Putin Is The Only Leader The West Has
A Reuters news
under the names of presstitutes Robin Emmott and
Sabine Siebold shows how devoid the West is of
honest, intelligent and responsible journalists and
will examine the dishonesty or incompetence of the
reporters and then that of Western government
Siebold describe NATO as a “Western defense
alliance.” Since the Clinton regime NATO has been an
alliance for waging offensive war, a war crime under
the Nuremberg rules established by the United
States. Under the NATO banner a number of countries
have been bombed, invaded, and had their governments
overthrown by Washington acting under the cover of
destroyed countries posed no threat whatsoever to
the countries of the NATO alliance and undertook no
aggressive actions against NATO members. How is it
possible that Reuters’ reporters and editors are not
aware of this? Why do they call an instrument of
Washington’s aggression a “defense alliance”?
Siebold report that “Russian aggression” is the
reason NATO is deploying 3,000 to 4,000 troops in
the Baltic states and Poland. In other words,
something that does not exist–Russian aggression
toward the Baltics and Poland–is assumed to be a
fact that must be countered with military
reporters do not question whether this insignificant
number of NATO troops constitutes a defense or a
provocation. The number of troops would have to be
100 times greater before the force even begins to
approach a defensive force. What then is the purpose
of the 3,000 or 4,000 NATO troops?
informed person knows that there is no need of a
defense force against Russia in the Baltics and
Poland. Aside from this fact, only an absolute idiot
could think that three or four thousand troops
constitutes a defense against the Russian Army. In
June 1941 Operation Barbarossa hit Russia with an
invasion of four million troops, the
majority German component of which were probably the
most highly trained and disciplined troops in
military history, excepting only the Spartans. By
the time that the Americans and British got around
to the Normandy invasion, the Russian Army had
chewed up the Wehrmacht. There were only a few
divisions at 40% strength to resist the Normandy
invasion. By the time the Russian Army got to
Berlin, the German resistance consisted of armed
reporters raise no question about President Obama’s
statement that 1,000 of this insignificant force
will be Americans in order “to enhance our forward
presence in central and eastern Europe.” Why does
the United States need a “forward presence” in
central and eastern Europe? What does a US “forward
presence” in central and eastern Europe represent
except an insane recklessness? One thousand US
troops are good for nothing except a provocation.
Siebold report with a straight face without laughter
or question unverifiable accusations of Russian
aggression by White House Deputy National Security
Adviser Ben Rhodes, Polish Foreign Minister Witold
Waszczykowski, President Obama, and head of NATO’s
military committee, Czech General Petr Pavel.
“said Russia was attempting to restore its status as
a world power, an effort that included using its
it is necessary to “keep sanctions on Moscow in
place until it fully complies with the ceasefire
agreement in Ukraine.”
Waszczykowski said: “We have to reject any type of
wishful thinking with regard to pragmatic
cooperation with Russia as long as Russia keeps on
invading its neighbors.”
threatened Russia with a NATO response to Russia’s
statements are propagandistic. If those who made the
statements actually believe them, they are too
imbecilic to be trusted with public offices.
possible that the Czech general does not know that
Russia has used its military only to repel a
Washington-inspired Georgian invasion of South
Ossetia and against ISIS in Syria, which the US, UK,
and France also claim to be doing? After repelling
the Georgian invasion, Russia withdrew its forces.
After dealing ISIS a setback in Syria, Russia
withdrew and was forced to return by Washington’s
resupply of ISIS.
Polish Foreign Minister identify the countries that
“Russia keeps on invading”?
President of the United States really not know that
Russia is not a party to the ceasefire agreement in
Ukraine? This is an agreement between the breakaway
republics and the government in Kiev. Washington has
done everything possible to discourage Kiev from
keeping the agreement Kiev signed.
National Security Adviser Rhodes tell us where
“continued aggression by Russia” is occurring? What
countries are being invaded and overrun?
can there be so much Russian aggression and no
evidence of it?
