The
Know-nothing American Media
By William
Blum
January 10,
2016 "Information
Clearing House"
- Vulgar, crude, racist and ultra-sexist though he
is, Donald Trump can still see how awful the
American mainstream media is.
I think one
of the main reasons for Donald Trump’s popularity is
that he says what’s on his mind and he means what he
says, something rather rare amongst American
politicians, or politicians perhaps anywhere in the
world. The American public is sick and tired of the
phoney, hypocritical answers given by office holders
of all kinds. When I read that Trump had said that
Senator John McCain was not a hero because McCain
had been captured in Vietnam, I had to pause for
reflection. Wow! Next the man will be saying that
not every American soldier who was in the military
in Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq was a shining hero
worthy of constant media honor and adulation.
When Trump
was interviewed by ABC-TV host George
Stephanopoulos, former aide to President Bill
Clinton, he was asked: “When you were pressed about
[Russian president Vladimir Putin’s] killing of
journalists, you said, ‘I think our country does
plenty of killing too.’ What were you thinking about
there? What killing sanctioned by the U.S.
government is like killing journalists?”
Trump
responded: “In all fairness to Putin, you’re saying
he killed people. I haven’t seen that. I don’t know
that he has. Have you been able to prove that? Do
you know the names of the reporters that he’s
killed? Because I’ve been – you know, you’ve been
hearing this, but I haven’t seen the name. Now, I
think it would be despicable if that took place, but
I haven’t seen any evidence that he killed anybody
in terms of reporters.”
Or Trump
could have given Stephanopoulos a veritable heart
attack by declaring that the American military, in
the course of its wars in recent decades, has been
responsible for the deliberate deaths of many
journalists. In Iraq, for example, there’s the
Wikileaks 2007 video, exposed by Chelsea Manning, of
the cold-blooded murder of two Reuters
journalists; the 2003 US air-to-surface missile
attack on the offices of Al Jazeera in
Baghdad that left three journalists dead and four
wounded; and the American firing on Baghdad’s Hotel
Palestine the same year that killed two foreign news
cameramen.
It was
during this exchange that Stephanopoulos allowed the
following to pass his lips: “But what killing has
the United States government done?”
Do the
American TV networks not give any kind of
intellectual test to their newscasters? Something at
a fourth-grade level might improve matters.
Prominent
MSNBC newscaster Joe Scarborough, interviewing
Trump, was also baffled by Trump’s embrace of Putin,
who had praised Trump as being “bright and
talented”. Putin, said Scarborough, was “also a
person who kills journalists, political opponents,
and invades countries. Obviously that would be a
concern, would it not?”
Putin
“invades countries” … Well, now there even I would
have been at a loss as to how to respond. Try as I
might I don’t think I could have thought of any
countries the United States has ever invaded.
To his
credit, Trump responded: “I think our country does
plenty of killing, also, Joe, so, you know. There’s
a lot of stupidity going on in the world right now,
Joe. A lot of killing going on. A lot of stupidity.
And that’s the way it is.”
As to Putin
killing political opponents, this too would normally
go unchallenged in the American mainstream media.
But earlier this year in this report I listed seven
highly questionable deaths of opponents of the
Ukraine government, a regime put in power by the
United States, which is used as a club against
Putin.
This of course
was non-news in the American media.
So that’s
what happens when the know-nothing American media
meets up with a know-just-a-bit-more presidential
candidate. Ain’t democracy wonderful?
Trump has
also been criticized for saying that immediately
after the 9-11 attacks, thousands of Middle
Easterners were seen celebrating outdoors in New
Jersey in sight of the attack location. An absurd
remark, for which Trump has been rightfully
vilified; but not as absurd as the US mainstream
media pretending that it had no idea what Trump
could possibly be referring to in his mixed-up
manner.
For there
were in fact people seen in New Jersey apparently
celebrating the planes crashing into the World Trade
Center towers. But they were Israelis, which would
explain all one needs to know about why the story
wasn’t in the headlines and has since been
“forgotten” or misremembered. On the day of the 9-11
attacks, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
was asked what the attacks would mean for US-Israeli
relations. His quick reply was: “It’s very good. …
Well, it’s not good, but it will generate immediate
sympathy (for Israel).” There’s a lot on the
Internet about these Israelis in New Jersey, who
were held in police custody for months before being
released.
