekeepers. Moscow has cut off all
relations with Tblisi and President Medvedev has called
Saakashvili a "political corpse". The Kremlin now regards its
neighbor to the south as an enemy.
Cheney's week-long trip to the Caucasus was organized with two
objectives in mind; to isolate Russia from its allies in Europe
and speed up Nato membership for Georgia and Ukraine. He has
failed on both counts. The ashen-faced Veep flew from Baku to
Kiev, from Kiev to Tiblisi, from Tiblisi to Cernobbio; rattling
his saber and railing in typical Cold War style to anyone who
would listen, but his efforts amounted to nothing. No one in
Europe wants a confrontation with Russia or another decades-long
year nuclear standoff. Besides, Putin has spent the last eight
years building partnerships and creating an expansive energy
network that provides vast amounts of oil and natural gas to
European homes and industries. Europe depends on Russia now and
wants to maintain friendly relations.
It's different for Cheney who has been seething on the
sidelines--bogged down in the Iraqi quagmire--while Moscow has
gotten stronger and more independent from its massive energy
windfall. Now Russia can fend for itself and has no interest in
becoming just another cog in America's imperial machine. When
Putin articulated Russia's determination to defend its national
sovereignty in Munich nearly two years ago, saying that he
rejected the idea of a "unipolar" world, the Council on Foreign
Relations and other elite think tanks put Russia on the
America's "enemies list" more or less acknowledging that the
Kremlin would resist further integration into the so called
"international community". (aka-American-led, dollar-based
system)
Last week, newly-elected Russian President Dmitry Medvedev
reiterated the Putin Doctrine word for word as it was originally
stated in Munich:
"The world must be multi-polar. Single polarity is unacceptable.
Russia cannot accept a world order, in which any decisions will
be made by a sole nation, even such a serious one as the United
States. Such a world order will be unstable and fraught with
conflicts.”
Medvedev has drawn a line in the sand posing a direct challenge
to the America's continued dominance in global security. The
advancing Russian army has delivered a stinging defeat to the
neocon's imperial ambitions in Eurasia. It is possible that the
fighting in South Ossetia will eventually be seen as a tipping
point for US adventurism in the region.
Russia's ties with Europe threaten to shatter the increasingly
fragile Atlantic Alliance which is lashed together by G-7
banking cartel. If Europe sees a continuation of the same
belligerent Bush unilateralism under the next US president, the
popular backlash in Europe is likely to sever the Alliance once
and for all plunging the United States into forced isolation.
Reasonable people should want to avoid that possibility.
Cheney's Caucasus gambit is a desperate attempt to stir up
trouble while making a last ditch effort for the oil and natural
gas of the resource-rich Caspian Basin. So far, he and his
colleagues in Big Oil have nothing to show for their 20 years of
labor except a few under-performing puppets in Ukraine and
Georgia. The whole plan has flopped leaving Cheney with another
failure on his resume. Just this week, there was more news of
Russia's progress in the Central Asia energy sweepstakes in an
article by Paul Goble titled "Moscow Wins a Major Victory on
Pipelines":
"With Iran’s declaration that it opposes the construction of any
undersea pipelines in the Caspian on "ecological grounds" and
thus will block any delimitation of the seabed that allows for
them and Baku’s decision not to back the West’s push NABUCCO
project, Moscow can claim its first major political victory from
its invasion of Georgia.
These actions mean that the Russian government will now have
full and uncontested control over pipelines between the Caspian
basin and the West which pass through Russian territory and will
be able either directly or through its clients like the PKK to
disrupt the only routes such as Baku-Tbilisi-Ceylon that bypass
the Russian Federation."
If Cheney is serious about catching-up to Russia, he'll have to
act fast. Unfortunately, Cheney is more disliked in Central Asia
than he is in the USA where his public approval ratings have
been well below sea-level for the last 4 years. In fact, when
Cheney arrived in Azerbaijan, neither President Ilkham Aliyev
nor Prime Minister, Artur Rasizade, even bothered to meet him at
the airport. Politicians everywhere know that its is political
suicide to even be seen with him.
Aleksandr Pikaev, an analyst from the Institute for World
Economy and International Relations, noted that Cheney's
unpopularity makes diplomacy virtually impossible. Pikaev said,
“ If the Bush Administration really wanted to consolidate the
international community behind the U.S. in criticizing Russia, I
think they should have found somebody else, not Mr Cheney." But
then, no one in the Bush administration cares what anyone else
thinks anyway; so the point is moot.
