British think tank is pessimistic about Iraq's future
By John Daniszewski
09/02/04 "Los
Angeles Times" -- LONDON — Iraq will be lucky if it manages to avoid a breakup and civil war, and the country can become the spark for a vortex of regional upheaval, a report released Wednesday by Britain's highly regarded Royal Institute of International Affairs concludes.
In a bleak assessment of where Iraq stands nearly 18 months after the launch of the U.S.-led war to depose Saddam Hussein, the institute's Middle East team focused on the internal forces dividing the country and the danger that external pressures could make the tendency even worse.
The report notes that U.N. envoy Lakhdar Brahimi called attention to the possibility of civil war during his visit to Iraq in February. "His warnings should be heeded," it says.
At most, the report suggests, the United States and its allies can hope for a "muddle through" scenario, holding the country together but falling short of their original goal: the creation of a full-fledged democracy friendly to the West. The United States will have to keep all of Iraq's factions "more or less on board" through a combination of clever diplomacy and military restraint, it says, while avoiding any hint of American interference in upcoming elections.
The fragmentation of Iraq is the "default" scenario, the report says, and will would occur if American-led forces pull out of the country too quickly or if the U.S. government imposes its vision on the country too rigidly.
"Under this scenario," the report says, "Kurdish separatism and Shia 'assertiveness work against a smooth transition to elections, while the Sunni Arab minority remains on the offensive and engaged in resistance.
"Antipathy to the U.S. presence grows, not so much in a unified Iraqi nationalist backlash, but rather in a fragmented manner that could presage civil war if the U.S. cuts and runs," it adds. "Even if the U.S. forces try to hold out and prop up the central authority, it may still lose control."
The institute is an independent research body chartered by the queen; its scholars frequently advise the government and the Foreign Office on international issues.
One of the authors of the report — Rosemary Hollis, head of the institute's Middle East program — said Wednesday in an interview that there were two messages to be drawn from the study: that the United States and Britain must be cautious and flexible in their actions in Iraq and accept that the Iraqi central government will be weak and "untidy" for the foreseeable future. Iraq's neighbors — almost none of whom support the U.S. approach there — should be taken into account or they could try to disrupt the transition to the stable government.
"If the place holds together, it will be because all the different players muddle along together, with no one really happy," she said.
There is a convergence of interest among the Kurds, the various Shiite and Sunni factions, and other groups, she said, to keep any one group from gaining dominance.
"For the time being, they will counterbalance each other for fear of anybody else winning," she said.
The report notes that one spark for a fragmentation of Iraq could be a further breakdown in security that causes "previously quiescent members of the population" to lose faith in the transitional process and to "refuse to cooperate and maybe even take up arms."
Once fragmentation begins, it suggests, all Iraqis will be drawn in.
"Such a trend is already apparent in parts of Baghdad, where reports of sectarian violence are ominously commonplace," the report says.
"The lessons of Bosnia indicate that communities that have lived in relative harmony can embrace sectarian divisions overnight," the report says, warning that any division of Iraq would not be neat. "Instead, the fragmentation would be violent and bloody."
The breakdown of Iraq would have dire consequences for the region as well, the report said, giving religious extremists greater freedom and threatening stability in neighboring countries. For instance, militant Sunni Muslims operating from Iraq could undermine the regime in Saudi Arabia. Kurds gaining independence in Iraq could invigorate Kurdish movements in neighboring Syria, Iran and Turkey, and possibly prompt a Turkish military response. If Shiites emerge dominant in Iraq, that could create conditions for an attempt to consolidate the Shiite communities in Lebanon, Iraq, Iran, Bahrain and Saudi Arabia.
Copyright: Los Angeles Times
(In accordance with Title 17
U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to
those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational purposes.
Information Clearing House has no affiliation whatsoever with the
originator of this article nor is Information Clearing House
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.) |
