main plan is to capture more land
10/17/03: (Gulf News) Israel's Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and his
friends in Washington are in a hurry. They are racing to achieve their
objectives before anyone stops them. And when they are in a hurry, they
are particularly dangerous. Syria and Iran are in their sights, with
further down the road Saudi Arabia, and even Egypt. Political and
economic pressure, financial penalties, sanctions, intervention, regime
change by military force, these are their chosen instruments for bending
the Arabs to the will of Israel and its United States patron.
Sharon's main objective is the building of a Greater Israel on the ruins
of Palestinian nationalism. His latest instrument is the wall or fence
which is imprisoning the Palestinians on a fraction of their territory,
cutting them off on all sides from contact with their Arab neighbours.
The wall is due to be finished in eight months' time. Sharon is
determined that nothing must prevent its completion.
At the UN Security Council this week, he won a major victory when the
United States vetoed a resolution, proposed by Syria, condemning the
wall. Within hours, a radical Palestinian group attacked the motorcade
of an American delegation in Gaza, killing three Americans and wounding
a fourth. Sharon will no doubt exploit this latest incident to rally
American opinion against the beleaguered Palestinian president, Yasser
Israel's main worry
Sharon's main worry, however, and the reason for his haste, is that
George W Bush could be thrown out of office at next year's US
presidential election - and with him the whole band of pro-Israeli
"neo-conservatives" which have set the Administration's agenda
since September 11, 2001. These are the men who pressed for war against
Iraq as a first step towards reshaping the geopolitics of the entire
Middle East. But the sluggish US economy, the mess in Iraq, and the
anti-American anger sweeping the Arab and Muslim world are now making
Bush look vulnerable. A Democrat in the White House may not be so
tolerant of Israel's foolhardy ambitions or so ready to endorse the
neo-cons' aggressive policies.
Sharon has other worries closer to home. The political fall-out from the
current police investigations of his two sons, Omri and Gilad, for
alleged sharp practice and bribe-taking could drive Sharon himself from
office in 2004. And to compound his fears, the Israeli Left which for
the past two years has seemed terminally ill and politically irrelevant
is showing faint signs of revival.
Leading opposition figures such as Yossi Beilin, Amram Mitzna and
Avraham Burg have joined with Palestinian moderates, led by Yasser Abed
Rabbo, in drafting a detailed peace plan for a two-state solution - the
so-called Geneva Accords.
The plan, the result of two years of secret negotiations funded by the
Swiss government, is due to be signed formally in Geneva next month,
putting flesh on the bones of the tentative agreements reached at Taba
in January 2001.
It represents everything that Sharon and his friends detest and which he
has spent his life seeking to destroy. It provides for an Israeli
withdrawal to the 1967 borders (with some marginal modifications) to
allow for the emergence of a viable Palestinian state; some major
colonies close to the Green Line to be annexed to Israel but those deep
inside Palestinian territory to be evacuated; Jerusalem as a shared
capital; Palestinian sovereignty over the Haram Al Sharif; Israeli
sovereignty over the Wailing Wall and the Jewish quarter of the Old
City; and - a major Palestinian concession - the abandonment of the
"right of return" to towns and villages lost in 1948. An
international force would monitor implementation of the plan while
radical Palestinian groups would be tamed and shut down.
These "Geneva Accords" may, in the present climate, seem
hopelessly utopian. They have no chance whatsoever of being implemented
while the Sharon government, or anything resembling it, is in power.
Their potential importance, however, lies in offering the Israeli public
what it lacks and longs for most - hope that the current nightmare of
killing and counter-killing can be brought to an end. In other words, a
change in Washington, and a move back to the center by an Israeli public
won over by a credible peace plan, could yet pose a threat to Sharon's
He has reacted to the Geneva Accords with barely suppressed rage.
"By what right," he snorted, "are left-wing people
proposing moves that Israel can never do, nor will ever do!"
Sharon has always wanted one hundred per cent of Palestine, an ambition
which would have involved expelling most, if not all, of the Palestinian
population of the West Bank to Jordan, which would then have become a
As the obstacles to such a project are formidable, Sharon has opted for
something a shade more modest: the seizure of about 90 per cent of
historic Palestine, confining the Palestinians to some 10 per cent of
the overall territory behind the notorious wall.
No doubt he calculates that, once the wall is finished, it will in due
course come to be accepted by the international community, and by the
Palestinians themselves, as defining Israel's borders. Hence, his
determination, and that of his American supporters, to move ahead with
all possible speed while the regional and international environment is
in their favour.
Sharon's major asset is Bush. Backing off from engagement in the
Arab-Israeli conflict, the Bush administration appears to have decided
to leave Israel to manage the Palestine problem on its own terms.
So much is clear from its veto of UN Resolutions condemning the wall and
Sharon's recent strike inside Syrian territory, from its silence over
continued settlement expansion and from its failure to react to Israel's
massive destruction of Palestinian property at Rafah, on Gaza's border
with Egypt, which this week left 1,500 Palestinians homeless. As he
nervously prepares for his election campaign, his ratings slipping in
the polls, Bush's collapse before Sharon must be judged one of the
blackest pages in recent American history. It has provoked incredulity
in Europe and, more ominously, bitter hatred of the United States in
Muslim communities around the world.
Yet, Sharon has much cause for satisfaction: while Israel faces no
strategic threat, its enemies tremble. A shattered Iraq is under
American occupation; Iran, facing great international pressure over its
alleged nuclear weapons programme, is wracked by internal conflicts
between conservatives and reformers; the Arab Gulf, seemingly
indifferent and content, lies under America's military umbrella; Egypt,
neutralised by its peace treaty with Israel and by America's annual
subsidy, hardly dares open its mouth in defence of the Palestinians;
while Syria faces harsh and threatening pressure on all sides - from
Washington, now preparing to vote into law the economic and diplomatic
boycotts enshrined in the Syria Accountability Act; and from Israel,
which last week sent its planes to strike at Syria and seems ready to do
Sharon still thinks he can bludgeon the Palestinians into submission.
The attack on the Palestinian camp near Damascus, together with Israel's
repeated incursions at Rafah, are clearly intended as warnings to Syria
and Egypt to halt all support for the Palestinians - or face the
But Sharon has not yet found an answer to the suicide bombers who have
traumatised the Israel public, ruined the economy, killed the tourist
trade and cut off foreign investment.
They are a profound embarrassment to Sharon, but he may think it a price
worth paying. His priority is land, not security. That, he believes,
will follow once the wall is built and the Palestinians surrender.
Patrick Seale is an eminent commentator and the author of several books
on Middle East affairs. The writer can be contacted at: firstname.lastname@example.org
Join our Daily News Headlines
Daily News Headlines