Cheney's trip had nothing to do with resolving differences
between Tbilisi and Moscow. His real goal was to secure a larger
share of the region's dwindling oil supplies before he leaves
office. As Linda Heard points out in her article "Driving Russia
into Enemy's Arms", the petrocarbon war is being lost in
stunning fashion:
"Moscow has clinched a new pipeline that will carry natural gas
from Turkmenistan to Russia and signed a contract that will give
it virtual control over Turkmenistan’s gas exports...Russia has
also put out feelers for the establishment of a global gas
cartel, an idea that it has discussed with Venezuela, and which
is certain to put cartel members on a collision course with the
White House. Venezuela has also invited three prominent Russian
companies to take over from their American counterparts,
ExxonMobil and Conoco Philips. Further, according to China
Daily, it has agreed with Beijing on an energy initiative that
would involve Russian oil and gas heading away from Europe
toward Asia."
Washington has been out maneuvered on every front by Russian
businessmen who have learned to use the free market more
effectively than their teachers in the US.
Bad Blood in Azerbaijan
According to Russia Today: "The Kommersant newspaper reports
that Cheney was very annoyed by the results of the meeting with
President Aliyev and even refused to attend a ceremonial supper
in his own honor." President Aliyev has suggested "that Baku is
going to play a waiting game concerning the Nabucco gas
pipeline," which is designed to bypass Russia. Aliyev wisely
wants to avoid any confrontation with the Kremlin.
Indeed, who can blame Aliyev? Anyone can see that Washington's
star is waning. Political leaders everywhere are simply nodding
politely and and waiting to see whether November's presidential
election will restore a bit of sanity to the White House. Until
then, everyone is laying low. It is unlikely that anyone will
answer Cheney's call to pick a fight with Moscow.
The Vice President has dropped all pretense that his trip has
anything to do with the fictional "war on terror". He said that
his aim is to "develop additional routes for energy exports to
promote energy security, which is becoming an 'increasingly
urgent' issue. We seek greater stability and security and
cooperation in this vital region of the world," Cheney told
reporters in Baku. He also met with representatives from BP and
Chevron, two oil giants involved involved in the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan
pipeline that pumps 1 million barrels of crude per day to world
markets from the Caspian. It's all about oil.
In the second leg of his trip, Cheney headed off for Georgia
where the Regnum web site reports:
"Kommersant cites sources in the State Chancellery of Georgia
who said that closed negotiations between Mikhail Saakashvili
and Dick Cheney in Tbilisi also had not gone smoothly. The sides
mainly discussed security of existing pipelines laid through the
Georgian territory round Russia, and the Nabucco pipeline
project. Dick Cheney made it clear that the USA were ready to
maintain security of these pipelines, however, by merely
political means, so Georgia would not receive US military aid at
the moment."
Trouble in Kiev
Cheney's trip was plagued by gaffes and miscues; one-part
political kabuki, one-part Vaudeville. He arrived in Kiev just
hours after Ukraine's pro-west coalition collapsed, plunging the
country into political chaos that could foreshadow an end to
US-Ukraine alliance. The political progress the Bush
administration felt they had made by fomenting the so called
"Orange Revolution", now hangs by a thread. Popular sentiment is
increasingly supportive of Moscow over Washington.
According to the Financial Times:
"President Viktor Yushchenko threatened to dissolve parliament
and call snap elections unless a new coalition can be formed,
blaming the crisis on supporters of Yulia Tymoshenko, his
firebrand prime minister....While Mr Yushchenko and Ms
Tymoshenko... have engaged in a bitter personal power struggle
that has persistently handicapped the government. ...Mr
Yushchenko accused Ms Tymoshenko's followers of plotting an "anticonstitutional
coup" by voting in tandem with the opposition Communist and
Moscow-leaning Regions parties in favor of legislation to cut
the president's authority." (Financial Times)
Russia's friends in Ukraine have thrown a spanner in Cheney's
plans for Nato membership and further integration into the EU.
This is a major setback for Cheney and his friends at the
far-right Washington think tanks who believed they were well on
their way to encircling Russia and achieving their territorial
ambitions. Ukraine will not be joining Nato anytime soon.
