|
On Israel, Congress Still Obedient
By MJ Rosenberg June 16, 2010 "Media Matters" -- Forget that "collective punishment" is illegal under international law. Forget that Turkey is a NATO ally to whom we are bound by treaty (an armed attack on Turkey is considered an attack on the United States). And definitely forget the admonition to have "a decent respect to the opinions of mankind...." None of these come into play when the government of Israel requires the government of the United States to defend it from criticism (no matter what the provocation). And, to be honest, the Obama administration behaves no differently in this regard than previous administrations. It's all "your wish is my command." That is the gist of a Bloomberg News story today called "Obama's Policy Showing No Difference With Clinton-Bush."
The Netanyahu government and its lobbyists here point to this as evidence of devotion to Israel's cause. It isn't. After all, Israel's cause (the survival and security of the Jewish state) are hardly served by spiteful and pointless actions that accomplish nothing except to increase Israel's isolation. No, the rush to support bad (even suicidal) Israeli policies is impelled by politics, plain and simple. For now, I'd just like to cite a few of the endorsements Israel's attack on the Gaza flotilla has elicited from Congress. It is useful to know the lengths that some members of Congress will go to maintain the good will (and more) of the "pro-Israel" lobby. (Note: I always put the term "pro-Israel" in quotation marks because the effect of the lobby's work is anything but good for Israel.) Also note, the lobby has told its supporters in Congress to always defend the flotilla raid with the phrase "Israel has the right to defend itself." The phrase was crafted with the goal of distorting the facts about the raid. It was not about self-defense. No one disputes Israel's right to defend itself. And that means that no one can legitimately question Israel's right to keep weapons of any kind out of the hands of Hamas. But that does not explain or justify its ban on chocolate, on spices, on wheelchairs or, in fact, on most grocery items. And check this out: the Jerusalem Post is reporting that, in the face of international criticism, Israel is now permitting the entry into Gaza of soda, juice, shaving cream, potato chips, cookies and candy. That, in itself, is an admission of what the blockade is about: punishing innocent people, not Israel's self-defense. I mean, it's hard to believe that chocolate chip cookies have threatened Israel's security until now. As Senator Chuck Schumer said the other day, the blockade is designed to "strangle them [the Palestinians in Gaza] economically." He also said that doing so "makes sense." Schumer, of course, is far from alone. Here are some excerpts from Democratic Senators and Representatives endorsing Israel's attack on the flotilla. It's the same old, same old. "Israel is right." "The Palestinians are wrong." And — now this is new — "the Turks are no good either." I don't cite Republicans because their views on this fit in so well with their hawkish views on pretty much every other issue. For the Democrats, the exception-to-the-rule is pronounced. Excerpts follow. Full texts can be found here, on the AIPAC website.
Our United States Congress hard at work, doing what it's told. See also: Democrats demand flotilla "terrorists" be denied entry into U.S.: A half-dozen elected Democrats called on the State Department to ban every flotilla participant from entering the United States. |
|||||
