.

THE ADMINISTRATION'S IRAQ GATE SCANDAL
(BY WILLIAM SAFIRE)
(Extension of Remarks - May 19, 1992)
[Page: E1428]
---
HON. TOM LANTOS
in the House of Representatives
TUESDAY, MAY 19, 1992
- Mr. LANTOS. Mr. Speaker, just 1 year ago, Americans were flush
with the glow of the military victory over Saddam Hussein. Parades
were held in the largest of cities and in the smallest of hamlets.
New York and Washington were trying to outdo each other in the
splendor of their competing celebrations of victory.
- This year, however, we are wallowing in the sordid aftermath of
the revelations of the misguided administration policy that brought
about that war. We have been treated to details of how the
administration bent over backwards in its misguided effort to
support the regime of Saddam Hussein on the very eve of the Iraqi
invasion of Kuwait.
- Mr. Speaker, William Safire summarized this squalid tale of policy
run amuck in an excellent article that appeared in yesterday's issue
of the New York Times. I ask that this article be placed in the Record,
and I urge my colleagues to read it carefully.
(BY WILLIAM SAFIRE)
Washington: Americans now know that the war in the
Persian Gulf was brought about by a colossal foreign-policy blunder:
George Bush's decision, after the Iran-Iraq war ended, to entrust
regional security to Saddam Hussein.
What is not yet widely understood is how that benighted policy led to
the Bush Administration's fraudulent use of public funds, its sustained
deception of Congress and its obstruction of justice.
As the Saudi Ambassador, Prince Bandar, was urging Mr. Bush and Mr.
Baker to buy the friendship of the Iraqi dictator in August 1989, the
F.B.I. uncovered a huge scam at the Atlanta branch of the Lavoro Bank to
finance the buildup of Iraq's war machine by diverting U.S.-guaranteed
grain loans.
Instead of pressing the investigation or curbing the appeasement, the
President turned a blind eye to lawbreaking and directed another billion
dollars to Iraq. Our State and Agriculture Department's complicity in
Iraq's duplicity transformed what could have been dealt with as
`Saddam's Lavoro scandal' into George Bush's Iraqgate.
The first element of corruption is the wrongful application of U.S.
credit guarantees. Neither the Commodity Credit Corporation nor the
Export-Import Bank runs a foreign-aid program; their purpose is to
stimulate U.S. exports. High-risk loan guarantees to achieve
foreign-policy goals unlawful endanger that purpose.
Yet we now know that George Bush personally leaned on Ex-Im to
subvert its charter--not to promote our exports but to promote relations
with the dictator. And we have evidence that James Baker overrode
worries in Agriculture and O.M.B. that the law was being perverted: Mr.
Baker's closest aid, Robert Kimmett, wrote triumphantly, `your call to .
. . Yeutter . . . paid off.' Former Agriculture Secretary Clayton
Yeutter is now under White House protection.
Second element of corruption is the misleading of Congress. When the
charge was made two years ago in this space that State was improperly
intervening in this case, Mr. Baker's top Middle East aide denied it to
Senate Foreign Relations; meanwhile, Yeutter aides deceived Senator
Leahy's Agriculture Committee about the real foreign-policy purpose of
the C.C.C. guarantees. To carry out Mr. Bush's infamous National
Security Directive 26, lawful oversight was systematically blinded.
Third area of Iraqgate corruption is the obstruction of justice.
Atlanta's assistant U.S. Attorney Gail McKenzie, long blamed here for
foot-dragging, would not withhold from a grand jury what she has already
told friends: that indictment of Lavoro officials was held up for nearly
a year by the Bush Criminal Division. The long delay in prosecution
enabled James Baker to shake credits for Saddam out of malfeasant
Agriculture appointees.
When House Banking Chairman Henry Gonzalez gathered documents marked
`secret' showing this pattern of corruption, he put them in the
Congressional Record. Two months later, as the media awakened, Mr. Bush
gave the familiar `gate' order; stonewall.
`Public disclosure of classified information harms the national
security,' Attorney General William Barr instructed the House Banking
Committee last week. `. . . in light of your recent disclosures, the
executive branch will not provide any more classified
information'--unless the wrongdoing is kept secret.
`Your threat to withhold documents,' responded Chairman Gonzalez,
`has all the earmarks of a classic effort to obstruct a proper and
legitimate investigation . . . none of the documents compromise, in any
fashion whatsoever, the national security or intelligence sources and
methods.'
Mr. Barr, in personal jeopardy, has flung down the gauntlet. Chairman
Gonzalez tells me he plans to present his obstruction case this week to
House Judiciary Chairman Jack Brooks, probably flanked by
Representatives Charles Schumer and Barney Frank, members of both
committees.
`I will recommend that Judiciary consider requiring the appointment
of an independent counsel,' says Mr. Gonzalez, who has been given reason
to believe that Judiciary--capable of triggering the Ethics in
Government Act--will be persuaded to act.
Policy blunders are not crimes. But perverting the purpose of
appropriated funds is a crime; lying to Congress compounds that crime;
and obstructing justice to cover up the original crime is a criminal
conspiracy.
[Page: E1429]
END
Join our Daily News Headlines
Email Digest
|
|
Information
Clearing House
Daily News Headlines
Digest
|
HOME
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
|