The Stooge and the Statesman
By Christian B. Malaparte
Dear friends, the article by Christian
B. Malaparte, reprinted here with permission from The Voice
of Idaho, is an outstanding comparision of the American and
Russian presidents on the basis of their speeches to the UN
on September 28, 2015. The article could not be written more
truthfully. The unavoidable conclusion is that the United
States has no political leadership worthy of the name, and
Russia is overflowing with outstanding leadership. -
Paul Craig Roberts
October 15, 2015 "Information
Clearing House" - If your bubble has
burst, you can hardly listen to [Obama] through to the end. And if
you somehow succeed you will develop an increased awareness of his
deception. And of your own disgust.
Over 4,700 words that perfectly fit the narrative that the
mainstream media daily foist off on the public. Indeed MSM has
failed us all countless times, and though deception was revealed, no
retraction followed. Yet this man persists. Dour mug, focused eye, a
measured declaring, as of one who bears upon his shoulders
fathomless commitments – we had gotten used to it. Patently, there’s
an impressive number of people who actually believe [that the world
rests on America’s shoulders.]
If the U.S. weren’t sick with Corporatism, this man wouldn’t be on
that podium lying to us all. Advanced symptoms of the disease are
apparent, as corporations dominate nearly every aspect of society,
and government serves them as a tool to consolidate their power ever
further. A Corporate State has a Corporate Government, which enacts
Corporate Laws, pushes for a Corporate Economy, and then provides
Corporate Jobs (aka McJobs), Corporate Education, and Corporate
Healthcare to a Corporate Citizenry.
A Corporate State is a Corporation-ruled state.
In a Corporate State no one but a stooge will stand as President. No
matter whether in charge is a bubba from Arkansas, a sham cowboy, a
sissy black, or a warmongering harebrained bitch: a stooge bears no
responsibility. However indecent or heinous he might be, as long as
he’s doing his Corporate Bidding, he’ll brazenly beat the rap. The
rise of dissenting voices will remain offstage; unheard,
ineffective. A Corporate State holds power over the citizens through
the Corporate Media apparatus, which spreads scourge by shaping
Mesmerized by News channels and distracted by status quo-supporting
Hollywood paradigm, Corporate Citizenry firmly believes itself to be
free and safe, while shamelessly parroting events and statements it
was indoctrinated to, proudly saluting its flag, listening to and
thanking the Stooge-in-Chief.
At the UN General Assembly on September 28, U.S. President Barack
Obama praised the founding, 70 years ago, of the institution and its
achievements, acknowledging unparalleled advances in human liberty
and prosperity, diplomatic cooperation, a buttress to global
economy, and the lift of a billion people from poverty. Despite many
notches scored by the UN, his administration bypassed it entirely
when it was time to invade Libya, and is currently doing the same in
Syria, where it is bombing with no UN Security Council mandate or
invitation by the duly-elected government.
In his speech, Obama called Syrian President Bashar al-Assad a
tyrant who dropped barrel bombs on children, but the attacks in East
Ghouta on August 2013 shortly afterwards turned out to be a false
flag operation, with no shred of evidence against Syrian government
forces. Indeed, it was to serve as pretext for another U.S.
humanitarian invasion, but Russian warships were promptly deployed
off the Syrian coast. Obama said that a terrorist group beheads
captives, slaughters the innocent, and enslaves women. Those are the
moderate rebels that his administration funded, the CIA trained, and
its counterparts in the Mideast facilitated the rise, in order to
create a strategic asset to use for regime change in Syria. Assad is
fighting against them.
Obama purported to remind us how the Syrian mess began: “Assad
reacted to peaceful protests by escalating repression and killing
that, in turn, created the environment for the current strife.”
Before 2011, Syria was the only country in the Mideast with no
domestic conflicts. Assad had, and still has, the support of the
overwhelming majority of the population. The Syrian fake revolution
began with attacks during pro-government rallies perpetrated by
armed groups against demonstrators and police – the same plot as in
Libya and Ukraine. Operations were masterminded by Western
Intelligence services and triggered a civil war waged by the U.S.,
Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey, and Israel. The truth is Syria is the
only Mediterranean country with a state oil company and the only
Arab country not indebted to IMF. Here’s what created the
environment for a strife.
A truly frightening thing Obama said was, “We know that ISIL depends
on perpetual war to survive.” Truly scary for those whose bubble has
burst indeed, since they know that after WW2 in the U.S. even
Defense Industry merged with Corporatism – a Corporate Defense to
profit from war.
Likewise he referred to Gaddafi, without naming him, as a tyrant.
