.
Terrorist
Attacks: Bush Plays with the Numbers.
We are treated as the idiot children of a despot, not capable
of entertaining the truth
By Craig Hulet
07/31/03 (InformationClearingHouse)
Every week American soldiers are being killed and wounded by the growing
guerrilla resistance in Iraq, and not just in Baghdad. Rumsfeld calls
them subversives and other trite names to cloud the truth: we are
occupying Iraq not liberating anyone. He has even suggested that
Saddam's remnants are "paying" individuals to attack US
troops! Amazing!
The topic of this article is multi-faceted regarding several main
topics. On the one hand, Mr. Colin Powell has been instructed to declare
to the outside world we are winning the war on terrorism; we won in
Iraq; there were elections in Afghanistan and there will soon be the
same in Iraq. The obedient US media parrots the propaganda unflinchingly
amidst charges of fabricating everything from news stories to
photographs of events that never happened. Not in America though. We, on
the other hand here in America, are treated as the idiot children of a
despot, not capable of entertaining the truth; the chosen term "entertain[ing]ment"
objectively picked for obvious reasons. Mr. Bush is being hailed
worldwide as the greatest liar to ever sit on the throne of empire while
the empire itself is being debated vigorously throughout the rest of the
world. I shall begin my analysis heretofore:
Beginning with the much ballyhooed report recently in the mainstream
media, "Patterns of Global Terrorism" released by the Office
of the Coordinator for Counter-terrorism on April 30, 2003, we shall
take a closer look at what we hear and what we ought to be told in
proper fashion. Beginning with the section titled, "The Year in
Review":
"International terrorists conducted 199 attacks in 2002, a
significant drop (44%) from the 355 attacks recorded during 2001. A
total of 725 persons were killed in last year’s attacks, far fewer
than the 3,295 persons killed the previous year, which included the
thousands of fatalities resulting from the September 11 attacks in New
York, Washington, and Pennsylvania."
Deduct the number of fatalities due to 9/11 and we actually have had an
increase in typical terrorist attacks whereby persons were killed: some
300 during 2001 compared to 725 during 2002! Which is better than double
the number of deaths! What this says is that while the number of
"incidents" have decreased their deadliness has
"increased" better than twofold.
"A total of 2,013 persons were wounded by terrorists in 2002, down
from the 2,283 persons wounded the year before." Again, we are not
told how many of those wounded during 2001 were from the atypical 9/11
event, and therefore there was once again an increase in wounded due to
typical terrorist attacks. In other words terrorism’s deadliness
increased due (in this analysts previous report "A Record of
Terror") to our war in Afghanistan and preparation for war with
Iraq. The Report goes on to add, "The number of anti-US attacks was
77, down 65% from the previous year’s total of 219. The main reason
for the decrease was the sharp drop in oil pipeline bombings in Colombia
(41 last year, compared to 178 in 2001)."
But, oil pipeline bombings yet to come will most certainly take place on
a regular basis when the Afghanistan to Pakistan pipeline is completed
and, as well, the proposed Iraq to Israel pipeline. The American
taxpayer insures these pipelines so we will hear little about these
attacks in the American press. Just as most have not heard of the many
attacks on oil pipelines in Columbia. Which makes sense as the American
people, dutifully mesmerized by the Middle East, have little clue as to
the brutality of the American-led Drug War going on in Columbia. Another
reason is that the tactic of terror is different than that of an ongoing
guerrilla war; we will see an increase in attacks on Americans over
these next years. Their deadliness will increase as well. But as with
this 2002 Report, the numbers will obfuscate rather than delineate the
reality.
In any case, separately I feel I should report the following from the
State Department Report: "Thirty US citizens were killed in
terrorist attacks last year:
· On 15 January, terrorists in Bayt Sahur, West Bank, attacked a
vehicle carrying two persons, killing one and wounding the other. The
individual killed, Avi Boaz, held dual US-Israeli citizenship. The Al-Aqsa
Martyrs Brigade claimed responsibility.
· On 23 January, Daniel Pearl, the Wall Street Journal’s South Asia
bureau chief was kidnapped in Karachi, Pakistan. On 21 February, it was
learned that he had been murdered.
· On 31 January, two hikers on the slopes of the Pinatubo volcano in
the Philippines were attacked by militants. One of the hikers, US
citizen Brian Thomas Smith, was killed.
