Is Israel's
booming
high-tech
industry a
branch of
the Mossad?
By Yossi
Melman
October 16,
2008 "Haaretz"
---- In
2006 the
Check Point
Software
Technologies
company,
which
specializes
in
protecting
computer
systems from
hackers and
data theft,
wanted to
acquire an
American
company
called
Sourcefire,
which works
in the same
field. The
great
advantage of
Sourcefire
was that its
clients
include the
American
Defense
Department
and the
National
Security
Agency. The
U.S.
administration,
however, by
means of the
Committee on
Foreign
Investment
in the
United
States, did
not approve
the
acquisition.
The
committee
made its
decision
based on an
opinion by
the Federal
Bureau of
Investigation
and NSA
security
officers.
The two
organizations
were afraid
that Check
Point, which
was founded
by Gil Shwed
and fellow
graduates of
Unit 8200,
the Israel
Defense
Forces'
high-tech
intelligence
unit, would
have access
to
top-secret
information,
which it
could pass
on to
Israel's
intelligence
community.
The fear and
suspicion
currently is
directed not
only toward
Check Point,
but also
other
Israeli
high-tech
companies
like Verint,
Comverse,
NICE Systems
and PerSay
Voice
Biometrics,
some of
which work
in data
mining and
engage in
software
development
for tapping
telephones,
fax
machines,
e-mail and
computer
communications.
The above
accusations
come from
journalist
and writer
James
Bamford,
whose new
book, "The
Shadow
Factory: The
Ultra-Secret
NSA from
9/11 to the
Eavesdropping
on America"
(Doubleday),
came out
this week in
the United
States.
Bamford, a
former
producer for
the ABC
television
network, has
spent the
last 30
years
writing
about the
NSA - one of
the most
important
and
least-known
intelligence
agencies in
the United
States, but
usually in
the shadow
of the
Central
Intelligence
Agency. The
NSA is
responsible
for
eavesdropping
on
telephones,
fax machines
and
computers;
intercepting
communications
and
electromagnetic
signals from
radar
equipment,
aircraft,
missiles,
ships and
submarines;
and decoding
transmissions
and cracking
codes. It
has
contributed
immeasurably
to U.S.
intelligence
and national
security.
In this
respect, the
United
States
resembles
Israel:
Successes
attributed
to the
Mossad
should often
be credited
to other
intelligence
units -
first and
foremost
Unit 8200,
the Israeli
equivalent
of the NSA.
This is
Bamford's
third book,
and it
affords a
look into
the mazes of
the NSA. In
1982 the
Justice
department
threatened
to prosecute
him for
revealing
agency
secrets in
his first
book, "The
Puzzle
Palace:
Inside the
National
Security
Agency,
America's
Most Secret
Intelligence
Organization."
In his
second book,
"Body of
Secrets:
Anatomy of
the
Ultra-Secret
National
Security
Agency," he
described
the NSA with
a great deal
of
enthusiasm,
which made
him the
organization's
hero of the
day. The NSA
even
organized a
party in his
honor at
headquarters
in Fort
Meade,
Maryland.
His new
book, which
is critical
of the NSA,
has sent him
back to his
starting
point.
Bamford's
main thesis
is that
before
September
11, 2001,
the agency
failed along
with other
intelligence
agencies in
understanding
the Al-Qaida
threat, even
though it
had
intercepted
members'
phone calls
and e-mails.
This stemmed
in part from
excessive
caution for
upholding
laws and
respecting
citizens'
privacy. In
April 2000,
then-NSA
director
general
Michael
Hayden
(currently
the director
of the CIA),
vividly
described to
a
Congressional
committee
how, if at
that very
moment Osama
bin Laden
were to step
onto the
Peace Bridge
at Niagara
Falls and
cross into
the United
States, "my
people must
respect his
rights."
After the
September 11
attacks on
the World
Trade Center
and the
Pentagon,
the
organization
swung over
to the other
extreme.
According to
Bamford,
since
September 11
the NSA has
had no
compunctions
about
violating
the
Constitution
and has been
eavesdropping
on American
citizens.
One of the
outstanding
examples in
the book,
which has
been
well-covered
in the
American
media, is
the fact
that the NSA
has listened
in on
bedroom
conversations
of
journalists,
military
officers and
officials
serving in
Iraq. The
NSA may
eavesdrop on
and
intercept
transmissions
outside the
United
States, but
cannot do so
to American
citizens
without a
court order.
Another of
Bamford's
important
assertions,
which also
concerns
Israel, is
that the
largest
telephony
and
communications
companies in
the United
States - in
fact all of
them except
QWEST - have
cooperated
with the NSA,
allowing it
to tap their
lines and
optic
fibers.
The
above-mentioned
Israeli
companies
and others
are
important
software and
technology
suppliers
for not only
the American
telephony
companies,
but for the
NSA itself.
Bamford
claims that
80 percent
of all
American
telephone
transmissions
are
conducted by
means of the
Israeli
companies'
technology,
know-how and
accessibility.
Thus,
Bamford
believes,
the American
intelligence
community is
exposing
itself to
the risk
that the
Israeli
companies
will access
its most
secret and
sensitive
digital
information.
Bamford does
not provide
any backing
for this
thesis; he
only points
to a
circumstantial
relationship.
The Israeli
companies
were largely
established
by graduates
of 8200, and
therefore he
says they
are
connected by
their
umbilical
cords to
Israeli
intelligence,
and their
CEOs and
boards of
directors
include
senior Shin
Bet
officials
like Arik
Nir or
former
Mossad chief
Ephraim
Halevy (Nir
is the CEO
of Athlone
Global
Security, a
hedge fund
that has
invested
inter alia
in PerSay
Voice
Biometrics,
and Ephraim
Halevy is a
member of
the Athlone
Advisory
Board).
To put it
mildly,
Bamford has
no love lost
for Israel.
In his
articles, he
publishes
claims by
American
Navy
officials
who believe
Israel
maliciously
attacked the
American spy
ship Liberty
during the
1967 Six-Day
War. He
holds that
the
September 11
attack did
not stem
from radical
Islam's
basic hatred
of America,
but rather
from its
anger at the
United
States'
support for
Israel. He
calls the
nineteen
September 11
terrorists
"soldiers"
and
describes
them with a
great deal
of sympathy
- Davids who
"only"
demolished
four
airplanes of
the American
Goliath.
In this
context, and
apparently
because of
his deep
hostility,
Bamford
asserts that
in light of
the
problematic
record of
Israel,
which did
not hesitate
to spy
against
America on
American
soil,
Israeli
companies
should not
have been
given the
keys to the
kingdom of
America's
secrets. His
attitude
toward
Israel
apparently
pushes him
over the
psychological
brink, as
his book
hardly
mentions the
close
cooperation
between the
two
countries'
intelligence
communities,
mainly in
the war
against
international
jihad terror
or in
monitoring
Iran.
© Copyright
2008
Haaretz. All
rights
reserved