President Putin dressed down to their faces the
Western media whores who are fanning the flames of
World War III by repeating without question
Washington’s propagandistic lies. These lies are
reckless. They endanger all life on planet Earth.
lifetime, American presidents worked to reduce
tensions between the two major nuclear powers. JFK
worked with Khrushchev to defuse the dangerous
situation arising from the placement of US missiles
in Turkey and, in response, the placement of Russian
missiles in Cuba.
Nixon brought forth SALT I, the strategic arms
limitation treaty, and the ABM Treaty.
Carter crafted SALT II.
Reagan negotiated with Gorbachev the end of the Cold
War, the most promising achievement of the 20th
Clinton, George W. Bush, and Obama regimes have done
everything possible to raise the tensions between
nuclear powers to heights beyond those of the most
dangerous days of the Cold War.
Clinton regime broke the word of the government of
the United States, thereby destroying the honor
of the US government, by taking NATO to
George W. Bush regime pulled the US out of the ABM
Treaty and rewrote US war doctrine in order to
elevate nuclear weapons from a retaliatory weapon to
a first strike weapon. This insane act put
the Russians on notice.
Obama regime intends to place nuclear missiles on
Russia’s borders in Poland and Romania and
engineered a coup in Ukraine with the intent of
depriving Russia of its Black Sea naval base in
Crimea, Russia’s only warm water port.
a Russophobic Washington-installed government in
Ukraine, the Russian population in Crimea, a Russian
province since the 1700s, voted practically
unanimously to rejoin Russia, where Crimea had
resided until Khrushchev reassigned the Russian
province to Ukraine in the mid 20th century. The
Russian government’s acceptance of the wishes of its
own people were propagandistically misrepresented by
Washington and the presstitutes as “Russian invasion
and annexation of Crimea.” This lie is where the
myth of “Russian invasion” came from. Russian
military forces were already present in Crimea,
because when Russia granted independence to Ukraine,
Russia retained a long-term lease on the Russian
naval base in Crimea. As all international observers
testified, the vote was independent of the Russian
House Fool said that the vote in Crimea was
meaningless because all of Ukraine did not get to
vote. The Fool was too ignorant to know that by this
laughable charge he discredited the American
Revolution because the British people didn’t get to
vote. For the precise same reason that The Fool
wants Crimea returned to Kiev, the US must be
returned to Britain. I doubt that the British would
have us. Who wants a war criminal nation drowning in
its own hubris?
is now faced with the prospect that insouciant
Americans will elect a crazed and incompetent
criminal or semi-criminal as their president, a
person who has declared the President of Russia to
be “the new Hitler.” The stupid bitch’s statement
is a declaration of nuclear war, and this
dangerous, reckless, incompetent, careless person
has been selected by the Democratic Party as the
next POTUS !!!
ignorance and stupidity of the American people will
destroy the world.
wonder that Vladimir Putin, the only responsible
world leader other than the president of China, is
desperate that the Western media understand that
their irresponsible negligence to the truth is
helping Washington drive the world to nuclear war.
does not want war. He is doing everything in his
power to avoid it. But Putin is not going to
surrender Russia to Washington. The trip-point of
World War III will be the installation of
Washington’s missiles in Poland and Romania. As
Putin recently made clear to the imbecilic Western
journalists, these missiles can easily and secretly
be changed from anti-ballistic missiles to nuclear
attack missiles that can strike their Russian
targets within 5 or fewer minutes of launch, thus
depriving Russia of its retaliatory deterrent.
Once these missiles are in place, Washington can
issue orders to Russia.
the evil men and women in Washington who are
gambling with the life of the planet think, Russia
is not going to accept these missiles.
world leadership reside? In Washington, the war
criminal capital of the world that is driving the
world to nuclear war, or in Russia whose leadership
accepts countless affronts and provocations in an
effort to avoid war?
Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary
of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate
editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist
for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and
Creators Syndicate. He has had many university
appointments. His internet columns have attracted a
worldwide following. Roberts' latest books are
of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution
of the West,
Neoconservative Threat to World Order.