Tony Benn 1992 Speech: Labour MP's Address to Commons about
Britain's Wars in the Middle East
His son is due to lead the pro-war argument in the Labour party
By Jon Stone
A speech by late Labour MP Tony Benn about the alleged double
standards of British policy in the Middle East is being shared on
social media ahead of a parliamentary debate on bombing Syria
tomorrow.
Mr Benn, whose son Hilary Benn is due to make the pro-war position
for Labour, against the views of the party’s leader Jeremy Corbyn,
criticised the UK’s record in the region after the start of the
first Gulf War.
“We have forgotten that the story is part of an unhappy record of
British relations in the middle east,” he told MPs in the debate,
which occurred over 23 years ago on 23 November 1992.
“The double standards of British policy in the middle east will be
noticed by anyone in the Arab world who reads the report of today's
debate. We did not take the same view as we took about Kuwait when
Turkey invaded Cyprus or when the occupied territories were taken
over by Israel.”
“Considered in the light of what we now know, the Gulf war is seen
to be a war for profit, oil and control of the region.
“Now we are suddenly told that the Ministers, who so vigorously
protested their defence of democracy and human rights, were selling
weapons to Sadam Hussein who was represssing Kurds and Shi'ites
before and after the war. Those Ministers then said that it was
merely a matter of flexible guidelines.”
In 1991 the US and UK invaded Iraq after its dictator Saddam
Hussein, who the UK and US had previously armed, invaded Kuwait.
In 2015, the Government has come under criticism from human rights
groups for its alliance with Saudi Arabia, where crimes such as
converting away from Islam are still punishable by beheading.
It is unacceptable to slander, smear or engage in personal attacks on authors of articles posted on ICH.
Those engaging in that behavior will be banned from the comment section.
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)