| Spy Scandal's Roots are Deep
Juan Cole
09/01/04 --Jim Lobe argues that
the FBI investigation that caught up Pentagon Iran expert
Lawrence Franklin is much wider than initially thought, and
focuses on the unauthorized transfer to Israel of highly
sophisticated military software and designs. Since many Israeli
arms merchants connected to the government in Tel Aviv sell to
the black market, some of this military technology has ended up
in the hands of countries that have poor relations with the US,
and some may have ultimately been resold to al-Qaeda.
Lobe writes,
According to knowledgeable sources, who asked to not be
identified, the FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation) has been
intensively reviewing a series of past counter-intelligence
probes that were started against several high-profile neo-cons
but never followed up with prosecutions, to the great
frustration of counter-intelligence officers, in some cases.
Some of these past investigations involve top current
officials, including Deputy Secretary of Defence Paul
Wolfowitz; Undersecretary of Defence for Policy Douglas Feith,
whose office appears to be the focus of the most recently
disclosed inquiry; and Richard Perle, who resigned as Defence
Policy Board (DPB) chairman last year.
All three were the subject of a lengthy investigative story by
Stephen Green published by Counterpunch in February. Green is
the author of two books on U.S.-Israeli relations, including
Taking Sides: America's Secret Relations with a Militant
Israel, which relies heavily on interviews with former
Pentagon and counter-intelligence officials.
Meanwhile, The
Jerusalem Post reports that the FBI raided the offices of
Steve Rosen, the director of foreign policy issues for the
American Israel Public Affairs Committe, an enormously
influential lobby.
Earlier, rumors swirled of an FBI investigation of how the
Pentagon Office of Special Plans, set up by Doug Feith,
Undersecretary of Defense for Policy, skewed intelligence on
Iraq and may have illegally engaged in intelligence-gathering.
In fact, that investigation was being conducted by the Senate
Intelligence and House Judiciary Committee staffs, not by the
FBI. They are also looking at the possibility that Pentagon
employees pursued unauthorized contacts aimed at preparing the
way for overthrowing the governments of Iran and Syria. This
according to the
Boston Globe:
' Senate Intelligence and House Judiciary Committee staff
members say inquiries into the Near East and South Asia
Affairs division have found preliminary evidence that some
officials gathered questionable information on weapons of mass
destruction from Iraqi exiles such as Ahmed Chalabi without
proper authorization, which helped build President Bush's case
for an invasion last year.
The investigators are also looking into a more serious
concern: whether the office engaged in illegal activity by
holding unauthorized meetings with foreign nationals to
destablize Syria and Iran without the presidential approval
required for covert operations, said one senior congressional
investigator who has longtime experience in intelligence
oversight. '
A pattern of illegal payments for such information is also at
issue. Laura
Rozen says she
has evidence that Pentagon officials paid Manuchehr Ghorbanifar
for documents he provided.
By the way, I personally do not expect any dramatic developments
from all these investigations. AIPAC has powerful protectors on
Capitol Hill, and past charges that it was involved in espionage
for Israel have always been buried. As for the Neocon cult in
the Pentagon, even if they did something illegal, they will not
suffer much because of it. Look at where the Iran-Contra
criminals are, who subverted the US Constitution and stole arms
from the Pentagon to sell illegally to Khomeini. One Iran-Contra
figure, who lied to Congress, now serves in the National
Security Council as the person in charge of the
Israeli-Palestine issue. That is Elliot Abrams, who was pardoned
by Bush the elder and now sets White House policy on among the
more important issues affecting US relations with the Muslim
world. Bush may as well have just appointed Ariel Sharon to
advise him on how to deal with Ariel Sharon (though to be fair,
Sharon is probably more pragmatic than and to the left of
Abrams).
Moreover, if Sharon and AIPAC decide that they need to US
government to take military action against Iran, it is likely
that the US government will do so. They can mobilize the US
evangelicals in favor of this step, putting enormous pressure on
Congress and the executive. Many Iranian expatriates are
extremely wealthy and well connected, and they want such
military action. And, firms like Halliburton, which find work-arounds
allowing them to make money in Iran (and did so when
Dick Cheney was CEO), would love to get rid of the mullas so
they could make the big bucks, and more straightforwardly. So it
isn't that AIPAC can snap its fingers and make something happen
in Washington. But it can put together powerful coalitions and
leverage its influence through policy allies, which does tend to
make things happen.
I don't personally believe that the Iraq war has been good for
Israel in reality, since there is now a great deal of
instability on Israel's front porch, and the Fallujans have
already declared solidarity with Hamas. I don't think US
military action against Iran would be good for anyone, since it
would further destabilize the Persian Gulf (the high oil prices,
by the way, can't be good for the Israeli economy).
But American politics has become so dominated by single-issue
lobbies that they far outweigh the concerns of a mere voter.
Juan Cole is Professor of History at the University of
Michigan. http://www.juancole.com
(In accordance with Title 17
U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to
those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational purposes.
Information Clearing House has no affiliation whatsoever with the
originator of this article nor is Information Clearing House
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.) |