Donald Trump Tells Pro-Israel Crowd He
Can’t Be Bought, Gets Booed
By Zaid Jilani
December 04, 2015 "Information
Clearing House" - "The
Intercept" -
- Speaking to the Republican Jewish
Coalition on Thursday, Donald Trump once again demonstrated
how he is not your typical presidential candidate.
“You’re not going to support me because I
don’t want your money,” Trump told members of the
Sheldon Adelson-funded hardline pro-Israel lobbying
organization.
He went on to mock rival Jeb Bush for
taking money from interest groups and then toeing their
line. “That’s why you don’t want to give me money, OK, but
that’s OK, you want to control your own politician. That’s
fine, good,” he concluded.
And then, unlike the candidates who do
want the coalition’s money, Trump broke with GOP orthodoxy,
questioning Israel’s commitment to peace, calling for even
treatment in Israeli-Palestinian deal-making, and refusing
to call for Jerusalem to be Israel’s undivided capital —
provoking a wave of boos from the audience.
Trump was asked about
earlier comments he had made to an Associated Press
reporter that he believes peace hinges on “whether or not
Israel wants to make the deal — whether or not Israel’s
willing to sacrifice certain things.”
Trump
was quickly assailed after that comment by rival
candidate Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., who argued that land
rights and a peace deal were not the issue and that Trump
shouldn’t “question Israel’s commitment to peace.”
Trump continued to take a considerably
more even-handed approach to the issue than his rivals at
the event on Thursday. “I said that you have to have a
commitment to make [peace]. I don’t know that Israel has the
commitment to make it. I don’t know that the other side has
the commitment to make it,” he said.
“I’d like to go in with a clean slate, and
just say, ‘Let’s go, everybody’s even, we love everybody and
let’s see if we can do something.’”
The moderator tried to pin Trump down on
the litmus-test issue of whether Jerusalem should be the
undivided capital of Israel.
“You know what I want to do, I want to
wait until I meet with Bi —” started Trump before he was
interrupted by booing.
“Who’s the wise guy?” Trump asked. “Do me
a favor, just relax, OK. You’ll like me very much, believe
me, and you wonder why you get yourself in trouble.”
Trump continued to heckle his heckler:
“You can’t go in with that attitude. If you’re going to make
a deal, you could make a great deal, you can’t go in with
the attitude we’re going to shove it down your — you gotta
go in and get it and do it nicely so everyone is happy.”
In other words, to Trump, who prides
himself on deal-making, it’s simply obvious that you can’t
make a deal between two people if you start off by saying
one of them always gets their way no matter what.
Trump’s comments on refusing to take RJC
money start around the 17-minute mark, and the testy
question-and-answer period begins about 20 minutes in.
Trump praised Israeli leader Benjamin
Netanyahu and criticized the nuclear deal with Iran, and he
got a laugh out of the crowd when he said, “Look, I’m a
negotiator like you folks; we’re negotiators.”
But his call for parity in dealing with
the Israeli-Palestinian conflict made his rhetoric rare
among recent presidential contenders.
Refusing to call for an undivided
Jerusalem is almost unheard of— even among Democrats.
Although presidential candidates typically
adopt that position during their campaigns, they abandon
it when in government.
Every administration, Republican and Democrat, has used
a waiver to avoid compliance with the 1995 Jerusalem Embassy
Relocation Act, arguing that it would harm the peace process
and thus U.S. national security.
It is unacceptable to slander, smear or engage in personal attacks on authors of articles posted on ICH.
Those engaging in that behavior will be banned from the comment section.
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)