· On 16 February, a suicide bomber detonated a device at a pizzeria in
Karnei Shomron in the West Bank, killing four persons and wounding 27
others. Two US citizens-Keren Shatsky, and Rachel Donna Thaler-were
among the dead. The Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine
claimed responsibility.
On 14 March, two US citizens-Jaime Raul and Jorge Alberto Orjuela-were
murdered in Cali, Colombia, by motorcycle-riding gunmen.
· On 17 March, grenades were thrown into a Protestant church in
Islamabad, Pakistan, killing five persons including two US citizens,
Barbara Green and Kristen Wormsley.
· On 27 March, a HAMAS homicide bomber entered the crowded restaurant
of a hotel in Netanya, Israel, and detonated a bomb, killing 22 persons,
including one US citizen, Hannah Rogen.
· On 7 June, US citizen Martin Burnham, who along with his wife, Gracia,
had been held hostage for more than a year in the Philippines by the Abu
Sayyaf Group, was killed as Philippine military units on a rescue
mission engaged the terrorists in a firefight. Gracia Burnham was
wounded.
· On 31 July, a bomb planted by HAMAS terrorists exploded at Hebrew
University in Jerusalem, killing nine persons and wounding 87 others.
Among the dead were five US citizens-Benjamin Blutstein, Marla Bennett,
Diane Leslie Carter, Janis Ruth Coulter, and David Gritz.
· On 8 October, in Failaka Island, Kuwait, gunmen attacked US soldiers
conducting a live-fire exercise killing one Marine, Lance Cpl. Antonio
J. Sledd.
· The worst terrorist attack since September 11 occurred on 12 October
at a resort in Bali, Indonesia, when a car bomb exploded in a busy
tourist area filled with nightclubs, cafes, and bars. The attack killed
over 200 persons from two-dozen nations. Seven US citizens died-Deborah
Lea Snodgrass, Karri Casner, Jacob Young, Steven Webster, George
"Joe" Milligan, Megan Heffernan, and Robert McCormick.
· One US citizen-Sandy Alan Booker-died in the Moscow theater attack on
23 October as Russian commandos attempted to rescue 800 hostages held
for three days by Chechen terrorists.
· On 28 October, a gunman in Amman, Jordan, shot and killed Laurence
Foley, a senior administrator of the US Agency for International
Development, as he was leaving his home for work.
· On 21 November in Sidon, Lebanon, an office manager/nurse at a
church-run health facility, US citizen Bonnie Denise Witherall, was
killed by a gunman.
· Three US citizens-Kathleen Gariety, William Koehn, and Martha
Myers-were murdered on 30 December by a gunman who stormed a Baptist
missionary hospital in Yemen and opened fire."
Given that Mr. Bush’s wars in the Middle East and Afghanistan have
actually increased the tempo of terror and its deadliness one would do
well to take a closer look at Afghanistan and further deceptions. From
the same report we find the following:
On Afghanistan
"In 2002, the Afghan people, supported by a US-led international
Coalition, decisively defeated the brutal Taliban regime, which had
provided sanctuary to terrorists and extremists from around the
world-including North America, Europe, Africa, the Middle East, and
Asia. The extremists had used Afghanistan as a training ground and base
of operations for worldwide terrorism. Senior al-Qaida leaders,
including Usama Bin Ladin-wanted by the United States for his role in
the September 11 attacks as well as the US Embassy bombings in Kenya and
Tanzania in 1998-had been based in Afghanistan, protected by the
Illegitimate Taliban regime....In July 2002, representatives from all
Afghan regions, factions, and ethnic groups met in an emergency "Loya
Jirga," to elect Hamid Karzai as the President of the Traditional
Islamic State of Afghanistan (TISA), which replaced the Afghan Interim
Administration established by the December 2001 Bonn Agreement. The new
Afghan Government has pledged its support for the war on terrorism. Al-Qaida,
which despite its setbacks still regards Afghanistan as a key
battlefield in its war against the United States, will continue its
armed opposition to the US presence, however. Al-Qaida has pockets of
fighters throughout Afghanistan and probably several more in the
neighboring tribal areas of Pakistan. To ensure that former Taliban and
al-Qaida holdouts do not reemerge as a significant threat, the TISA must
consolidate its support among the country’s rival ethnic and regional
factions."
First of all let us be clear. the so-called election of Harmid Karzai
was a sham: the two leaders who challenged Karzai in this election of
2002, by warlords, were told to "stand down" by our State
Department and not place their names on the ballot. Only Unocal's
consultant Harmid Karzai’s name was on it! He was the interim
government. The Traditional Islamic State of Afghanistan (TISA) which he
now heads is the very same as that, "which replaced the Afghan
Interim Administration established by the December 2001 Bonn
Agreement." Only the ill-informed, ignorant and Eric Hoffer’s
true-believers believe what Mr. Bush and Powell are passing off on the
rest of the world.