Gaddafi’s 40-year long rule turned Libya into the richest African
country, which provided its citizens free healthcare, free education
including University, free electricity, no interest loans,
exceptional welfare state, and much more. In addition to this,
Gaddafi was engaged in a project of de-dollarization in African
natural resources trade, and the creation of an African bank system
to free the continent from the clutches of Western corporations. A
good reason to make a tyrant out of him.
Amazingly, Obama claimed the military intervention prevented a
slaughter. Actually, it’s estimated that 30,000 Libyans were killed
by NATO and its rebels.
Then he recalled Russia’s annexation of Crimea, pointing out Russian
aggression in eastern Ukraine. Even Commander-in-Chief of theArmed
Forces of Ukraine General Viktor Muzhenko stated they have no
evidence of Russian troops on Ukrainian soil. French Intelligence
and the OSCE observers claimed the same. German Authorities revealed
that the ‘Russian invasion’ issue was an invention of U.S.
mainstream media. Yet still some idiots yack about it – the
Stooge-in-Chief along with them. Why does a referendum stir up
plenty of bile to Obama? Were the Crimeans to use firebombs and
batons, like the neo-Nazis in Kiev, to please him?
He went on to state that the U.S. has few economic interests in
Ukraine. Possibly it’s unknown to him that Hunter Biden, the cocaine
addict son of U.S. VP Joe Biden, is on the board of directors of a
company engaged in partnership with Shell in fracking (Hydraulic
Fracturing) in East Ukraine, aka Donbass? A 50-year production
sharing deal between Shell and Ukraine was signed on January 2013.
It’s worth $10 billion and is the largest foreign direct investment
ever for Ukraine. Then, why did Senator Insane McCain and other U.S.
and EU officials cheer up anti-government protesters in Kiev? By the
way, none of them appealed to the mob to eschew violence. And why
did Assistant Secretary of State V. Nuland discuss with U.S.
Ambassador G. Pyatt who should or shouldn’t be in the next Ukrainian
government? And most of all, why did puppet-president Poroshenko – a
CIA insider in Ukraine since 2006 – sign the law on Ukraine’s
abandonment of its non-aligned policy?
The Stooge said, “Imagine if Russia had engaged in true diplomacy.”
Let’s say, “Imagine if Russia had deployed some hundreds bases in
Mexico, Canada, and all over the Caribbean.”
He praised the Trans-Pacific Partnership, an agreement that will
open markets, while protecting the rights of workers. Of course, a
deal comparable to a gift to workers is way better to be negotiated
He blathered on about a nation of immigrants, international law,
Ebola, future generations, free media. Free media in a country where
six corporations control 90% of the media – is a Corporate State!
His administration has been brutal in targeting whistleblowers,
guilty of leaking real information to the press. A Pentagon
document, the Law of War Manual, states that journalists may be
treated like ‘unprivileged belligerents’, and allows the military to
detain and question them. World Press Freedom Index ranked the U.S.
at 49th place, lower than several African and South American
countries. Obama said, “You can jail your opponents, but you can’t
imprison ideas.” He should have said, “I can detain indefinitely
without trial, as well as torture, and kill whomever I please within
the U.S. and abroad.”
And again, “You can try to control access to information, but you
cannot turn a lie into truth.” Meanwhile his administration paid for
CNN content to run propaganda. Trumped-up stories were to look like
news and adverse ones were to be deleted – it was the Amber Lyon
He mentioned social media, but not to say that Facebook and Google,
along with U.S. spy agencies, are part of Big Brother, which
intercepts all data communication of Americans and the colonized
Europeans – including Merkel and Hollande.
Then, he rejected the wall to keep out migrants in Hungary – but the
one built by Israelis is cool, right? According to him, for 50 years
the U.S. pursued a Cuba policy that failed to improve the lives of
the Cubans. Improving lives by imposing an embargo, I wonder? What
an idea! Let’s say the U.S. is increasingly isolated in Latin
America, losing ground in favor of Russia, and this compelled him to
end hostile policies.
And again he said, “We can be patriotic without demonizing someone
else.” So, were those compliments, when addressing Assad, Putin,
Gaddafi? Lately, wasn’t he saying even Venezuela has turned into a
threat to American security? Wasn’t a Chinese aggression undergoing
in the South China Sea? After having violated the Constitution in
any possible way, he dared to cite George Washington! And more minor
gibberish, unsubstantiated claims likely ridiculous even to the
debt-bloated penpusher who wrote that filth on his behalf.
