CONFIRMED: US Claims Against Syria - There is no Evidence
By Tony Cartalucci
Clearing House -
The Wall Street
Journal has confirmed what many suspected, that the West's
so-called "evidence" of the latest alleged "chemical attacks" in
Syria, pinned on the Syrian government are fabrications spun up
from the West's own dubious intelligence agencies.
The Wall Street Journal reveals that the US is citing claims
from Israel's Mossad intelligence agency fed to the Central
Intelligence Agency (CIA), a repeat of the fabrications that led
up to the Iraq War, the Libyan War, and have been used now for 3
years to justify continued support of extremists operating
within and along Syria's borders.
Wall Street Journal's article, "U.S.,
Allies Prepare to Act as Syria Intelligence Mounts,"
crucial piece of the emerging case came from Israeli spy
services, which provided the Central Intelligence Agency
with intelligence from inside an elite special Syrian unit
that oversees Mr. Assad's chemical weapons, Arab diplomats
said. The intelligence, which the CIA was able to verify,
showed that certain types of chemical weapons were moved in
advance to the same Damascus suburbs where the attack
allegedly took place a week ago, Arab diplomats said.
Mossad and the CIA are clearly compromised in terms of
objectivity and legitimacy. Neither exists nor is expected to
provide impartial evidence, but rather to facilitate by all
means necessary the self-serving agendas, interests, and
objectives of their respective governments.
That both Israel and the United States,
as far back as 2007 have openly conspired together to overthrow
the government of Syria through a carefully engineered
sectarian bloodbath, discredits entirely their respective
intelligence agencies. This is precisely why an impartial,
objective third-party investigation has been called for by the
international community and agreed upon by the Syrian government
- a third-party investigation the US has now urged to be
canceled ahead of its planned military strikes.
Wall Street Journal reports:
email on Sunday, White House National Security Adviser Susan
Rice told U.N. Ambassador Samantha Power and other top
officials that the U.N. mission was pointless because the
chemical weapons evidence already was conclusive, officials
said. The U.S. privately urged the U.N. to pull the
inspectors out, setting the stage for President Barack Obama
to possibly move forward with a military response, officials
then, not Syria, is attempting a coverup, with fabrications in
place from discredited, compromised intelligence sources and the
threat of impending military strikes that would endanger the UN
inspection team's safety should they fail to end their
investigation and withdraw.
The Wall Street Journal also reiterated that the US is
planning to fully sidestep the UN Security Council and proceed
with its partners unilaterally:
the U.S. chose to strike, it would do so with allies and
without the U.N., in order to sidestep an expected Russian
proceeds now with absolute disregard for international law, all
but declaring it has no intention of providing credible evidence
of its accusations against the Syrian government. It is a rush
to war with all the hallmarks of dangerous desperation as the
West's proxy forces collapse before the Syrian military. Western
military leaders must consider the strategic tenants and
historical examples regarding the dangers and folly of haste and
imprudence in war - especially war fought to protect special
interests and political agendas rather than to defend territory.
The populations of the West must likewise consider what benefits
they have garnered from the last decade of military conquest
their leaders have indulged in. Crumbling economies gutted to
feed the preservation of special interests and the growing
domestic security apparatuses to keep these interests safe from
both domestic and foreign dissent are problems that will only
grow more acute.
Outside of the West, in Moscow, Beijing, and Tehran, leaders
must consider a future where Western special interests can
invade with impunity, without public support, or even the
tenuous semblance of justification being necessary.
This article was originally published at
What's your response?
Scroll down to add / read comments
Please read our
Comment Policy before posting -
We ask readers to play a proactive role and click
the "Report link [at the base of each comment] when
in your opinion, comments cross the line and become
purely offensive, racist or disrespectful to others.