Does the
bailout pass
the smell
test?
By Paul
Craig
Roberts
14/10/08
"Information
Clearinghouse" - --
The
explanation
that has
been given
for the
financial
crisis does
not match up
with the
solution
that has
been
devised.
Moreover,
the windows
into the
crisis
offered by
the
authorities
are opaque
rather than
transparent.
The only
clarity we
have is that
the crisis
is resulting
in financial
concentration
and that the
bailout
constitutes
a massive
raid by
financial
crooks on
both
taxpayers
and central
bank
reserves in
the US and
Europe.
The public
monies that
are being
directed to
private
financial
institutions
are huge.
According to
news
reports,
Germany is
devoting
$540 billion
to shoring
up German
banks,
England is
devoting $73
billion, and
France has
pledged over
$400
billion. The
US now has
four
separate
bailouts
underway,
$800 billion
for banks,
$200 billion
for Fannie
Mae and
Freddie Mac,
$85 billion
for the
insurer AIG,
and $25
billion for
the US auto
industry.
These
figures add
to more than
$2.1
trillion.
Some of
these public
monies are
for
purchasing
troubled
paper
assets.
Others are
to be
directly
injected
into the
banks as
public
supplied
capital for
private
financial
institutions,
an ironic
outcome for
the free
market
ideology
that
resulted in
the
deregulation
of the US
financial
system.
According to
news
reports, in
England the
entire $73
billion is
being poured
into banks
as publicly
supplied new
capital. In
Germany $135
billion is
for
recapitalizing
troubled
banks. In
the US
Treasury
Secretary
Paulson is
talking
about using
bailout
money to
purchase
non-voting
bank shares.
How is it
possible
that a
financial
crisis of
such
magnitude
hit with
such
suddenness
and urgency,
catching
finance
ministries
and central
banks
unaware?
If the
problem is
what the
public has
been told,
namely that
defaulting
subprime
mortgages
are reducing
the income
flows
through to
the holders
of the
mortgage
backed
securities,
why isn’t
the bailout
money being
used to
refinance
the
defaulting
mortgages
and to pay
off the
foreclosed
mortgages?
That would
restore the
value of the
mortgage
backed
securities,
and it would
not be
necessary to
pour huge
amounts of
taxpayers’
money into
recapitalizing
banks and
purchasing
their bad
assets.
There is not
an
unmanageable
number of
defaulting
mortgages.
According to
the US
Treasury
estimate,
90-93% of
the
mortgages
are good.
How does a
7% or 10%
default rate
on US
mortgages
translate
into a
systemic
worldwide
financial
crisis?
The popping
of the US
real estate
bubble could
not produce
worldwide
systemic
financial
crisis
without the
mark-to-market
rule,
short-sellers,
and a great
deal of hype
and
orchestration.
Why did
Secretary
Paulson let
Lehman Bros.
fail when
every other
firm is
bailed out?
Did Lehman’s
failure, by
unwinding
its own
large
portfolio,
push hedge
funds and
banks into
panic
selloffs
that spread
the crisis
at home and
abroad?
The US
Congress
held no
hearings on
the crisis
and
consulted no
independent
experts.
Congress
responded
dumbly to
the
financial
crisis, just
as it did
following
9/11 when
the Bush
regime
handed it
the PATRIOT
Act and the
Afghan
invasion. To
secure
Congress’
acquiescence
to the
Paulson
bailout, the
Bush regime
used threats
of meltdown
and martial
law to panic
Congress
into turning
over vast
amounts of
money for
which
accountability
is lacking.
The hype
behind the
Paulson
bailout is
the
financial
version of
the mushroom
cloud
evocation
used by the
Bush regime
to panic
Congress
into
accepting
the US
invasion of
Iraq. Is yet
another
hidden
agenda at
work?
It is
unclear how
the bailout
will play
out. The
monies for
the US
bailout will
have to be
borrowed
abroad or
printed. If
foreign
central
banks need
their dollar
reserves in
order to
bail out
their own
banks that
are polluted
with toxic
US financial
instruments,
the US
Treasury
might not
have an easy
time in the
debt market.
Moreover,
the interest
expense on
an
additional
borrowed
$700 billion
will raise
the US
current
account
deficit and
burden US
taxpayers
with higher
interest
payments. If
the money
has to be
printed,
inflation
and dollar
devaluation
will depress
living
standards
for most
Americans.
If the US
economy
sinks deeper
into
recession,
lost jobs
and rising
interest
rates on
troubled
mortgages
will result
in more
defaults and
foreclosures,
thus further
impairing
mortgage
backed
securities
and
requiring
Congress to
put more
burdens on
hard-pressed
US taxpayers
in behalf of
the banks.
The
authorities
have blamed
subprime
mortgages
for the
crisis. Why
then does
their
solution
fail to
address the
problem of
the
mortgages?
Instead, the
solution
directs
public money
into an
increasingly
concentrated
private
financial
sector, the
management
of which is
not only
vastly
overpaid,
but also has
escaped
accountability
for the
financial
chicanery
that,
allegedly,
threatens
systemic
financial
meltdown
unless
bailed out
by the
taxpayers.
Perhaps my
nose is too
sensitive,
but this
bailout
doesn’t pass
the smell
test.