Bank of America,
Merrill Bailout Disguised as Buyout?
By: Mike Stathis
09/16/09 "Market
Oracle" --
15/09/08 --Bank of America's buyout of Merrill Lynch seemed laughable to
me - that is until I realized the full picture. With a $50
billion all-stock deal valued at $29 per share, at first glance
it might appear that Bank of America doesn't stand to lose much
considering its stock is at least 50% overvalued by my analysis.
However, even at an adjusted price of $25 billion, Bank of
America will be responsible for absorbing all of Merrill's
losses. Good luck. But wait. They don't need luck, they have the
Fed.
I could care less about Merrill's 49% stake in Blackrock. No
financial institution is infallible under these conditions and
only an idiot would rush in to buy Merrill at $50 billion. They
are on the hook for a huge amount of mortgage securities. And
their brokerage unit has been fighting a massive decline for
years. In fact, I expected them to eventually sell it off.
While I can guarantee you all bank CEOs are lost in the
woods, Bank of America's CEO, Kenneth Lewis can't be that
stupid. Think about it. Lewis already committed to a buyout of
troubled Countrywide well before he realized how bad things
would get. How much blind risk can Bank of America handle? A lot
if they are given a blank check by the Fed. And the fact is that
they have been, along with the rest of the banking cartel. I'm
quite confident Lewis was approached by the Fed and U.S.
Treasury with promises of extra assistance, if needed, in
exchange for buying Merrill. That is precisely why the bank
offered a 70% premium for the struggling firm. Think about it.
Merrill was on its way to single digits so why not wait? Better
yet, why offer a 70% premium to its Friday closing price? This
is the worst banking crisis in U.S. history and they're offering
70% premiums?
It appears as if we are witnessing government bailouts using
taxpayer money that are being deceitfully disguised as buyouts.
Not just with the Merrill buyout but also this newly established
$70 billion emergency bank fund, set aside to help out banks
with future problems. Where do you think this money is coming
from? The banks certainly don't have it. It is coming indirectly
either from the Fed or the U.S. Treasury. That is precisely why
the Fed just opened up the types of securities for Schedule 2
auctions that can be used as collateral for borrowing from the
Term Securities Lending Facility. Now all investment-grade
securities can be pledged. In addition, the amounts auctioned
have been increased by $25 billion to $200 billion. The problem
is that what may be investment-grade today could easily become
junk next week. In fact, as I have stated in the past, we are
going to see a huge junk bond market soon. Already, corporate
defaults are soaring.
You see, the banking cartel – the guys that own the Federal
Reserve – have been given a blank check and will make it through
this crisis. JP Morgan Chase is already dealing with Bear
Stearns so now it was time to ask Bank of America to take over
Merrill. And while the money might not be coming directly from
the U.S. Treasury, what's the difference? Anyone holding dollars
is getting screwed because all of this extra printing is
destroying the currency.
I recall reading Friday an analyst form Citigroup stating
Merrill's “liquidity position is strong and that exposure to
volatile businesses is lower relative to its peers.”
http://news.moneycentral.msn.com/ticker/article.asp..
If that's the case, then it looks like all the banks are on
the verge of complete failure. When are these analysts going to
stop with their lies? By now, we should come to expect the
Friday close of the next bank failure.
Now, let me show you an excerpt from a June 25, 2008 article
I wrote
http://seekingalpha.com/article/82623..I want you to focus
on the section titled, “A Final Word of Caution”….
“Those of you looking to make easy money
in the financials like E-Trade (ETFC) need to think again. The
risk is too high right now. I find it amazing how so many who
have taken a long position in ETFC cite the company's impressive
book value as some sign of value or financial strength.
Understand that book value is used in the event of liquidation
of assets in bankruptcy and therefore usually has no impact for
common stock holders. In addition, book values of financials are
meaningless since the banks have overvalued their debt. Finally,
book values typically have no way of fully accounting for the
type of massive leverage the banks have built. If you were not
aware of these basic facts, you really need to sit this one out,
save your cash and wait for the next bull market, when nearly
everyone does well.
Even Citibank (C) has considerable downside from here, as
does Bank of America (BAC). Over the past year, I have made many
recommendations to short the financials. Earlier in the year, my
attention was focused on Lehman Brothers (LEH) and American
International Group (AIG). The story on these guys is far from
over but I would wait for a rally before going short again. The
next short to consider will be Merrill Lynch (MER). When MBIA (MBI)
and Ambac (ABK) get another downgrade, MER will be in deep
trouble due to their large exposure to insured mortgage debt.
That said, you might be wondering why MER is already near a year
low. It's quite simple. All that I have told you about Merrill's
risks is widely known. But that does not mean it can't go lower.
However, unless you are very experienced with shorting, you need
to stay away from this strategy.
Will there ever be a time to pick up the financials? I doubt
I will bother to pick up any of these (other than for short-term
trading) even when I sense the bottom has been reached because
the climb back up is going to be very slow and small. The
dilution that has and will continue to occur will crush earnings
for many years.”
So which major bank will be next to go under? Whatever bank
that ends up being, Citigroup is certainly in no shape to help
out. Even with the Fed's printing presses they are going to
struggle to survive. Most likely, Citi will sell off a few of
its businesses before it's all over. So the question is, which
member of the banking cartel will be asked to step in and buy
Washington Mutual.
By Mike Stathis
mike@apexva.com
Copyright © 2008. All Rights Reserved. Mike Stathis.
Mike Stathis is the Managing Principal of Apex Venture Advisors
, a business and investment intelligence firm serving the needs
of venture firms, corporations and hedge funds on a variety of
projects. Mike's work in the private markets includes valuation
analysis, deal structuring, and business strategy. In the public
markets he has assisted hedge funds with investment strategy,
valuation analysis, market forecasting, risk management, and
distressed securities analysis. Prior to Apex Advisors, Mike
worked at UBS and Bear Stearns, focusing on asset management and
merchant banking.
The accuracy of his predictions and insights detailed in the
2006 release of America's Financial Apocalypse and Cashing in on
the Real Estate Bubble have positioned him as one of America's
most insightful and creative financial minds. These books serve
as proof that he remains well ahead of the curve, as he
continues to position his clients with a unique competitive
advantage. His first book, The Startup Company Bible for
Entrepreneurs has become required reading for high-tech
entrepreneurs, and is used in several business schools as a
required text for completion of the MBA program.
Click on
"comments" below to read or post comments
Comment
Guidelines
Be succinct, constructive and
relevant to the story.
We encourage engaging, diverse and meaningful commentary.
Do not include personal information such as names, addresses,
phone numbers and emails. Comments falling outside our
guidelines – those including personal attacks and profanity –
are not permitted.
See our complete
Comment
Policy and use this link
to notify us if you have concerns about a
comment. We’ll promptly
review and remove any inappropriate postings.
Send Page To a Friend
In
accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this
material is distributed without profit to those
who have expressed a prior interest in receiving
the included information for research and
educational purposes. Information Clearing House
has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator
of this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)
|