I’ll take each of the next statements one by one, (mine in
parentheses) directly from the report: "Afghans have already passed
several milestones on the road toward building a government in
accordance with the Bonn Agreement, and the most critical steps-such as
demobilizing rival militias, (This has not occurred at all as reported
continuously in the foreign press and particularly the Asian Times)...
"building a stable Afghan army," (There is no Afghan army and
Karzi’s mere existence is due to the US mercenaries from DynCorp
supplying 3,000 mercs to protect him round the clock: he cannot even
travel outside of Kabul and there have three attempts on his life
already)... "drafting a constitution, holding democratic elections,
and creating a legal system-were underway at the end of the year."
(There have been no elections and the drafting of the constitution and
creating a legal system are the efforts of primarily US officials).
"Afghanistan is a party to three of the 12 international
conventions and protocols relating to terrorism." (That is true.)
The real story of Afghanistan is told elsewhere and depicts something
less rosy. In the second of three recent pieces by the Asia Times titled
"Afghanistan: Launchpad for terror," By Syed Saleem Shahzad,
the report begins with Powell’s declarations from the report cited
above and the attendant press conferences:
"KARACHI - Even as US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld declared
this week in Kabul that an end to military operations in Afghanistan is
in sight, indications on the ground paint a somewhat different
picture....On a brief visit to the capital, Rumsfeld said that the ‘bulk
of the country is now secure ... we have concluded that we’re at a
point where we clearly have moved from major combat activity to a period
of stability and stabilization and reconstruction activities.’"
However, as reported in the Asia Times Online the country can expect
escalated guerrilla activity over the coming months. And further, the
International Islamic Front, a grouping of Usamah bin Laden’s al-Qaeda
and several other terrorist networks dedicated to jihad against America,
is increasingly using Afghanistan as a base.
Asia Times Online reportedly has learned that new cells are in place in
Afghanistan, Pakistan and the United Arab Emirates and they will be
responsible for carrying out attacks - including suicide attacks -
against United States interests in a number of regions. This will be the
new face of al-Qaeda, which will emerge soon with a new name and under
new command.... The US State Department confirmed on Thursday that new
attacks by al-Qaeda are likely, and that there is a danger that the
network and its Taliban backers will re-emerge in Afghanistan.
("http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Central_Asia/EE01Ag03.html") -
May 1)
In its annual report on global terrorism, the US agency also admitted
that militants were proving "resilient in the face of efforts by
East Asian nations to crush them, and every al-Qaeda operations officer
captured to date had been involved in some stage of preparation for a
terrorist attack at the time of arrest," the department said,
without giving details of where or when the attacks might occur.
"These threats must be regarded with utmost seriousness. Additional
attacks are likely," said the report.
In the past few months, a number of people like Khalid bin al-Atash have
entered Afghanistan, including from Palestine, Lebanon and Kashmir,
united in their desire to strike against American targets. The driver of
this new international brigade is the Egyptian Jamaat al-Jehad, led by
Dr Aiman al-Zawahiri, bin Laden's right hand man. (This group merged
with al-Qaeda, but it has an independent following in Egypt). In the
context of the war in Iraq, Jamaat's leaders have redirected the
energies of militants to concentrate purely on US targets, saying that
it is the real enemy. Aiman's whereabouts are unknown, but recent
reports have placed him in Yemen and Afghanistan. Wherever he is,
though, he is the mastermind behind restructuring the International
Islamic Front, given that al-Qaeda has been badly fractured. The
emphasis will be on small operations with a nexus of local groups, and
its main tool will be suicide attacks. This new face will be unveiled
sooner rather later, but it will be identified more by its actions than
by its name. (Source: Asia Times Online Co, Ltd., May 01, 2003)
Pakistani Interior Ministry spokesman announced the arrest of Khalid bin
al-Atash in Karachi, along with some Afghanis and one Pakistani. Asia
Times Online has reported on Khalid's movements ("http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Central_Asia/EE01Ag03.html"
)
"showing that the one-legged al-Qaeda operations chief was very
much back in business."