Obama’s speech included just a couple of sentences not to be labeled
as pitiful lies. It was about Iran: “The Iranian people have a proud
history, and are filled with extraordinary potential. But chanting
Death to America does not create jobs, or make Iran more secure.”
True. Neither do sanctions create jobs. Nor does surrounding Iran
with U.S. military bases make it secure. By the way, how many jobs
were created by chanting Death to Gaddafi? And has that made Libya
Iran has never owned nukes. Sanctions were imposed against them to
harm a competitor rich in resources and noncompliant with a
U.S.-vetted government in office, and they were lifted because
circumstances were changing to its benefit: with or without their
removal, Russia, China, and even the EU were to re-engage Iran.
Drawing to a close, Obama found a way to insert a veiled threat:
“Catastrophes, like what we are seeing in Syria, do not take place
in countries where there is genuine democracy and respect for the
universal values this institution is supposed to defend.”
It means any country whose government from the Western point of view
is not deemed democratic, aka neoliberal/pro-U.S., runs the risk of
facing violent uprisings and a raise of terrorist formations aiming
at overthrowing the government in office. It’s the export of colored
revolutions, a destabilize/invade/plunder program sponsored by the
U.S. State Department.
By the end of a self-complacent, [self-]damning, lengthy
performance, the message handed over was: all in all, the Good Guys
have done a good job, and American exceptionalism is here to stay.
“We can no longer tolerate the current state of affairs in the
These words bashed [the UN] audience into a fraught silence. Russian
President Vladimir Putin put matters straight in 23 minutes and
nailed whomever it may concern to their responsibilities without
having to mention [their names].
Policies perpetrated by a sole center of dominance, based on
conviction in its exceptionalism and impunity, may lead to the
collapse of international relations, and give rise to a world ruled
by selfishness rather than collective effort, by dictate rather than
equality and liberty, with protectorates controlled from outside
rather than independent states.
No nation should be forced to conform to a single development model
that somebody has declared the right one. Still, some prefer to
export so-called “democratic” revolutions. In the Mideast and North
Africa, the unleashed violence has destroyed government institutions
and local lifestyle, bringing about poverty, social disaster, and
total disregard for human rights, including the right to life.
“I’m urged to ask those who created this situation: do you at least
realize now what you’ve done?”
Vacuums of power resulted in the emergence of areas of anarchy,
quickly filled with extremists and terrorists. Members of the
so-called ‘moderate’ Syrian opposition get arms and training by the
West, then defect to the Islamic State, which does not come from
nowhere, for it was initially developed as a weapon against
‘undesirable’ secular regimes. It’s hypocritical and irresponsible
to warn against the threat of terrorism and then turn a blind eye to
its funding channels.
Stop playing games with terrorists to achieve political goals.
Create a broad anti-terrorism coalition based on UN Charter. Fix the
Mideast to fix the refugee crisis. Restore statehood in Libya,
strengthen government institutions in Iraq, provide comprehensive
assistance to the legitimate government of Syria – President Assad’s
troops along with Kurdish militia are the only forces truly fighting
terrorists in Syria. Any assistance to sovereign nations is to be
offered rather than imposed, in strict compliance with the UN
It’s been NATO expansionism to Post-Soviet countries to spark off a
major geo-political crisis in Ukraine. Sole way out of the dead end
is full implementation of the Minsk agreement. No integrity can be
ensured by threats or military force, and the rights and choices of
Donbass citizens must be respected.
Unilaterally imposed sanctions circumventing the UN Charter serve
political objectives and aim to eliminate market competition.
Trade rules are to be discussed within the framework of the United
Nations, the WTO, and the G20, not rewritten behind closed doors to
accommodate the interests of a privileged few.
Once [Putin’s] speech was over, it was clear who was in charge.
While Obama delivered the crude, deceptive propaganda to the
assembly, Putin presented a stark foreign policy agenda, and
eventually stood up as the man to take over and put an end to chaos.
Putin has faced terrorism all his political career long. He fixed
Dagestan. He fixed Chechnya. He fixed South-Ossetia. He’s got skills
to fix Syria and Iraq as well.
When he rose to power, Russia was falling apart after the disastrous
policies of the [alcohol] soaked-puppet Yeltsin, with no real
budget, rampant inflation, low foreign exchange reserves, high crime
rate and unemployment, public asset looted by foreign companies and
crook oligarchs, and deeply indebted. Fifteen years after, Putin has
re-built the country into a superpower reasserting its stance on the
global political chessboard, leading major trade partnerships and an
impressive military. This makes him a true Statesman.