NEWS YOU WON'T FIND ON CNN

 

.                

AFI RESEARCH INTELL.BRIEFING


A war fought on a multitude of levels.

The intelligence services opened up significant channels to the Iraqi military and political leadership itself and these may have indeed proved of the greatest importance in understanding the final and precipitate collapse of resistance in Baghdad and elsewhere.

 

Contact  Richard Bennett Media   

16th April 2003 

 
A war fought on a multitude of levels.
The important events that led up to the War on Iraq, the circumstances surrounding the final decision to invade and the actual course of the conflict itself have all been shrouded in a fog of mystery and disinformation. Trying to identify the crucial elements of the military campaign; the unconventional and original tactics; the intelligence war and the political infighting has proved not surprisingly well beyond the capabilities of most of the worlds news media. However as more information begins to leak out it is quickly becoming clear that this was a war fought on many levels and not least for the minds of the Iraqi leadership and the Western electorates.
~
Watching the amazing 350 mile dash along the desert roads by the 3rd (US) Infantry Division towards Baghdad and the US Marine Corps crashing through the defences in Central Iraq raised a number of perfectly sound military questions such as why two fine but seemingly ill-chosen 'heavy' infantry units should be used in what would normally be the domain of an Armoured Division, while the British 1st Armoured Division with the famed 7th 'Desert Rats' Tank Brigade and the 16th Air Assault Brigade of the legendry 'Para's' should be deployed just across the few miles to Basra and basically sit there for three weeks slowly investing the city has puzzled many observers. It has been suggested that this may be taken as a comment on the reliability of much of the British equipment and the lack of the logistic support that would be required for a significant advance towards Baghdad, rather than any lack of confidence by CENTCOM in the fighting ability of the British troops.
~
Too little attention has been paid so far to the outstanding operations conducted by Special Forces units from the United States and those of Britain and Australia. Here a remarkable level of co-operation was achieved between the highly specialized formations such as Delta Force; the 160th; SEAL's, and the various US Army and Marine special forces with the intelligence paramilitaries of both the CIA and Israel's Mossad. The SBS and the SAS Regiments from both Britain and Australia were also deeply committed along with elements from their respective intelligence services; MI6(SIS) and the ASIS. The Iraqi regime was targeted for some months by covert operations to identify possible sites for WMD; leadership bunkers and the whole command, control and communication system. Perhaps even more importantly the intelligence services opened up significant channels to the Iraqi military and political leadership itself and these may have indeed proved of the greatest importance in understanding the final and precipitate collapse of resistance in Baghdad and elsewhere.
~
Once the war began with an attempted elimination of much of the regimes leadership, the covert operations began to quickly destabilize the entire structure of the Iraqi political and military command. Assassinations; sabotage and the accurate targeting of vital facilities played a truly significant part in the victory. However, the links established with potential traitors inside the Army and the Republican Guard were to later hit 'pay-dirt' in a big way. Although the Coalition forces did indeed face considerable opposition from elements of the main Iraqi combat formations and from Ba'ath Party loyalists and Fedayeen, little in the way of cohesive defence was offered at any of the crucial choke points.The Iraqi's indeed seemed to have not taken the threat of invasion seriously or simply accepted that they could not offer significant resistance. There was no concerted attempt to destroy the oil fields; vital river bridges; dams or to flood the low-lying approaches to many of the main cities. Few mine fields were laid or defensive zones built with strong points. Even in Baghdad, a city difficult to defend at any time, little was done to deny the US forces either the bridges or the use of the wide avenues of approach. Buildings were not fortified and indeed no attempt was made to withdraw large numbers of combat units into the city to deny the US air assault easy targets.
~
According to a number of intelligence sources in both the Gulf and Israel; the Russian Ambassador to Iraq and indeed former Iraqi military officers, the links the CIA and US Special Forces had previously made with Iraqi commanders effectively resulted in the surrender of Baghdad. Even the Republican Guard were apparently ordered at a crucial moment not to blow certain bridges south of the City and to withdraw allowing the US Marines to make their unexpected appearance in the suburbs of Baghdad. In return for not being included on Washington's list of 55 of the regimes most wanted, some senior Iraqi military commanders ensured that armoured vehicles were arrayed in such a way that they presented no immediate threat and basically ordered their remaining soldiers to 'go home'. In return for the safety of their families and ultimate escape, senior Iraq commanders gave the US military the keys to Baghdad, Mosul, and Tikrit.
~
Rumours abound about the fate of Saddam Hussein and much of the senior leadership. It is thought likely that the Coalition succeeded in killing some, but the rest are believed to still be in hiding or to have fled abroad. The list of their bolt-holes is growing; Iran and Syria; France and Russia and perhaps most intriguingly even Saudi Arabia as it has been suggested that the Saudi Government played no small part in establishing the links to dissident elements within the Baghdad regime. A  theory put forward however by certain Gulf intelligence sources and given some endorsement by the Russians is that just before the final collapse of Baghdad Saddam died, either as the result of the US 'getting lucky' or by the actions of a group of officers planning to save themselves and the lives of many of their young soldiers by ending further resistance. 
~
The current 'buzz' around Washington and Langley is that certain elements of the Iraqi political and military elite along with significant Republican Guard forces have escaped to Syria in order to maintain some form of resistance to US occupation of Iraq, however without definite proof this must remain only a distant possibility. Whatever the fate of the Iraqi dictator and his sons the true events behind the 2003 War against Iraq are likely to be quite remarkable and indeed very different from the conflict portrayed 24 hours a day on the TV News or endlessly pontificated about by countless long retired Generals. It is an example of the fact that modern war is indeed fought on a multitude of levels; political, diplomatic, economic, psychological, intelligence, disinformation and propaganda, information and cyber warfare, unconventional operations and probably last of all, the use of conventional military might. It is a salutatory lesson for all those nations that may have cause to fear being next on Washington's list for regime change. 
~
Richard M. Bennett and Maj. Frank Hayes
~
Richard Bennett Media.  rbmedia@supanet.com

 


Join our Daily News Headlines Email Digest

Fill out your emailaddress
to receive our newsletter!
SubscribeUnsubscribe
Powered by YourMailinglistProvider.com

Information Clearing House

Daily News Headlines Digest

HOME

COPYRIGHT NOTICE