Despite the claims of the Interior Ministry, intelligence sources have
confirmed to Asia Times Online that Khalid was in fact arrested on
Tuesday near the Pakistan-Afghanistan border in Balochistan. Khalid was
said to be in the process of hiring local men to carry out an attack on
Jacobad’s Shehbaz airbase, which is used by the US Air Force. Khalid
was arrested by members of the US Federal Bureau of Investigation and
Pakistani law enforcers along with a few of his Afghani guards and a
Pakistani Baloch, who was to be involved in the attack on the airport.
According to Asia Times: On Wednesday, a Khalid was then taken to
Karachi, where he was revealed to the press. The reason for this was
that the Kabul government had recently made renewed charges of the
infiltration of terrorists into Afghanistan from the Balochistan border
areas, and the Pakistanis didn't want the arrest to lend credibility to
the accusations....Khalid has been connected to the Sheraton hotel bomb
blast in Karachi last year in which several French engineers were
killed. He had narrowly escaped arrest on several occasions, notably in
Karachi and Quetta. He recently entered Afghanistan and made some border
towns near Pakistan his base." (Ibid.)
Does this sound at all like the US Coalition forces have set the stage
for democracy in Afghanistan? Elections and that Karzai is in control?
Elsewhere the Asia Times reported Usamah bin Laden was back in Eastern
Afghanistan and buying weapons from the Chinese.
Iraq:
I shall move on to Iraq due to space requirements. We are regularly told
the war is over and "we" won. Never mind who this
"we" is. An interesting article was sent my way titled
"Female Fedayeen" By Chris Johnson. It begins with a typically
leftist "statement" but the content is very important:
"BAGHDAD - The Bush administration, U.S. soldiers, and the
mostly-male media have little or no knowledge of what Iraqi women think
about the invasion of their country. The views of some of these modern,
educated, outspoken Iraqi women may come as a big surprise. To begin
with, it's hard to know what women really think since many of them are
staying home amid the political chaos. They are not likely to be found
anywhere near the Palestine Hotel's island of security, available to
talk to journalists and soldiers. But it is unlikely that they will be
overjoyed at the prospect of being liberated from their burkhas a la
Afghanistan. Saddam Hussein, despite all his ills, gave these women many
of their rights three decades ago, making Iraq the relatively
progressive oasis of women's rights in a highly conservative and
repressive region. While the views of the vast majority of Iraqi women
remain a mystery, the dictator's rare generosity toward them may explain
why at least some of these women are plotting to oust what they call
American invaders in the name of their ‘liberator,’ Saddam Hussein.
...‘We love Saddam Hussein very much,’ says Arwa, 23, who was a
senior in chemical engineering at Baghdad University before it was
trashed by looters. ‘He was kind. We were safe, even when there were
wars. He gave opportunities to Iraqi women. Now every dream is broken.’"
(May 2, 2003)
The story goes on to report that "At their northern Baghdad home,
which features a Kalashnikov rifle under a mural of Chariots of Babylon,
Arwa and her female relatives, including internet-junkie Lubna, 16,
proudly show off photos of them training in the desert with revolvers
and machine guns to kill invading Americans. They say they are female
"fedayeen" or Saddam loyalists and members of all-girl units
of the Jaishil Kodus, a local branch of the Jerusalem Brigade of Islamic
Jihad, a Palestine-based terrorist group wanted by the Bush
administration...."..."The concept of female terrorists is
hardly a matter of idle rhetoric. As Arwa''''s mother proudly notes, two
female suicide bombers have already blown themselves up to kill American
soldiers in Iraq, while another woman with a rocket-propelled grenade
launcher destroyed an American tank in Nasiriyah. Female suicide bombers
have increasingly becoming more common in Palestine and Chechnya. When
about 50 Chechen terrorists stormed a Moscow theater and threatened to
blow up 800 hostages last year, 18 of them were women," the report
added.
The FBI is worried about Al Qaeda recruiting women, and recently issued
a be-on-the-lookout bulletin for a female Pakistani neurological expert
wanted for questioning in its terrorism investigation. Its analysts are
examining claims made in an Arab newspaper by an Arab woman who says
Usamah bin Laden asked her to establish training camps for "holy
warrior sisters." While recruiting women may be a new strategy for
Al-Qaeda, Arwa and her family say such training camps were the norm
during Saddam’s regime. They claim thousands of female students
regularly trained with army units during their summer school holidays,
according to Johnson. There are female student militias outside Iraq, as
well. "Kloot Saddam," an economics major living in Amman,
Jordan, vows to return to join the Iraqi resistance like the estimated
7,000 Iraqis who crossed the border during the U.S.-led bombing
campaign.
