Why Seymour
Hersh’s Story On Osama bin Laden’s Death Rings True
Adnan Khan explains why Hersh’s controversial story about the al Qaeda leader’s
killing could be true—and demands our attention
By Adnan R. Khan
May 17, 2015 "Information
Clearing House" - "Maclean's"
- This week, Seymour Hersh, America’s most famous and controversial
investigative journalist, caused an uproar with his allegations that the U.S.
government account of the 2011 killing of Osama bin Laden in Pakistan was a lie.
According to his version of events, published in the
London Review of Books, bin Laden was not only living under the protection
of the Pakistani military but the raid that nabbed him was planned and executed
with Pakistani consent.Critics, White House officials
in particular, have strongly condemned the allegations, accusing Hersh of
conspiratorial excess. Hersh relies on anonymous sources and unnamed insiders,
they say, and builds a narrative of events that are impossible to verify.
Nonetheless, based on my own experiences reporting in Pakistan, his story does
ring true.
And here’s why:
In November 2009, one and half years before the Navy
SEAL operation that killed him, I was told by a Pakistani militant that Osama
bin Laden was in a safehouse in Abbottabad, a garrison city 100 km north of the
Pakistani capital Islamabad. The militant, a former member of the Lashkar e
Taiba (LeT), one of Pakistan’s most powerful jihadi groups with close ties to
the Pakistani military, was absolutely certain.
“Osama bin Laden is here,” he told me while we were driving
through the town on our way to the capital. “The ISI are protecting him. The
senior LeT commanders are close with the ISI. They all know he’s here.”
I didn’t believe him. Abbottabad is one of Pakistan’s most
important military cities, home to the Pakistan Military Academy, the equivalent
of West Point. Much of its population is made up of retired military officers.
But nine months later, according to Hersh’s account, a former
senior Pakistani intelligence officer would walk into the U.S. Embassy in
Islamabad and tell the CIA station chief more or less the same thing: Osama bin
Laden was in Abbottabad.
I’ve kept that bit of information to myself these past few
years. Even while I was back in Abbottabad covering the killing of bin Laden in
May 2011, I said nothing about it, partly because by then my source, the former
LeT fighter, had disappeared.
So why am I revealing this now?
I think it’s important, after Seymour Hersh’s revelations, to
revisit what happened in the lead-up to an event that possibly changed the
course of history.
At the time, the event certainly felt like theatre. There was
a great deal of circumstantial evidence that clashed with the official narrative
being put forth. The Pakistani military denied they had any knowledge of bin
Laden’s presence in Abbottabad; the Americans denied they had carried out the
raid with Pakistani consent. According to President Barack Obama’s version of
events, detailed in a
press conference hours after the operation, this was a monumental act of
derring-do, carried out by the world’s premier military using elite soldiers and
top-secret technology. It was a Hollywood script (and would later become one,
the 2013 Academy Award-nominated Zero Dark Thirty) complete with easily
identifiable heroes and villains. None of it sat very well with me.
This is what I knew: a mid-level militant from a group with
known ties to Pakistan’s intelligence services knew bin Laden was in Abbottabad.
If he knew, it’s fair to say the Pakistani military knew. Locals I spoke to in
the neighbourhood of the compound where bin Laden was staying all told me it was
an ISI facility. The white Potohar jeeps they saw almost daily were a dead
giveaway: “The ISI bought thousands of those cars in the late 1990s for its
officers,” an ISI insider told me at the time. “It’s a running joke in Pakistan:
if you see a white Potohar in your rearview mirror, be careful, the ISI is on
your tail.”
Other ISI contacts were dumbfounded: how could a U.S. Navy
Seal team manage to fly into one of the most heavily guarded garrison cities in
Pakistan, carry out an assault lasting nearly an hour—in a quiet residential
neighbourhood two kilometres from an elite military college—and then fly out
without any response from the Pakistani military?
Someone had to have known, I was told repeatedly, and that
someone had to be at the highest level of the military command. The U.S. had to
have had Pakistani blessing for the operation.
What Hersh provides is more detail. More importantly, he
offers us the opportunity to question the widening gap between what our leaders
are doing and what they tell us they are doing. According to his view, we are
living through an era of scripted events, engineered realities designed to
achieve political goals. If his view is true – and there is mounting evidence
that it is – then it deserves our attention.