So here too
mainstream newspersons do not know enough to
enlighten their audience.
Russia, as explained to Russians
by Americans
There is a
Russian
website [inosmi = foreign mass media] that
translates propagandistic russophobic articles from
the western media into Russian and publishes them so
that Russians can see with their own eyes how the
Western media lies about them day after day. There
have been several articles lately based on polls
that show that anti-western sentiments are
increasing in Russia, and blaming it on “Putin’s
propaganda”.
This is
rather odd because who needs propaganda when the
Russians can read the Western media themselves and
see firsthand all the lies it puts forth about them
and the demonizing of Putin. There are several
political-debate shows on Russian television where
they invite Western journalists or politicians; on
one there frequently is a really funny American
journalist, Michael Bohm, who keeps regurgitating
all the western propaganda, arguing with his Russian
counterparts. It’s pretty surreal to watch him
display the worst political stereotypes of
Americans: arrogant, gullible, and ignorant. He
stands there and lectures high ranking Russian
politicians, “explaining” to them the “real” Russian
foreign policy, and the “real” intentions behind
their actions, as opposed to anything they say. The
man is shockingly irony-impaired. It is as funny to
watch as it is sad and scary.
The above
was written with the help of a woman who was raised
in the Soviet Union and now lives in Washington. She
and I have discussed US foreign policy on many
occasions. We are in very close agreement as to its
destructiveness and absurdity.
Just as in
the first Cold War, one of the basic problems is
that Exceptional Americans have great difficulty in
believing that Russians mean well. Apropos this, I’d
like to recall the following written about George
Kennan:
Crossing Poland with the first US diplomatic
mission to the Soviet Union in the winter of
1933, a young American diplomat named George
Kennan was somewhat astonished to hear the
Soviet escort, Foreign Minister Maxim Litvinov,
reminisce about growing up in a village nearby,
about the books he had read and his dreams as a
small boy of being a librarian.
“We
suddenly realized, or at least I did, that these
people we were dealing with were human beings
like ourselves,” Kennan wrote, “that they had
been born somewhere, that they had their
childhood ambitions as we had. It seemed for a
brief moment we could break through and embrace
these people.”
It hasn’t
happened yet.
Kennan’s
sudden realization brings George Orwell to mind: “We
have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of
the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men.”
Holocaust Deniers
It’s easier
to deny the existence of God than to deny the
existence of certain aspects of the Holocaust. And
not as dangerous. In Europe “denying the Holocaust”
is illegal in 14 countries.
Ken
Meyercord, who lives in Virginia, has long been a
researcher of this phenomenon. He writes that the
debate over the Holocaust boils down to three
principal issues:
- How
many died?
- Was
the “Final Solution” really an extermination
plan or was it a plan to deport Europe’s Jews?
- Were
there actually gas chambers?
He’s
prepared an 11-page e-pamphlet on the subject, “Did
the Holocaust really happen the way we’ve been
told?” It can be obtained by emailing iconohead@gmail.com.
It’s a good
thing the United States doesn’t have a law against
reporting on the American Holocaust. I’d have been
put away long ago, for the sum total of US foreign
policy can well be described by that infamous word
beginning with an “H”; indeed, my first website
carried the name “American Holocaust”.
However, in
California there is now a proposed ballot initiative
which would restrict “Holocaust Denial”. The
Holocaust Denial Speech Restrictions Initiative
(#15-0073) is an initiated constitutional amendment
proposed for the California ballot on November 8,
2016. The measure would prohibit any speech in any
state-funded school, museum or educational
institution that claims Jewish, Armenian or
Ukrainian Holocausts did not exist. It would also
prohibit Holocaust denial organizations from
distributing information or conducting activities at
these state-funded locations.
In case
you’re wondering what the Ukrainian Holocaust was,
it’s something left over from the Cold War – charges
of widespread famine caused by the Soviet Union
amongst the people of Ukraine. But I believe that
such charges must be approached with some caution,
given, amongst other reasons, the documented
campaign by the Hearst Press in the United States to
squeeze out every drop of anti-communist blood they
could from the historical events. You can read about
this in a book by Douglas Tottle, “Fraud, Famine and
Fascism: The Ukrainian Genocide Myth From Hitler to
Harvard” (1987), available free online.
Notes
Copyright William Blum
http://williamblum.org/aer/read/142 |