The Bush administration's aggressive lobbying hasn't persuaded
any of the main players in the EU to support punitive measures
or sanctions against Russia. The EU prefers diplomacy over
belligerence. As a result, Cheney has become increasingly
irrelevant; a blustery sideshow that everyone ignores except the
western media. As for the EU, there's simply no interest in
provoking Russia and risking the cutting off cutting off vital
resources to energy-dependent European countries. Common sense
has prevailed over Bush's "freedom agenda".
Cheney delivered his most pointed remarks about the recent
conflict in South Ossetia at a global security conference in
Cernobbio, Italy where he ended his trip. He said:
"Our principles are being tested anew. We must meet those tests
with candor and resolve and, above all, with unity. Russia has a
choice to make, and we in the trans-Atlantic alliance have
responsibilities. They (Russia) cannot presume to gather up all
the benefits of commerce, consultation and global prestige,
while engaging in brute force, threats or other forms of
intimidation against sovereign countries...No part of this
continent should leave itself vulnerable to a single country's
efforts to corner supplies or control the distribution system."
It is understandable that Cheney would be upset over Moscow's
success in securing crucial hydrocarbons and pipeline corridors
via the free market while the US has languished in Iraq and
Afghanistan with nothing to show for its efforts except one
million dead Iraqis, 4 million refugees, and a legacy of
disgrace. But, in truth, Cheney's frustration can be summarized
in two words: Sour grapes. He's just a poor loser.
THE MEDVEDEV DOCTRINE?
US foreign policy elites have long dreamed of integrating
Central Asia into the western economic and security paradigm.
Geopolitical strategist and former national security advisor,
Zbigniew Brzezinski, summarized it like this in an article in
Foreign Affairs more than a decade ago:
"Eurasia is the world’s axial supercontinent. A power that
dominated Eurasia would exercise decisive influence over two of
the world’s three most economically productive regions, Western
Europe and East Asia. A glance at the map also suggests that a
country dominant in Eurasia would almost automatically control
the Middle East and Africa . . . What happens with the
distribution of power on the Eurasian landmass will be of
decisive importance to America’s global primacy and historical
legacy."
A resurgent Russia--flush with the wealth derived from its vast
oil and natural gas supplies--has become a stumbling block for
US regional aspirations. Last month's clash with Washington's
"proxy" army in Georgia dispelled any illusion among Kremlin
powerbrokers that the Bush administration can be dealt with
rationally or via normal diplomatic channels. Cheney's
incendiary rhetoric just further underscores this point. That's
why Russia is preparing for the worst. Medvedev is strengthening
ties with the EU, the Central Asian countries (SCO), the BRIC
countries (Brazil, India, China) and has also deployed the
Russian fleet to the Mediterranean and off the coast of
Venezuela for joint-maneuvers.
In a recent press conference, President Medvedev announced the
five fundamental principles to which his government would
strictly adhere. Third on the list was "the protection of life
and dignity of Russian citizens no matter where they live”.
"There isn’t a single country in the world that would tolerate
its citizens and peacekeepers being killed," Medvedev said.
Russian citizens and peacekeepers were killed by a proxy army
that was trained and advised by "US special forces commandos".
So far, no one has been held accountable, but Medvedev and Putin
know who is to blame. Putin even suggested that the invasion was
planned as a way to improve the chances of one of the
presidential candidates to win the election.(McCain) Regardless
of the reason, when one country demonstrates that it is willing
to kill the citizens and soldiers of another country to achieve
its geopolitical objectives; that's when friendship ends and
attitudes harden.
The events in South Ossetia will play a central role in shaping
Russian foreign policy for years to come. The battle-lines have
been drawn, the fleet has been deployed, and the armies are
being moved into place. Russia does not want war, but it will be
ready if one breaks out.
Click on
"comments" below to read or post comments
Comment
Guidelines
Be succinct, constructive and
relevant to the story.
We encourage engaging, diverse and meaningful commentary.
Do not include personal information such as names, addresses,
phone numbers and emails. Comments falling outside our
guidelines – those including personal attacks and profanity –
are not permitted.
See our complete
Comment
Policy and use this link
to notify us if you have concerns about a
comment. We’ll promptly
review and remove any inappropriate postings.
Send Page To a Friend
In
accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this
material is distributed without profit to those
who have expressed a prior interest in receiving
the included information for research and
educational purposes. Information Clearing House
has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator
of this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)
|