GOP, Not Laughing
By Steven Jonas
Ted Cruz:
another insignificant man clawing his way up the corrupt pyramid of American
power.
April 23, 2015 "Information
Clearing House" - "Greanville
Post" -
Do
you want to know where the GOP stands, generically, for 2016?
Well, there is one fascinating place to get that information.
It’s called “GOP.com” (in the logo there is an elephant in the dot —
that’s the party of non-cuteness trying so hard to be cute).
It is indeed the main website of the Repubs.
I put myself on their mailing list just so I can stay current with what
they are talking about. (Of course
that does from time-to-time [ho, ho, ho] stand at variance with what they are
actually doing).
It presents what I presume is the
(lowest?) common denominator, currently, that will underlie the 2016 GOP
platform. I share its main features
with you, below. For they are most
revealing about what the party is about, and even more what it is not about.
Of
course, as you know well, a number of candidates for the Repub. nomination have
already entered the race. They each
present certain variants to the common denominator, or at least they try to, to
“show their independence” (even though whomever gets the Party’s nod will be so
dependent upon its big money men and their whims and wishes.)
There’s
Ted Cruz, who along with the standard stuff is
trying very hard to capture the standard of the Christian Right.
He started out right there at Liberty University and at times seemed to
be claiming the endorsement of the Liberty University version of Jesus Christ
himself. (Of course, that version
varies in many dimensions from those of many other Christian churches, but that
is a matter for another time).
Then
there is the self-styled “libertarian,” the ophthalmologist, Rand Paul, MD.
No one ever seems to stop to bother defining exactly what
“libertarianism” is in any detail, but whatever it might be, Paul’s very own
definition of “liberty” does vary in meaning from that of the commons. On the
one hand, not being officially Board Certified in his specialty by the
American Board of Ophthalmology,
Dr. Paul once upon a time took the liberty of setting up
his own Ophthalmological Board in his home state of
Kentucky. That might be called
“taking some liberties.” On the
other hand, he is firmly opposed to liberty for pregnant women to decide for
themselves the outcome of pregnancy until the time of viability.
Until very recently
he had been a sponsor of the religion-based “Life at Conception
Act”. Now his
site
settles for advocating every single religious-belief based possible restriction
on the exercise of abortion rights, still with the website heading for the
subject area: “Sanctity of Life.”
Next
we find Marco Rubio (left), son of Cuban refugees, but not from Castro, rather
from Batista,
who doesn’t seem to know what he stands for on a
variety of issues, such as immigration, exactly of which church he is a member
(Mormon, Catholic, or Baptist — on certain policy issues they vary widely), and
even Cuba, for there are strong right-wing business interests that are very
happy with the “Obama-opening.”
But
whoever the nominee is, he/she (don’t forget the failed HP executive Carly
Simon) will have to gravitate back to the GOP version of the (Far Right)
“center.” And here ‘tis, right from
GOP.com.
If you are a good Repub., site says, you will believe mainly in a set of slogans
and sayings (with exceptions):
“our
country is exceptional” (as long as you don’t mention such “exceptionalities” as
being the only advanced capitalist country not to have some form of national
health insurance);
the
“Constitution should be honored,
valued, and upheld” (as long as you also support violating the provisions of
Article VI pertaining to such international treaties as the UN Convention
Against Torture);
“Leaders
should serve people, not special interests” (as long as “special interests” in
this context does not mean, for example, the Koch Brothers or Sheldon Adelson);
“Families
and communities should be strong and free from government intrusion” (except
when there is “government intrusion” on such matters ranging from freedom of
choice in the outcome of pregnancy to communities choosing to ban fracking
locally to protect their drinking water);
the
“institution of traditional marriage is the foundation of society” (as long as
“marriage” is defined according to certain religious preferences);
“government should be smaller, smarter and more efficient” (except when it comes
to such matters as continuing to carry on the
totally failed “war on
certain drug users”);
“Health
care decisions should be made by us and our doctors” (except when they come to
such matters as
end-of-life care);
“paychecks should not be wasted on poorly run government programs” (unless it’s
for the
F-35 program or ships the
Navy cannot use effectively);
the
military must be strong and prepared to defend our shores” (without defining
what “protect our shores” means, precisely, how much that would cost, and where
the money would come from);
“culture
should respect and protect life” (seemingly to define “life” as existing before
birth but not after it);
“children
should never be left in failing schools” (without defining “failing schools” or
proposing what to do too fix them other than crushing the teachers’ unions);
“veterans should have the best care and opportunities in the world” (unless that
would require at least the restoration of funds to the VA that
consecutive Repub. Congresses have cut out of their
budgets as demands for service have increased)
“social
programs should help lift people out of poverty” (except when they are members
of the very useful — for the capitalist class — permanent army of the
unemployed);
and
“America should be energy independent” (except when it comes to solar, wind, and
other renewable sources of energy).
My-oh-my, what a target the Repubs.
give us. It is redolent with the
smell of oh-so-easy political pickings.
But ah, is there a Democrat out there who can pick at those pickings and
who has the nerve to do so? Aye.
There’s the rub. Where is
Thomas Cromwell when we need him?
Steven Jonas, MD, MPH is
a Professor Emeritus of Preventive Medicine at Stony Brook University (NY) and
author/co-author/editor/co-editor of over 30 books. In addition to his role with
The Greanville Post,
he is a Contributor for American Politics to
The
Planetary Movement,
a columnist for BuzzFlash@Truthout,
a “Trusted Author” for
OpEdNews,
and the Editorial Director of and a Contributing Author
to
The Political Junkies for Progressive Democracy.
Dr. Jonas’ latest book is The
15% Solution: How the Republican Religious Right Took Control of the U.S.,
1981-2022: A futuristic Novel, Brewster, NY, Trepper &
Katz Impact Books, Punto Press Publishing, 2013,
http://www.puntopress.com/jonas-the-15-solution-hits-main-distribution/, and
available on Amazon.
© The Greanville Post • Vol. IX