Johnson reported that, Originally from Basra, she first went to military
training camps at age 12. ‘Many girls train like this,’ she says.
‘It’s normal in Iraq.... We don’t want the American army walking
in our streets. We prefer death,’ says Arwa, ‘We must take them out
of here, over our dead bodies.’... Saddam wanted us to liberate
Palestinians from the Zionists, but now we must liberate ourselves from
Americans, and we'll do it, god willing. Women must do a plan.’
American soldiers, who recently showed journalists a stash of alleged
suicide bomber vests containing so-called ‘grape charges’ of mixed
nails and explosives, say suicide bombings and ‘drive by’ shootings
are their biggest threats. How great will the resistance to America is
summed up by Robert Fist on May 5, 2003, "When Iraqi civilians look
into the faces of American troops, President Bush famously told the
world on Thursday, "they see strength and kindness and
goodwill". Untrue, Mr. Bush. They see occupation."
The Hitler Saddam, at least in Mr. Bush’s rhetoric is not seen in
quite the same light as many Iraqis including women, Johnson reported
this significant dichotomy, "Centuries of vicious discrimination
against girls and women was ended by one stroke of the modernizing
dictator's pen," says Indian Parliament member, writer, and former
diplomat to Iraq Mani Shankar Aiyar, in a column for United Press
International. "The liberation of women has been the most dramatic
achievement of Saddam’s regime." Given opportunities in schools,
offices and the military unheard of in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, Arwa and
Lubna say their generation suspects that a post-war government of old
guard Iraqi exiles backed by the United States will push women back
behind the veil, like the mullahs who led Iran's Islamic Revolution. We
of course heard nothing of this prior to the invasion of the country by
American forces.
"America has come to control us, and control any fortune we have. I
can’t go out in the street because I see American soldiers walking
there. My uncles go out but we stay here all day, making food and
eating," she says. The signs for women’s future in the
post-Saddam Iraq are hardly encouraging thus far. ‘Iraqi women are
among the most educated in the Middle East and are capable of assuming
strong leadership roles,’ says Noeleen Heyzer, executive director of
the United Nations Development Fund for Women, or UNIFEM. ‘Yet we have
not seen clear evidence of a concerted effort to involve women in
discussions to establish a pathway to a democratic society.’ (Source:
Christopher Johnson. He is currently reporting from Baghdad.)
It is this set of growing anomalies, deceptions and what many
journalists the world over are calling outright lies, that is so
disturbing about Bush’s empire building. While I am hardly shocked by
these counter-stories being reported, I am very disappointed that our
own media has become so subservient as to become a mockery. As Robert
Fisk reported recently:
Donald Rumsfeld knows (and he has been told by US intelligence) that a
growing resistance movement to America’s occupation is gestating in
Iraq. The Shia Muslim community, now supported by thousands of Badr
Brigade Iraqis trained in Iran, believes the US is in Iraq for its oil.
It is furious at America’s treatment of Iraq’s citizens; in three
days last week at least 17 Sunni demonstrators were killed, two of them
less than 11 years old. And it is not impressed by Washington’s
attempts to cobble together an "interim" pro-American
government.(Source: dailytimes.com, and The Independent, May 05, 2003)
Now comes June 15, 2003 and every week American soldiers are being
killed and wounded by the growing guerrilla resistance in iraq, and not
just in Baghdad. Rumsfeld calls them subversives and other trite names
to cloud the truth: we are occupying Iraq not liberating anyone. He has
even suggested that Saddam's remnants are "paying" individuals
to attack US troops! Amazing!
We will not see the wars end in the Middle East any time soon; the
guerrilla activity against American occupying forces in Iraq and
Afghanistan will go on for as long as it takes for us to leave. Invade
Syria, Iran, support Israel further and allow the pipeline deal from
Iraq into Israel, and there will be no end in sight. Empire has its
costs, ask the British, Spain and Portugal: interesting it was these
three former empires who felt common cause with America’s newest
empire. Each a failed empire.
_____________________________
Craig B Hulet was Special Assistant to Congressman Jack Metcalf (ret.)
and is the author of the new book "The Hydra of Carnage: An
Analysis of the Objectives and Delusions of Empire."
www.artfulnuance.com Publishers, 2002 -- www.craigbhulet.com
Join our Daily News Headlines
Email Digest
|
|
Information
Clearing House
Daily News Headlines
Digest
|
HOME
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
|